World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
45
Citations
7559
World Ranking
3912
National Ranking
29

Janet Hoek publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janet Hoek sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 262 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Janet Hoek D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janet Hoek sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Janet Hoek is affiliated with the University of Otago in New Zealand and specializes primarily in the field of Medicine. Their research spans multiple subfields including Physiology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Applied Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and General Health Professions.

Their scholarly output focuses extensively on topics related to Smoking Behavior and Cessation, Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology, Behavioral Health and Interventions, Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet, Media Influence and Health, Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling, as well as Health Disparities and Outcomes.

Janet Hoek has contributed to several recent papers in notable journals. These include:

  • Psychological distress, anxiety, family violence, suicidality, and wellbeing in New Zealand during the COVID-19 lockdown: A cross-sectional study, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • Changes in Tobacco Use During the 2020 COVID-19 Lockdown in New Zealand, 2020, Nicotine & Tobacco Research
  • Closing the gaps in tobacco endgame evidence: a scoping review, 2022, Tobacco Control
  • Plain tobacco packaging: progress, challenges, learning and opportunities, 2022, Tobacco Control
  • Silver linings of the COVID-19 lockdown in New Zealand, 2021, PLoS ONE

Frequent collaborators in their research include Richard Edwards, Mei-Ling Blank, Philip Gendall, Lindsay Robertson, and Andrew Waa. These co-authors have worked collectively on various projects that intersect with Hoek's main research interests.

Significant publication venues for Janet Hoek's work are Tobacco Control, Nicotine & Tobacco Research, PLoS ONE, New Zealand Medical Journal, and BMC Public Health. Tobacco Control stands out as the most frequent venue for their publications, contributing 32 works.

Best Publications

  • Psychological distress, anxiety, family violence, suicidality, and wellbeing in New Zealand during the COVID-19 lockdown: A cross-sectional study.

    Susanna Every-Palmer;Matthew Jenkins;Philip Gendall;Janet Hoek

  • An Investigation of Factors Associated With Student Participation in Study Abroad

    Stephanie Doyle;Philip Gendall;Luanna H. Meyer;Janet Hoek

  • Regulation, public health and social marketing: a behaviour change trinity

    Janet Hoek;Sandra C. Jones

  • A Systematic Review on the Impact of Point-of-Sale Tobacco Promotion on Smoking

    Lindsay Robertson;Rob McGee;Louise Marsh;Janet Hoek

  • Market segmentation: A search for the Holy Grail?

    Janet Hoek;Philip Gendall;Don Esslemont

  • Point-of-sale tobacco promotion and youth smoking: a meta-analysis

    Lindsay Robertson;Claire Cameron;Rob McGee;Louise Marsh

  • Children’s everyday exposure to food marketing: an objective analysis using wearable cameras

    L. N. Signal;J. Stanley;M. Smith;M. B. Barr

  • Sponsorship and advertising: a comparison of their effects

    Janet Hoek;Philip Gendall;Michelle Jeffcoat;David Orsman

  • Interpretive front-of-pack nutrition labels. Comparing competing recommendations.

    Ninya Maubach;Janet Hoek;Damien Mather

  • Effects of dissuasive packaging on young adult smokers

    Janet Hoek;Christiane Wong;Philip Gendall;Jordan Louviere

  • Advertising and obesity: a behavioral perspective.

    Janet Hoek;Philip Gendall

  • An exploration of parents' food purchasing behaviours.

    Ninya Maubach;Janet Hoek;Tim McCreanor

  • Ambush Marketing: A Critical Review and Some Practical Advice

    Dean Crow;Janet Hoek

  • THE BEHAVIOR OF RESPONDENTS, NONRESPONDENTS, AND REFUSERS ACROSS MAIL SURVEYS

    Mike Brennan;Janet Hoek

  • How do tobacco retail displays affect cessation attempts? Findings from a qualitative study

    J Hoek;H Gifford;G Pirikahu;G Thomson

  • Message framing effects on price discounting

    Philip Gendall;Janet Hoek;Tracy Pope;Karen Young

  • Tobacco Branding, Plain Packaging, Pictorial Warnings, and Symbolic Consumption

    Janet Hoek;Philip Gendall;Heather Gifford;Gill Pirikahu

  • Social smokers' management of conflicted identities

    Janet Hoek;Ninya Maubach;Rachel Stevenson;Philip Gendall

  • Dual use of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) and smoked tobacco: a qualitative analysis.

    Lindsay Robertson;Janet Hoek;Mei Ling Blank;Rosalina Richards

  • Descriptive and evaluative attributes: what relevance to marketers?

    Janet Hoek;Jason Dunnett;Malcolm Wright;Philip Gendall

  • Changes in Tobacco Use During the 2020 COVID-19 Lockdown in New Zealand.

    Philip Gendall;Janet Hoek;James Stanley;Mathew Jenkins

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard Edwards
Richard Edwards University of Otago
Nick Wilson
Nick Wilson University of Otago
Jordan J. Louviere
Jordan J. Louviere University of South Australia
Rob McGee
Rob McGee University of Otago
Tony Blakely
Tony Blakely University of Melbourne
Jim Mann
Jim Mann University of Otago
Pamela M. Ling
Pamela M. Ling University of California, San Francisco
Sandra C. Jones
Sandra C. Jones Australian Catholic University
James F. Thrasher
James F. Thrasher University of South Carolina
Crawford Moodie
Crawford Moodie University of Stirling

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online education has made it easier than ever for students to pursue careers rooted in social sciences and humanities. Whether you’re interested in working with individuals, families, or communities, flexible learning options are now widely available.

Many students start with psychology. Earning a psychology online degree provides a broad foundation, opening doors to careers in mental health, human resources, research, and more.

For those who wish to make a direct impact in counseling, consider best online cacrep counseling programs. CACREP-accredited degrees are essential for licensure in many states and offer rigorous, well-respected training.

Specializing in family dynamics is also popular. Accredited marriage and family therapy online programs accredited prepare students for rewarding work supporting couples and families through life’s challenges.

Finally, those seeking a broad impactful role in community support can explore online master's in social work options. These programs are designed to create skilled social workers ready to serve in diverse settings.

Best Scientists Citing Janet Hoek

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles