World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
40
Citations
10008
World Ranking
5233
National Ranking
885

Tim Forsyth publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tim Forsyth sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 162 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Tim Forsyth D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tim Forsyth sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tim Forsyth is affiliated with the London School of Economics and Political Science in the United Kingdom. Their research spans environmental science and social sciences, with a focus on the intersection of sociology, political science, and global environmental challenges.

Their work includes contributions to the subfields of sociology and political science, global and planetary change, political science and international relations, economics and econometrics, and management, monitoring, policy and law.

Key topics covered in Forsyth's research encompass sustainability and climate change governance, conservation, biodiversity and resource management, economic and environmental valuation, Asian geopolitics and ethnography, Cambodian history and society, environmental philosophy and ethics, and climate change and health impacts.

Forsyth has published in a variety of venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • Conservation Biology
  • Political Geography
  • Environmental Conservation
  • Environmental Science & Policy
  • One Earth

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Forsyth include:

  • "When climate justice goes wrong: Maladaptation and deep co-production in transformative environmental science and policy," 2022, Political Geography
  • "Are landscape approaches possible under authoritarianism? Multi-stakeholder governance and social transformation in Myanmar," 2021, Environmental Science & Policy

Other papers from the broader collaboration network include:

  • "An agenda for research and action toward diverse and just futures for life on Earth," 2020, Conservation Biology
  • "Who gets to imagine transformative change? Participation and representation in biodiversity assessments," 2020, Environmental Conservation
  • "Urgent need to move toward solution-orientated environmental assessments," 2022, One Earth

Forsyth frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including:

  • Silke Beck
  • Carina Wyborn
  • Nicole Kalas
  • Sarah Clément
  • Elena Louder

Best Publications

  • Critical Political Ecology: The Politics of Environmental Science

    Timothy Forsyth

  • Who speaks for the future of Earth?: how critical social science can extend the conversation on the Anthropocene

    Eva Lövbrand;Silke Beck;Jason Chilvers;Tim Forsyth

  • Beyond Technical Fixes: climate solutions and the great derangement

    Andrea Joslyn Nightingale;Siri Eriksen;Marcus Taylor;Timothy Forsyth

  • Forest Guardians, Forest Destroyers: The Politics of Environmental Knowledge in Northern Thailand

    Tim Forsyth;Andrew Walker

  • Political ecology and the epistemology of social justice

    Tim Forsyth

  • Community-Based Adaptation to Climate Change

    Jessica Ayers;Tim Forsyth

  • Community-based adaptation to climate change: strengthening resilience through development.

    J. Ayers;T. Forsyth

  • Critical Political Ecology

    Tim Forsyth

  • Science, myth and knowledge: Testing himalayan environmental degradation in Thailand

    Timothy Forsyth

  • Environmental transformations in developing countries: hybrid research and democratic policy

    S Batterbury;T Forsyth;K Thomson

  • Community-based adaptation: a review of past and future challenges

    Tim Forsyth

  • In the Eyes of the State: Negotiating a “Rights-Based Approach” to Forest Conservation in Thailand

    Craig Johnson;Timothy Forsyth

  • Reductionist and integrative research approaches to complex water security policy challenges

    Mark Zeitoun;Bruce Lankford;Tobias Krueger;Tim Forsyth

  • Environmental Responsibility and Business Regulation: the case of sustainable tourism

    Timothy Forsyth

  • Public concerns about transboundary haze: a comparison of Indonesia, Singapore, and Malaysia

    Tim Forsyth

  • Elinor Ostrom's Legacy: Governing the Commons and the Rational Choice Controversy

    Tim Forsyth;Craig Johnson

  • Fighting back: human adaptations in marginal environments

    Simon Batterbury;Tim Forsyth

  • Critical realism and political ecology

    Tim Forsyth

  • Encyclopedia of International Development

    Tim Forsyth

  • MOUNTAIN MYTHS REVISITED: INTEGRATING NATURAL AND SOCIAL ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE

    Timothy Forsyth

Frequent Co-Authors

Melissa Leach
Melissa Leach Cambridge Conservation Initiative (CCI)
Ian Scoones
Ian Scoones University of Sussex
Katrina Brown
Katrina Brown University of Exeter
Siri Eriksen
Siri Eriksen Norwegian University of Life Sciences
Emily Boyd
Emily Boyd Lund University
Mark Pelling
Mark Pelling King's College London
Christopher A. Scott
Christopher A. Scott University of Arizona
Arjen Ysbert Hoekstra
Arjen Ysbert Hoekstra University of Twente
Olli Varis
Olli Varis Aalto University
Fredolin Tangang
Fredolin Tangang National University of Malaysia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The field of Social Sciences and Humanities offers diverse online degree options to fit a wide range of career goals and budgets. If you are interested in psychology, choosing the cheapest online psychology degree can help you gain a solid foundation without significant financial strain. These programs are ideal if you are seeking affordability without compromising on quality.

For those drawn to helping professions, accredited masters in social work online programs provide accessible pathways to careers in counseling, community advocacy, and social services. Many options have flexible entry requirements and are designed for working adults.

Aspiring clinical psychologists can consider psyd online programs, which focus on practical, hands-on clinical training for licensure. These programs often emphasize real-world experience, supporting students who wish to work in school, hospital, or private practice settings.

If your interest lies in marriage and family therapy, the mft online programs provide some of the quickest pathways to becoming a credentialed therapist. Many of these programs are streamlined to help students enter the workforce sooner.

Best Scientists Citing Tim Forsyth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles