World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
112
Citations
57286
World Ranking
5077
National Ranking
2748

Lowell F. Satler publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lowell F. Satler sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,427 publications — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Lowell F. Satler D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lowell F. Satler sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 112 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lowell F. Satler is affiliated with MedStar Washington Hospital Center in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a particular focus on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine. The main areas of their research encompass cardiac valve diseases and treatments, infective endocarditis diagnosis and management, and cardiac imaging and diagnostics.

Their work spans several subfields within medicine, including cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, surgery, epidemiology, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, and radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging.

Lowell F. Satler has authored numerous publications, with research regularly appearing in notable journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
  • JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • The American Journal of Cardiology
  • Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

Prominent recent papers by Lowell F. Satler include:

  • Five-Year Outcomes of Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement, 2020, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Cerebral Embolic Protection during Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement, 2022, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Surgical Explantation After TAVR Failure, 2021, JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
  • Self-expanding intra-annular versus commercially available transcatheter heart valves in high and extreme risk patients with severe aortic stenosis (PORTICO IDE): a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial, 2020, The Lancet
  • Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients With Symptomatic Severe Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis, 2020, JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions

Coauthors frequently collaborating with Lowell F. Satler include:

  • Ron Waksman
  • Toby Rogers
  • Itsik Ben-Dor
  • Brian C. Case
  • Cheng Zhang

The main topics of Lowell F. Satler's research focus on:

  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
  • Acute Myocardial Infarction Research

Best Publications

  • Late thrombosis in drug-eluting coronary stents after discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy.

    Eugène P McFadden;Eugenio Stabile;Evelyn Regar;Edouard Cheneau

  • Patterns and Mechanisms of In-Stent Restenosis A Serial Intravascular Ultrasound Study

    Rainer Hoffmann;Gary S. Mintz;Gaston R. Dussaillant;Jeffrey J. Popma

  • Angiographic Patterns of In-Stent Restenosis Classification and Implications for Long-Term Outcome

    Roxana Mehran;George Dangas;Andrea S. Abizaid;Gary S. Mintz

  • Arterial Remodeling After Coronary Angioplasty A Serial Intravascular Ultrasound Study

    Gary S. Mintz;Jeffrey J. Popma;Augusto D. Pichard;Kenneth M. Kent

  • Genome-wide association of early-onset myocardial infarction with single nucleotide polymorphisms and copy number variants.

    Sekar Kathiresan;Benjamin F Voight;Shaun Purcell;Kiran Musunuru

  • The prognostic implications of further renal function deterioration within 48 h of interventional coronary procedures in patients with pre-existent chronic renal insufficiency.

    Luis Gruberg;Gary S Mintz;Roxana Mehran;George Dangas

  • Correlates and Long-Term Outcomes of Angiographically Proven Stent Thrombosis With Sirolimus- and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents

    Pramod K. Kuchulakanti;William W. Chu;Rebecca Torguson;Patrick Ohlmann

  • Atherosclerosis in angiographically “normal” coronary artery reference segments: An intravascular ultrasound study with clinical correlations

    Gary S. Mintz;Jack A. Painter;Augusto D. Pichard;Kenneth M. Kent

  • The impact of obesity on the short-term andlong-term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention: the obesity paradox?

    Luis Gruberg;Neil J Weissman;Ron Waksman;Shmuel Fuchs

  • Patterns of Calcification in Coronary Artery Disease A Statistical Analysis of Intravascular Ultrasound and Coronary Angiography in 1155 Lesions

    Gary S. Mintz;Jeffrey J. Popma;Augusto D. Pichard;Kenneth M. Kent

  • Intracoronary gamma-radiation therapy after angioplasty inhibits recurrence in patients with in-stent restenosis

    Ron Waksman;R. Larry White;Rosanna C. Chan;Bill G. Bass

  • Meta-analysis and imputation refines the association of 15q25 with smoking quantity

    Jason Z. Liu;Federica Tozzi;Dawn M. Waterworth;Sreekumar G. Pillai

  • Incidence, predictors, and prognostic implications of bleeding and blood transfusion following percutaneous coronary interventions

    Timothy D Kinnaird;Eugenio Stabile;Gary S Mintz;Cheol Whan Lee

  • Increased restenosis in diabetes mellitus after coronary interventions is due to exaggerated intimal hyperplasia. A serial intravascular ultrasound study.

    Ran Kornowski;Gary S. Mintz;Kenneth M. Kent;Augusto D. Pichard

  • The influence of diabetes mellitus on acute and late clinical outcomes following coronary stent implantation

    Alexandre Abizaid;Ran Kornowski;Gary S Mintz;Mun K Hong

  • Predictors of Subacute Stent Thrombosis Results of a Systematic Intravascular Ultrasound Study

    Edouard Cheneau;Laurent Leborgne;Gary S. Mintz;Jun-ichi Kotani

  • Catheter-based autologous bone marrow myocardial injection in no-option patients with advanced coronary artery disease: A feasibility study

    Shmuel Fuchs;Lowell F Satler;Ran Kornowski;Petros Okubagzi

  • Vascular Complications After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Insights From the PARTNER (Placement of AoRTic TraNscathetER Valve) Trial

    Philippe Généreux;John G. Webb;Lars G. Svensson;Susheel K. Kodali

  • Genetic associations at 53 loci highlight cell types and biological pathways relevant for kidney function

    Cristian Pattaro;Alexander Teumer;Mathias Gorski;Audrey Y. Chu

  • Response to Letter Regarding Article, “Correlates and Long-Term Outcomes of Angiographically Proven Stent Thrombosis with Sirolimus- and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents”

    Pramod K. Kuchulakanti;William W. Chu;Rebecca Torguson;Patrick Ohlmann

Frequent Co-Authors

Augusto D. Pichard
Augusto D. Pichard Georgetown University
Ron Waksman
Ron Waksman MedStar Washington Hospital Center
Kenneth M. Kent
Kenneth M. Kent MedStar Washington Hospital Center
Martin B. Leon
Martin B. Leon Columbia University Medical Center
Gary S. Mintz
Gary S. Mintz Columbia University Medical Center
Neil J. Weissman
Neil J. Weissman MedStar Health
Jeffrey J. Popma
Jeffrey J. Popma Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Roxana Mehran
Roxana Mehran Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Alexandra J. Lansky
Alexandra J. Lansky Yale University
George Dangas
George Dangas Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative paths related to Medicine in the USA? Many students are interested in flexible and affordable online education options that can lead to rewarding healthcare careers. Entry-level fields like medical billing and coding are a popular choice. If you’re wondering about how much is medical billing and coding school, you'll find that accredited online programs can prepare you for certification at a fraction of traditional tuition costs.

For those looking to work directly with patients, there are several cheap online nursing programs available, offering flexible schedules for aspiring RNs and LPNs. Advancement opportunities are plentiful: registered nurses can enroll in the cheapest online fnp programs to become Family Nurse Practitioners. For those pursuing leadership or advanced clinical roles, the cheapest dnp online program can be a cost-effective way to earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice.

These online options offer greater accessibility and affordability, making it easier to join the healthcare workforce or advance your qualifications while balancing work and life commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Lowell F. Satler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles