World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 95 9857 9249 5065 4680 448 54640

Rebecca T. Hahn publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Rebecca T. Hahn between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Rebecca T. Hahn published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 13.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 69 publications in 2021. 59 of the 470 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 69. Peak 69 publications in 2021. 1992: 2 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 3 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 3 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 0 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 0 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 34 publications 2014: 23 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 32 publications 2017: 36 publications 2018: 40 publications 2019: 58 publications 2020: 60 publications 2021: 69 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 59 publications
1992 2025

470 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Rebecca T. Hahn: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 2
1993 0
1994 0
1995 1
1996 3
1997 1
1998 1
1999 3
2000 3
2001 1
2002 0
2003 1
2004 1
2005 1
2006 0
2007 1
2008 0
2009 0
2010 3
2011 3
2012 15
2013 34
2014 23
2015 19
2016 32
2017 36
2018 40
2019 58
2020 60
2021 69
2022 0
2023 0
2024 0
2025 59
Total 470
Download as CSV

Rebecca T. Hahn publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rebecca T. Hahn sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 441–460 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 448 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771 448
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Rebecca T. Hahn D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rebecca T. Hahn sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 94–95 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808 95
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Rebecca T. Hahn is affiliated with Columbia University Medical Center in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the field of Medicine, with a concentrated focus on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. The depth of their work spans multiple specialized subfields, including Epidemiology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

The scientist's research addresses key topics such as Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments, Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors, Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management, Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics, Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair, Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches, and Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments.

Rebecca T. Hahn has contributed to a variety of publications, among which the most recent significant papers include:

  • Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: Updated Endpoint Definitions for Aortic Valve Clinical Research, 2021, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Five-Year Outcomes of Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement, 2020, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: updated endpoint definitions for aortic valve clinical research, 2020, European Heart Journal
  • Transcatheter Repair for Patients with Tricuspid Regurgitation, 2023, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Global evaluation of echocardiography in patients with COVID-19, 2020, European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging

Frequent collaborators in their work include Susheel Kodali, Martin B. Leon, Philippe Pîbarot, Michael J. Mack, and Isaac George. These coauthors reflect a network actively engaged in cardiovascular research and clinical advancements.

The primary venues in which Rebecca T. Hahn publishes encompass:

  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
  • JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging
  • European Heart Journal
  • Circulation

Best Publications

  • Updated standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 consensus document.

    A. Pieter Kappetein;Stuart J. Head;Philippe Généreux;Nicolo Piazza

  • Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients.

    Martin B Leon;Craig R. Smith;Michael J. Mack;Michael J. Mack;Rajendra Makkar

  • Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Balloon-Expandable Valve in Low-Risk Patients

    Michael J. Mack;Martin B. Leon;Vinod H. Thourani;Raj Makkar

  • Recommendations for Noninvasive Evaluation of Native Valvular Regurgitation: A Report from the American Society of Echocardiography Developed in Collaboration with the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

    William A. Zoghbi;David Adams;Robert O. Bonow;Maurice Enriquez-Sarano

  • Two-Year Outcomes after Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement

    Susheel K. Kodali;Mathew R. Williams;Craig R. Smith;Lars G. Svensson

  • Updated Standardized Endpoint Definitions for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

    A. Pieter Kappetein;Stuart J. Head;Philippe Généreux;Nicolo Piazza

  • Transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgical valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients: a propensity score analysis

    Vinod H. Thourani;Susheel Kodali;Raj R. Makkar;Howard C. Herrmann

  • Angiogenesis Gene Therapy Phase I Assessment of Direct Intramyocardial Administration of an Adenovirus Vector Expressing VEGF121 cDNA to Individuals With Clinically Significant Severe Coronary Artery Disease

    Todd K. Rosengart;Leonard Y. Lee;Shailen R. Patel;Timothy A. Sanborn

  • EAE/ASE recommendations for the use of echocardiography in new transcatheter interventions for valvular heart disease

    Jose L. Zamorano;Luigi P. Badano;Charles Bruce;Kwan Leung Chan

  • Unveiling transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis and its predictors among elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

    Adam Castaño;David L Narotsky;Nadira Hamid;Omar K Khalique

  • Five-Year Outcomes of Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement.

    Raj R. Makkar;Vinod H. Thourani;Michael J. Mack;Susheel K. Kodali

  • Staging classification of aortic stenosis based on the extent of cardiac damage.

    Philippe Généreux;Philippe Généreux;Philippe Pibarot;Björn Redfors;Michael J Mack

  • Brain derived neurotrophic factor is an endothelial cell survival factor required for intramyocardial vessel stabilization.

    M.J. Donovan;M.I. Lin;P. Wiegn;T. Ringstedt

  • Association of aortic dilation with regurgitant, stenotic and functionally normal bicuspid aortic valves.

    Rebecca T. Hahn;Mary J. Roman;Allen H. Mogtadek;Richard B. Devereux

  • Paravalvular Leak After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: The New Achilles' Heel? A Comprehensive Review of the Literature

    Philippe Généreux;Stuart J. Head;Rebecca Hahn;Benoit Daneault

  • The need for a new tricuspid regurgitation grading scheme

    Rebecca T Hahn;Jose L Zamorano

  • Biologic bypass with the use of adenovirus-mediated gene transfer of the complementary deoxyribonucleic acid for vascular endothelial growth factor 121 improves myocardial perfusion and function in the ischemic porcine heart

    Charles A. Mack;Shailen R. Patel;Eric A. Schwarz;Pat Zanzonico

  • Paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the Edwards sapien valve in the PARTNER trial: characterizing patients and impact on outcomes

    Susheel Kodali;Philippe Pibarot;Pamela S. Douglas;Mathew Williams

  • Predictors of Mortality and Outcomes of Therapy in Low-Flow Severe Aortic Stenosis A Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER) Trial Analysis

    Howard C. Herrmann;Philippe Pibarot;Irene Hueter;Zachary M. Gertz

  • Two-Year Outcomes After Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement

    Susheel K. Kodali;Mathew R. Williams;Craig R. Smith;Lars G. Svensson

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin B. Leon
Martin B. Leon Columbia University Medical Center
Susheel Kodali
Susheel Kodali Columbia University Medical Center
Philippe Pibarot
Philippe Pibarot Université Laval
Vinod H. Thourani
Vinod H. Thourani Georgetown University
Pamela S. Douglas
Pamela S. Douglas Duke University
John G. Webb
John G. Webb University of British Columbia
Samir R. Kapadia
Samir R. Kapadia Cleveland Clinic
Neil J. Weissman
Neil J. Weissman MedStar Health
Mathew R. Williams
Mathew R. Williams New York University
Raj Makkar
Raj Makkar Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are considering a career in medicine but are exploring alternative or supplementary pathways, there are several online degree options in nursing and healthcare. Many students interested in this field search for affordable programs, such as the phd nursing education online to advance their expertise or transition into teaching and leadership roles.

Cost is a significant factor for many prospective students. To save on tuition, you may want to explore the cheapest rn to bsn program options, which allow registered nurses to earn a bachelor’s degree and open more advanced clinical or management opportunities.

Non-nursing graduates interested in making a swift career change into healthcare can benefit from the non nursing bachelor's to msn online pathways, which streamline the process toward becoming a nurse for those with unrelated bachelor’s degrees.

Finally, if you are looking for programs with less competitive entry requirements, consider reviewing the easiest nursing programs to get into. This can help you start your healthcare journey as soon as possible, even if your academic background is not traditional.

Best Scientists Citing Rebecca T. Hahn

Trending Scientists