World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Stephen G. Ellis

Stephen G. Ellis

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
156
Citations
94223
World Ranking
917
National Ranking
520

Stephen G. Ellis publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen G. Ellis sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 850 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Stephen G. Ellis D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen G. Ellis sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 156 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stephen G. Ellis is affiliated with the Cleveland Clinic in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with a specific emphasis on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, surgery, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, and biomedical engineering.

The scientist's main fields of study include:

  • Medicine

Subfields extensively covered in their work are:

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Surgery
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Biomedical Engineering

The topics addressed in their publications span multiple aspects of cardiovascular science and intervention, including:

  • Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Vascular Procedures and Complications
  • Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair

Stephen G. Ellis has contributed to a variety of papers, some of which are:

  • Excimer Laser Atherectomy in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Contemporary Review (2020), Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
  • 5-Year Outcomes After Bioresorbable Coronary Scaffolds Implanted With Improved Technique (2023), Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Takotsubo Syndrome: Incremental Prognostic Value of Baseline Left Ventricular Systolic Function (2020), Journal of the American Heart Association
  • Coronary artery aneurysms: outcomes following medical, percutaneous interventional and surgical management (2021), Open Heart
  • Interaction Between Race and Income on Cardiac Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (2022), Journal of the American Heart Association

The frequent co-authors collaborating with this scientist include:

  • Samir Kapadia
  • Khaled M. Ziada
  • Amar Krishnaswamy
  • Grant W. Reed
  • Jaikirshan Khatri

Publications by Stephen G. Ellis are often found in prominent journals in the cardiovascular field. The most frequent publication venues are:

  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
  • JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
  • Circulation
  • The American Journal of Cardiology

Best Publications

  • 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions

    Glenn N. Levine;Eric R. Bates;James C. Blankenship;Steven R. Bailey

  • A polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease

    Gregg W. Stone;Stephen G. Ellis;David A. Cox;James Hermiller

  • 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

    Glenn N. Levine;Eric R. Bates;James C. Blankenship;Steven R. Bailey

  • Safety and efficacy of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting coronary stents

    Gregg W. Stone;Jeffrey W. Moses;Stephen G. Ellis;Joachim Schofer

  • Large-scale association analysis identifies 13 new susceptibility loci for coronary artery disease

    Heribert Schunkert;Inke R. König;Sekar Kathiresan;Muredach P. Reilly

  • Prevalence of Conventional Risk Factors in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease

    Umesh N. Khot;Monica B. Khot;Christopher T. Bajzer;Shelly K. Sapp

  • Effect of stromal-cell-derived factor 1 on stem-cell homing and tissue regeneration in ischaemic cardiomyopathy.

    Arman T Askari;Samuel Unzek;Zoran B Popovic;Corey K Goldman

  • Coronary morphologic and clinical determinants of procedural outcome with angioplasty for multivessel coronary disease. Implications for patient selection. Multivessel Angioplasty Prognosis Study Group.

    Stephen G. Ellis;Michel G. Vandormael;Michael J. Cowley;Germano DiSciascio

  • A clinical trial comparing primary coronary angioplasty with tissue plasminogen activator for acute myocardial infarction

    Maarten Simoons;Stephen Ellis

  • Marked Inflammatory Sequelae to Implantation of Biodegradable and Nonbiodegradable Polymers in Porcine Coronary Arteries

    Willem J. van der Giessen;A. Michael Lincoff;Robert S. Schwartz;Heleen M.M. van Beusekom

  • Dual Antithrombotic Therapy with Dabigatran after PCI in Atrial Fibrillation.

    Christopher P. Cannon;Deepak L. Bhatt;Jonas Oldgren;Gregory Y.H. Lip

  • One-Year Clinical Results With the Slow-Release, Polymer-Based, Paclitaxel-Eluting TAXUS Stent The TAXUS-IV Trial

    Gregg W. Stone;Stephen G. Ellis;David A. Cox;James Hermiller

  • Comparison of a polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stent with a bare metal stent in patients with complex coronary artery disease: a randomized controlled trial.

    Gregg W. Stone;Stephen G. Ellis;Louis Cannon;J. Tift Mann

  • American College of Cardiology key data elements and definitions for measuring the clinical management and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes. A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Data Standards (Acute Coronary Syndromes Writing Committee).

    Christopher P Cannon;Alexander Battler;Ralph G Brindis;Jafna L Cox

  • Localized intracoronary gamma-radiation therapy to inhibit the recurrence of restenosis after stenting

    Martin B. Leon;Paul S. Teirstein;Jeffrey W. Moses;Prabhakar Tripuraneni

  • Angiographic and clinical predictors of acute closure after native vessel coronary angioplasty

    Stephen Ellis;G. S. Roubin;S. B. King;J. S. Douglas

  • Increased coronary perforation in the new device era. Incidence, classification, management, and outcome.

    Stephen G. Ellis;Steven Ajluni;Anita Z. Arnold;Jeffrey J. Popma

  • Facilitated PCI in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

    Stephen G. Ellis;Michal Tendera;Mark A. de Belder;Ad J. van Boven

  • Clinical experience with the Palmaz-Schatz coronary stent. Initial results of a multicenter study.

    R A Schatz;D S Baim;M Leon;S G Ellis

  • A polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease☆

    G.W Stone;S.G Ellis;D.A Cox

Frequent Co-Authors

Eric J. Topol
Eric J. Topol Scripps Research Institute
Samir R. Kapadia
Samir R. Kapadia Cleveland Clinic
Gregg W. Stone
Gregg W. Stone Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Deepak L. Bhatt
Deepak L. Bhatt Mount Sinai Hospital
Jeffrey J. Popma
Jeffrey J. Popma Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Dean J. Kereiakes
Dean J. Kereiakes The Christ Hospital Health Network
E. Murat Tuzcu
E. Murat Tuzcu Cleveland Clinic
Robert M. Califf
Robert M. Califf Duke University
A. Michael Lincoff
A. Michael Lincoff Cleveland Clinic
David R. Holmes
David R. Holmes Mayo Clinic

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in medicine but want alternative or supplemental options to the traditional MD path? There are several online degrees and career pathways in healthcare that offer flexibility and affordability for students from diverse backgrounds.

For registered nurses aiming to advance their qualifications, enrolling in one of the cheapest rn to bsn online programs can be a practical choice. These programs let RNs earn a bachelor’s degree with lower tuition costs and a flexible study schedule.

If you have a non-nursing bachelor’s degree and want to transition into nursing, consider direct entry online msn programs. These accelerated pathways can fast-track your journey to an advanced nursing role, even if you’re not yet a licensed RN.

Those concerned about admissions competitiveness might explore the easiest nursing schools to get into. This option may open doors for students striving to enter the healthcare workforce without high barriers.

Lastly, if you’re seeking a non-clinical role, medical billing and coding schools online with financial aid can lead to vital administrative careers in healthcare. These programs often allow students to study at their own pace while receiving essential financial support.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen G. Ellis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles