World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Neil J. Weissman

Neil J. Weissman

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
102
Citations
69787
World Ranking
7483
National Ranking
3912

Neil J. Weissman publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neil J. Weissman sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 523 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Neil J. Weissman D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neil J. Weissman sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 102 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Neil J. Weissman is affiliated with MedStar Health in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with a strong emphasis on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine. Throughout their career, they have contributed extensively to the study of cardiac valve diseases and treatments, cardiovascular function and risk factors, cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies, cardiac imaging and diagnostics, infective endocarditis diagnosis and management, cardiac structural anomalies and repair, and atrial fibrillation management and outcomes.

The scientist has published numerous papers in prominent journals, contributing significantly to the academic corpus in cardiovascular medicine. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
  • Circulation
  • European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
  • JAMA Cardiology

Some of their recent papers include:

  • Utility of a Deep-Learning Algorithm to Guide Novices to Acquire Echocardiograms for Limited Diagnostic Use, 2021, JAMA Cardiology
  • Optical coherence tomography in coronary atherosclerosis assessment and intervention, 2022, Nature Reviews Cardiology
  • Structural Deterioration of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Bioprostheses in the PARTNER-2 Trial, 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • 3-Year Outcomes of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair in Patients With Heart Failure, 2021, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Relationship Between Residual Mitral Regurgitation and Clinical and Quality-of-Life Outcomes After Transcatheter and Medical Treatments in Heart Failure, 2021, Circulation

Weissman collaborates frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Federico M. Asch
  • Michael J. Mack
  • Gregg W. Stone
  • William T. Abraham
  • JoAnn Lindenfeld

The scientist's work spans multiple subfields within medicine, with significant contributions to epidemiology, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, surgery, and pulmonary and respiratory medicine.

Best Publications

  • Standardized Myocardial Segmentation and Nomenclature for Tomographic Imaging of the Heart A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association

    Manuel D. Cerqueira;Neil J. Weissman;Vasken Dilsizian;Alice K. Jacobs

  • Recommendations for evaluation of the severity of native valvular regurgitation with two-dimensional and doppler echocardiography

    William A Zoghbi;Maurice Enriquez-Sarano;Elyse Foster;Paul A Grayburn

  • Recommendations for Noninvasive Evaluation of Native Valvular Regurgitation: A Report from the American Society of Echocardiography Developed in Collaboration with the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

    William A. Zoghbi;David Adams;Robert O. Bonow;Maurice Enriquez-Sarano

  • Subclinical thyroid disease: scientific review and guidelines for diagnosis and management.

    Martin I. Surks;Eduardo Ortiz;Gilbert H. Daniels;Clark T. Sawin

  • Transcatheter Mitral-Valve Repair in Patients with Heart Failure.

    Gregg W. Stone;JoAnn Lindenfeld;William T. Abraham;Saibal Kar

  • Consensus standards for acquisition, measurement, and reporting of intravascular optical coherence tomography studies: a report from the International Working Group for Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography Standardization and Validation.

    Guillermo J. Tearney;Evelyn Regar;Takashi Akasaka;Tom Adriaenssens

  • Late thrombosis in drug-eluting coronary stents after discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy.

    Eugène P McFadden;Eugenio Stabile;Evelyn Regar;Edouard Cheneau

  • Recommendations for Evaluation of Prosthetic Valves With Echocardiography and Doppler Ultrasound. A Report From the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Task Force on Prosthetic Valves, Developed in Conjunction With the American College of Cardiology Cardiovascular Imaging Committee, Cardiac Imaging Committee of the American Heart Association

    William A. Zoghbi;John B. Chambers;Jean G. Dumesnil;Elyse Foster

  • American Society of Echocardiography Recommendations for Use of Echocardiography in Clinical Trials A Report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and The Task Force on Echocardiography in Clinical Trials

    John S. Gottdiener;James Bednarz;Richard Devereux;Julius Gardin

  • Transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgical valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients: a propensity score analysis

    Vinod H. Thourani;Susheel Kodali;Raj R. Makkar;Howard C. Herrmann

  • Temporary scaffolding of coronary arteries with bioabsorbable magnesium stents: a prospective, non-randomised multicentre trial

    Raimund Erbel;Carlo Di Mario;Jozef Bartunek;Johann Bonnier

  • Multicenter, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Lorcaserin for Weight Management

    Steven R. Smith;Neil J. Weissman;Christen M. Anderson;Matilde Sanchez

  • Possible Subclinical Leaflet Thrombosis in Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves

    Raj R Makkar;Gregory Fontana;Lars Søndergaard

  • ACCF/ASE/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCM/SCCT/SCMR 2011 Appropriate Use Criteria for Echocardiography

    Pamela S. Douglas;Mario J. Garcia;David E. Haines;Wyman W. Lai

  • Extended-Release Niacin or Ezetimibe and Carotid Intima–Media Thickness

    Allen J. Taylor;Todd C. Villines;Eric J. Stanek;Patrick J. Devine

  • The impact of obesity on the short-term andlong-term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention: the obesity paradox?

    Luis Gruberg;Neil J Weissman;Ron Waksman;Shmuel Fuchs

  • A One-Year Randomized Trial of Lorcaserin for Weight Loss in Obese and Overweight Adults: The BLOSSOM Trial

    Meredith C. Fidler;Matilde Sanchez;Brian Raether;Neil J. Weissman

  • Transendocardial delivery of autologous bone marrow enhances collateral perfusion and regional function in pigs with chronic experimental myocardial ischemia.

    Shmuel Fuchs;Richard Baffour;Yi Fu Zhou;Matie Shou

  • Incidence, predictors, and prognostic implications of bleeding and blood transfusion following percutaneous coronary interventions

    Timothy D Kinnaird;Eugenio Stabile;Gary S Mintz;Cheol Whan Lee

  • American Society of Echocardiography: recommendations for evaluation of the severity of native valvular regurgitation with two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography

    W. A. Zoghbi;M. Enriquez-Sarano;E. Foster;P. A. Grayburn

Frequent Co-Authors

Gary S. Mintz
Gary S. Mintz Columbia University Medical Center
Ron Waksman
Ron Waksman MedStar Washington Hospital Center
Lowell F. Satler
Lowell F. Satler MedStar Washington Hospital Center
Augusto D. Pichard
Augusto D. Pichard Georgetown University
Kenneth M. Kent
Kenneth M. Kent MedStar Washington Hospital Center
Rebecca T. Hahn
Rebecca T. Hahn Columbia University Medical Center
Martin B. Leon
Martin B. Leon Columbia University Medical Center
Pamela S. Douglas
Pamela S. Douglas Duke University
Philippe Pibarot
Philippe Pibarot Université Laval
Paul A. Grayburn
Paul A. Grayburn Baylor University Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine doesn’t always require the traditional path of becoming a physician. There are numerous online degree options that let you enter vital roles within the healthcare industry—often faster and with more flexibility.

For those interested in healthcare technology and data management, health information technology programs online prepare you for careers that connect patient care with information systems. If you prefer roles in the administrative side of healthcare, a medical coding certification can open doors to jobs in hospitals, insurance companies, or private practices.

Looking to provide direct patient care? Several online nurse practitioner programs can help RNs earn an advanced degree and take on more responsibility. Others may consider starting with foundational qualifications from cheap online nursing programs, which offer affordable pathways into this high-demand field.

As healthcare continues to evolve, these online options make it easier than ever to find your fit in a meaningful, rewarding medical career.

Best Scientists Citing Neil J. Weissman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles