World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
73
Citations
18235
World Ranking
2211
National Ranking
223

Matthew J. Brookes publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew J. Brookes sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 170 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Matthew J. Brookes D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew J. Brookes sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Matthew J. Brookes is affiliated with the University of Nottingham in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Neuroscience, Physics and Astronomy, and Medicine, with substantial contributions to subfields such as Cognitive Neuroscience, Atomic and Molecular Physics and Optics, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, and Neurology.

The main topics covered in their work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research, Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications, EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces, Neural Dynamics and Brain Function, Magnetic and Transport Properties of Perovskites and Related Materials, and Epilepsy Research and Treatment.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Matthew J. Brookes are:

  • Niall Holmes
  • Ryan M. Hill
  • Elena Boto
  • Richard Bowtell
  • Vishal Shah

Their research has been published extensively in venues such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • NeuroImage
  • Imaging Neuroscience
  • Scientific Reports
  • NeuroImage Clinical

Recent papers by Matthew J. Brookes include:

  • "Magnetoencephalography with optically pumped magnetometers (OPM-MEG): the next generation of functional neuroimaging" (2022, Trends in Neurosciences)
  • "Theoretical advantages of a triaxial optically pumped magnetometer magnetoencephalography system" (2021, NeuroImage)

Other notable papers from their broader research networks include:

  • "Multi-channel whole-head OPM-MEG: Helmet design and a comparison with a conventional system" (2020, NeuroImage)
  • "Triaxial detection of the neuromagnetic field using optically-pumped magnetometry: feasibility and application in children" (2022, NeuroImage)
  • "On-Scalp Optically Pumped Magnetometers versus Cryogenic Magnetoencephalography for Diagnostic Evaluation of Epilepsy in School-aged Children" (2022, Radiology)

Best Publications

  • Moving magnetoencephalography towards real-world applications with a wearable system.

    Elena Boto;Niall Holmes;James Leggett;Gillian Roberts

  • Investigating the electrophysiological basis of resting state networks using magnetoencephalography

    Matthew J. Brookes;Mark Woolrich;Henry Luckhoo;Darren Price

  • Fast transient networks in spontaneous human brain activity

    Adam P. Baker;Matthew J. Brookes;Iead A. Rezek;Stephen M. Smith

  • Measuring functional connectivity using MEG: methodology and comparison with fcMRI.

    Matthew J. Brookes;Joanne R. Hale;Johanna M. Zumer;Claire M. Stevenson

  • Broadband Cortical Desynchronization Underlies the Human Psychedelic State

    Suresh D Muthukumaraswamy;Robin L Carhart-Harris;Rosalyn J Moran;Matthew J Brookes

  • A new generation of magnetoencephalography: Room temperature measurements using optically-pumped magnetometers

    Elena Boto;Sofie S. Meyer;Vishal Shah;Orang Alem

  • A symmetric multivariate leakage correction for MEG connectomes.

    Giles L. Colclough;Matthew J. Brookes;Stephen M. Smith;Mark W. Woolrich

  • How reliable are MEG resting-state connectivity metrics?

    Giles L. Colclough;Mark W. Woolrich;Prejaas Tewarie;Matthew J. Brookes

  • Magnetoencephalography with optically pumped magnetometers (OPM-MEG): the next generation of functional neuroimaging

    Unknown

  • Spontaneous cortical activity transiently organises into frequency specific phase-coupling networks.

    D Vidaurre;L T Hunt;A J Quinn;Hunt Bae.

  • Measuring functional connectivity in MEG: A multivariate approach insensitive to linear source leakage

    Matthew J. Brookes;Mark William Woolrich;Gareth R. Barnes

  • Optically pumped magnetometers: From quantum origins to multi-channel magnetoencephalography.

    Tim M. Tierney;Niall Holmes;Stephanie Mellor;José David López

  • Water proton T1 measurements in brain tissue at 7, 3, and 1.5 T using IR-EPI, IR-TSE, and MPRAGE: results and optimization.

    P. J. Wright;O. E. Mougin;J. J. Totman;A. M. Peters

  • T2* measurements in human brain at 1.5, 3 and 7 T.

    Andrew M. Peters;Matthew J. Brookes;Frank G. Hoogenraad;Penny A. Gowland

  • Multi-channel whole-head OPM-MEG: Helmet design and a comparison with a conventional system.

    Ryan M. Hill;Elena Boto;Molly Rea;Niall Holmes

  • Ghost interactions in MEG/EEG source space: A note of caution on inter-areal coupling measures.

    J. Matias Palva;Sheng H. Wang;Satu Palva;Alexander Y. Zhigalov

  • Optimising experimental design for MEG beamformer imaging.

    Matthew J. Brookes;Jiri Vrba;Stephen E. Robinson;Claire M. Stevenson

  • A bi-planar coil system for nulling background magnetic fields in scalp mounted magnetoencephalography.

    Niall Holmes;James Leggett;Elena Boto;Gillian Roberts

  • Triaxial detection of the neuromagnetic field using optically-pumped magnetometry: feasibility and application in children

    Unknown

  • Dynamics of large-scale electrophysiological networks: a technical review

    George C. O'Neill;Prejaas K. Tewarie;Diego Vidaurre;Lucrezia Liuzzi

  • A multi-layer network approach to MEG connectivity analysis.

    Matthew J. Brookes;Prejaas K. Tewarie;Benjamin A.E. Hunt;Sian E. Robson

  • GLM-beamformer method demonstrates stationary field, alpha ERD and gamma ERS co-localisation with fMRI BOLD response in visual cortex

    Matthew J Brookes;Andrew M Gibson;Stephen D Hall;Paul Lawrence Furlong

  • The relationship between MEG and fMRI

    Emma L. Hall;Siân E. Robson;Peter G. Morris;Matthew J. Brookes

Frequent Co-Authors

Gareth R. Barnes
Gareth R. Barnes University College London
Richard Bowtell
Richard Bowtell University of Nottingham
Mark W. Woolrich
Mark W. Woolrich University of Oxford
Prejaas Tewarie
Prejaas Tewarie University of Twente
Karen J. Mullinger
Karen J. Mullinger University of Nottingham
Peter F. Liddle
Peter F. Liddle University of Nottingham
Arjan Hillebrand
Arjan Hillebrand Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Penny A. Gowland
Penny A. Gowland University of Nottingham
Sven Bestmann
Sven Bestmann University College London
Krish D. Singh
Krish D. Singh Cardiff University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Matthew J. Brookes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles