World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
95
Citations
54640
World Ranking
9857
National Ranking
5065

Rebecca T. Hahn publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rebecca T. Hahn sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 448 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Rebecca T. Hahn D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rebecca T. Hahn sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Rebecca T. Hahn is affiliated with Columbia University Medical Center in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the field of Medicine, with a concentrated focus on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. The depth of their work spans multiple specialized subfields, including Epidemiology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

The scientist's research addresses key topics such as Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments, Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors, Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management, Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics, Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair, Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches, and Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments.

Rebecca T. Hahn has contributed to a variety of publications, among which the most recent significant papers include:

  • Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: Updated Endpoint Definitions for Aortic Valve Clinical Research, 2021, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Five-Year Outcomes of Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement, 2020, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: updated endpoint definitions for aortic valve clinical research, 2020, European Heart Journal
  • Transcatheter Repair for Patients with Tricuspid Regurgitation, 2023, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Global evaluation of echocardiography in patients with COVID-19, 2020, European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging

Frequent collaborators in their work include Susheel Kodali, Martin B. Leon, Philippe Pîbarot, Michael J. Mack, and Isaac George. These coauthors reflect a network actively engaged in cardiovascular research and clinical advancements.

The primary venues in which Rebecca T. Hahn publishes encompass:

  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
  • JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging
  • European Heart Journal
  • Circulation

Best Publications

  • Updated standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 consensus document.

    A. Pieter Kappetein;Stuart J. Head;Philippe Généreux;Nicolo Piazza

  • Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients.

    Martin B Leon;Craig R. Smith;Michael J. Mack;Michael J. Mack;Rajendra Makkar

  • Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Balloon-Expandable Valve in Low-Risk Patients

    Michael J. Mack;Martin B. Leon;Vinod H. Thourani;Raj Makkar

  • Recommendations for Noninvasive Evaluation of Native Valvular Regurgitation: A Report from the American Society of Echocardiography Developed in Collaboration with the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

    William A. Zoghbi;David Adams;Robert O. Bonow;Maurice Enriquez-Sarano

  • Two-Year Outcomes after Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement

    Susheel K. Kodali;Mathew R. Williams;Craig R. Smith;Lars G. Svensson

  • Updated Standardized Endpoint Definitions for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

    A. Pieter Kappetein;Stuart J. Head;Philippe Généreux;Nicolo Piazza

  • Transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgical valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients: a propensity score analysis

    Vinod H. Thourani;Susheel Kodali;Raj R. Makkar;Howard C. Herrmann

  • Angiogenesis Gene Therapy Phase I Assessment of Direct Intramyocardial Administration of an Adenovirus Vector Expressing VEGF121 cDNA to Individuals With Clinically Significant Severe Coronary Artery Disease

    Todd K. Rosengart;Leonard Y. Lee;Shailen R. Patel;Timothy A. Sanborn

  • EAE/ASE recommendations for the use of echocardiography in new transcatheter interventions for valvular heart disease

    Jose L. Zamorano;Luigi P. Badano;Charles Bruce;Kwan Leung Chan

  • Unveiling transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis and its predictors among elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

    Adam Castaño;David L Narotsky;Nadira Hamid;Omar K Khalique

  • Five-Year Outcomes of Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement.

    Raj R. Makkar;Vinod H. Thourani;Michael J. Mack;Susheel K. Kodali

  • Staging classification of aortic stenosis based on the extent of cardiac damage.

    Philippe Généreux;Philippe Généreux;Philippe Pibarot;Björn Redfors;Michael J Mack

  • Brain derived neurotrophic factor is an endothelial cell survival factor required for intramyocardial vessel stabilization.

    M.J. Donovan;M.I. Lin;P. Wiegn;T. Ringstedt

  • Association of aortic dilation with regurgitant, stenotic and functionally normal bicuspid aortic valves.

    Rebecca T. Hahn;Mary J. Roman;Allen H. Mogtadek;Richard B. Devereux

  • Paravalvular Leak After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: The New Achilles' Heel? A Comprehensive Review of the Literature

    Philippe Généreux;Stuart J. Head;Rebecca Hahn;Benoit Daneault

  • The need for a new tricuspid regurgitation grading scheme

    Rebecca T Hahn;Jose L Zamorano

  • Biologic bypass with the use of adenovirus-mediated gene transfer of the complementary deoxyribonucleic acid for vascular endothelial growth factor 121 improves myocardial perfusion and function in the ischemic porcine heart

    Charles A. Mack;Shailen R. Patel;Eric A. Schwarz;Pat Zanzonico

  • Paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the Edwards sapien valve in the PARTNER trial: characterizing patients and impact on outcomes

    Susheel Kodali;Philippe Pibarot;Pamela S. Douglas;Mathew Williams

  • Predictors of Mortality and Outcomes of Therapy in Low-Flow Severe Aortic Stenosis A Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER) Trial Analysis

    Howard C. Herrmann;Philippe Pibarot;Irene Hueter;Zachary M. Gertz

  • Two-Year Outcomes After Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement

    Susheel K. Kodali;Mathew R. Williams;Craig R. Smith;Lars G. Svensson

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin B. Leon
Martin B. Leon Columbia University Medical Center
Susheel Kodali
Susheel Kodali Columbia University Medical Center
Philippe Pibarot
Philippe Pibarot Université Laval
Vinod H. Thourani
Vinod H. Thourani Georgetown University
Pamela S. Douglas
Pamela S. Douglas Duke University
John G. Webb
John G. Webb University of British Columbia
Samir R. Kapadia
Samir R. Kapadia Cleveland Clinic
Neil J. Weissman
Neil J. Weissman MedStar Health
Mathew R. Williams
Mathew R. Williams New York University
Raj Makkar
Raj Makkar Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are considering a career in medicine but are exploring alternative or supplementary pathways, there are several online degree options in nursing and healthcare. Many students interested in this field search for affordable programs, such as the phd nursing education online to advance their expertise or transition into teaching and leadership roles.

Cost is a significant factor for many prospective students. To save on tuition, you may want to explore the cheapest rn to bsn program options, which allow registered nurses to earn a bachelor’s degree and open more advanced clinical or management opportunities.

Non-nursing graduates interested in making a swift career change into healthcare can benefit from the non nursing bachelor's to msn online pathways, which streamline the process toward becoming a nurse for those with unrelated bachelor’s degrees.

Finally, if you are looking for programs with less competitive entry requirements, consider reviewing the easiest nursing programs to get into. This can help you start your healthcare journey as soon as possible, even if your academic background is not traditional.

Best Scientists Citing Rebecca T. Hahn

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles