World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 68 866 754 163 146 274 14465

Jamie Pearce publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jamie Pearce between 2000 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jamie Pearce published across 22 years, from 2000 to 2021, averaging 11.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 28 publications in 2018. 34 of the 261 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 28. Peak 28 publications in 2018. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 16 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 21 publications 2015: 18 publications 2016: 25 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 28 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 19 publications 2021: 15 publications
2000 2021

261 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jamie Pearce: publications per year, 2000 to 2021
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 0
2002 0
2003 3
2004 0
2005 6
2006 11
2007 12
2008 16
2009 14
2010 13
2011 12
2012 8
2013 9
2014 21
2015 18
2016 25
2017 15
2018 28
2019 15
2020 19
2021 15
Total 261
Download as CSV

Jamie Pearce publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jamie Pearce sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 274–283 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 274 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138 274
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Jamie Pearce D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jamie Pearce sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 68 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49 68
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Statistics
  • Public health
  • Social science

His primary areas of investigation include Environmental health, Socioeconomic status, Inequality, Public health and Socioeconomics. His research integrates issues of Enterprise GIS, GIS and public health and Risk assessment in his study of Environmental health. His study in Socioeconomic status is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Biostatistics, Risk of mortality and Environmental protection.

He combines subjects such as Economic growth, Multilevel model, Social environment and Demographic economics with his study of Inequality. His Public health research integrates issues from Demography, Logistic regression, Odds and Quartile. His studies in Socioeconomics integrate themes in fields like Health equity, Disadvantaged, Ethnic group and Census.

His most cited work include:

  • A review of intraurban variations in particulate air pollution: Implications for epidemiological research (277 citations)
  • Role of physical activity in the relationship between urban green space and health (251 citations)
  • Neighborhood deprivation and access to fast-food retailing: a national study. (232 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His main research concerns Environmental health, Demography, Inequality, Socioeconomic status and Public health. The study incorporates disciplines such as Cross-sectional study and Tobacco control in addition to Environmental health. His Demography research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Logistic regression, Gerontology, Mental health, Ethnic group and Confounding.

His Mental health research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Disadvantaged and Life course approach. His Inequality research incorporates elements of Economic growth, Development economics and Demographic economics. His Socioeconomic status study frequently draws parallels with other fields, such as Socioeconomics.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Environmental health (28.92%)
  • Demography (19.68%)
  • Inequality (18.47%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2018-2021)?

  • Mental health (10.84%)
  • Socioeconomic status (18.07%)
  • Environmental health (28.92%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Jamie Pearce spends much of his time researching Mental health, Socioeconomic status, Environmental health, Longitudinal study and Demography. His research integrates issues of Development economics, Cohort study and Depression in his study of Mental health. Jamie Pearce undertakes multidisciplinary investigations into Socioeconomic status and Legislation in his work.

His Environmental health research includes elements of Focus group, Life course approach and Public health. His study in Economic growth extends to Public health with its themes. His Demography study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Disadvantaged, Environmental exposure and Activities of daily living.

Between 2018 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Spatial Lifecourse Epidemiology Reporting Standards (ISLE-ReSt) statement. (26 citations)
  • Scaling up: The politics of health and place. (26 citations)
  • Changing labour market conditions during the ‘great recession’ and mental health in Scotland 2007–2011: an example using the Scottish Longitudinal Study and data for local areas in Scotland (10 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Statistics
  • China
  • Public health

His primary areas of study are Socioeconomic status, Environmental health, Demography, Population health and Social determinants of health. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Young population, Agricultural economics and Tobacco use. In his works, Jamie Pearce performs multidisciplinary study on Environmental health and China.

The various areas that Jamie Pearce examines in his Demography study include Tobacco control, Disadvantaged, Individual mobility and Environmental exposure. His study looks at the relationship between Population health and fields such as Life course approach, as well as how they intersect with chemical problems. His Social determinants of health research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Longitudinal study and Demographic economics.

Best Publications

  • Role of physical activity in the relationship between urban green space and health

    E.A. Richardson;J. Pearce;R. Mitchell;S. Kingham

  • A review of intraurban variations in particulate air pollution: Implications for epidemiological research

    J. Gaines Wilson;Simon Kingham;Jamie Pearce;Andrew P. Sturman

  • Neighborhood Environments and Socioeconomic Inequalities in Mental Well-Being

    Richard J. Mitchell;Elizabeth A. Richardson;Niamh K. Shortt;Jamie R. Pearce

  • Neighborhood deprivation and access to fast-food retailing: a national study.

    Jamie Pearce;Tony Blakely;Karen Witten;Phil Bartie

  • Neighbourhoods and health: a GIS approach to measuring community resource accessibility

    Jamie Pearce;Karen Witten;Phil Bartie

  • The International Encyclopedia of Human Geography

    Jamie Pearce

  • Using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to assess the role of the built environment in influencing obesity: a glossary

    Lukar E Thornton;Jamie R Pearce;Anne M Kavanagh

  • Are socially disadvantaged neighbourhoods deprived of health-related community resources?

    Jamie Pearce;Karen Witten;Rosemary Hiscock;Tony Blakely

  • The association between green space and cause-specific mortality in urban New Zealand: an ecological analysis of green space utility

    Elizabeth Richardson;Jamie Pearce;Richard Mitchell;Peter Day

  • Neighbourhood access to open spaces and the physical activity of residents: a national study.

    Karen Witten;Rosemary Hiscock;Jamie Pearce;Tony Blakely

  • Environmental justice and health: the implications of the socio-spatial distribution of multiple environmental deprivation for health inequalities in the United Kingdom

    Jamie R Pearce;Elizabeth A Richardson;Richard J Mitchell;Niamh K Shortt

  • The contextual effects of neighbourhood access to supermarkets and convenience stores on individual fruit and vegetable consumption

    J Pearce;Rosemary Hiscock;T Blakely;K Witten

  • The relationship between wealth and loneliness among older people across Europe: Is social participation protective?

    Claire L. Niedzwiedz;Elizabeth A. Richardson;Helena Tunstall;Niamh K. Shortt

  • Moralising geographies: stigma, smoking islands and responsible subjects

    Lee Thompson;Jamie Pearce;J Ross Barnett

  • Obesity-promoting food environments and the spatial clustering of food outlets around schools.

    Peter L. Day;Jamie Pearce

  • Neighborhood Built Environment and Transport and Leisure Physical Activity: Findings Using Objective Exposure and Outcome Measures in New Zealand

    Karen Witten;Tony Blakely;Nasser Bagheri;Hannah Badland

  • A national study of neighbourhood access to gambling opportunities and individual gambling behaviour

    J Pearce;K Mason;Rosemary Hiscock;P Day

  • Is Neighborhood Access to Health Care Provision Associated with Individual-Level Utilization and Satisfaction?

    Rosemary Hiscock;Jamie Pearce;Tony Blakely;Karen Witten

  • Increasing geographical inequalities in health in New Zealand, 1980–2001

    Jamie Pearce;Danny Dorling

  • Scaling up: The politics of health and place.

    Clare Bambra;Katherine E Smith;Jamie Pearce

  • A national study of the association between neighbourhood access to fast food outlets and the diet and weight of local residents

    Jamie Pearce;Rosemary Hiscock;Tony Blakely;Karen Witten

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard Mitchell
Richard Mitchell University of Glasgow
Graham Moon
Graham Moon University of Southampton
Karen Witten
Karen Witten Massey University
Simon Kingham
Simon Kingham University of Canterbury
Sarah Curtis
Sarah Curtis Durham University
Amanda Amos
Amanda Amos University of Edinburgh
Martine Stead
Martine Stead University of Stirling
Anne Marie MacKintosh
Anne Marie MacKintosh University of Stirling
Tony Blakely
Tony Blakely University of Melbourne
Clare Bambra
Clare Bambra Newcastle University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities opens the door to diverse online degrees and evolving career paths. Many prospective students look for flexible, quality programs that match their aspirations in psychology, education, marriage and family therapy, and more.

For those interested in clinical psychology, accredited psyd programs are essential for meeting licensure requirements and gaining advanced counseling skills. Similarly, those pursuing a career in therapy may consider online masters mft programs, which offer flexible pathways toward becoming a licensed marriage and family therapist.

Budget-conscious students can explore affordable online psychology masters programs, making advanced education more accessible without compromising on quality. For those seeking leadership roles in education, fastest edd program online options enable working professionals to upskill efficiently and advance their academic or administrative careers.

Whether your goal is counseling, research, or educational leadership, these online pathways provide flexible and cost-effective routes to making a meaningful impact in society.

Best Scientists Citing Jamie Pearce

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles