World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Christopher A. Scott

Christopher A. Scott

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
52
Citations
11136
World Ranking
4444
National Ranking
1655

Christopher A. Scott publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christopher A. Scott sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 239 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Christopher A. Scott D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christopher A. Scott sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Christopher A. Scott is affiliated with the University of Arizona in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with a specialization in water science and technology. Their work also covers related subfields including global and planetary change, sociology and political science, ocean engineering, and political science and international relations.

The scientist has contributed notably to topics such as Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies, water resources management and optimization, energy and environment impacts, transboundary water resource management, water governance and infrastructure, climate variability and models, and hydrology and watershed management studies.

Some of their recent publications include:

  • A scale-based framework to understand the promises, pitfalls and paradoxes of irrigation efficiency to meet major water challenges, 2020, Global Environmental Change
  • Hydro-energy cooperation in South Asia: Prospects for transboundary energy and water security, 2020, Environmental Science & Policy
  • Hydrodiplomacy and adaptive governance at the U.S.-Mexico border: 75 years of tradition and innovation in transboundary water management, 2020, Environmental Science & Policy
  • Determining the quasi monsoon front in the Indian Himalayas, 2021, Quaternary International
  • Do ecosystem insecurity and social vulnerability lead to failure of water security?, 2020, Environmental Development

The venues where this researcher frequently publishes include:

  • Environmental Science & Policy
  • Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
  • Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
  • Environmental Development
  • Journal of Arid Environments

Among their frequent co-authors are Adriana A. Zúñiga-Terán, Andrew J. Deek, Padmendra Shrestha, Rolando Díaz, and Devin J. Clegg.

Best Publications

  • The Water-Energy-Food Nexus: A systematic review of methods for nexus assessment

    Tamee R Albrecht;Arica Crootof;Christopher A Scott

  • Poverty Measurement and Analysis

    Luc Christiaensen;Christopher Scott;Quentin Wodon

  • Policy and institutional dimensions of the water–energy nexus

    Christopher A. Scott;Suzanne A. Pierce;Martin J. Pasqualetti;Alice L. Jones

  • Socio‐hydrology: Use‐inspired water sustainability science for the Anthropocene

    M. Sivapalan;M. Konar;V. Srinivasan;A. Chhatre

  • Wastewater Use in Irrigated Agriculture: Confronting the Livelihood and Environmental Realities

    Christopher A. Scott;Naser I Faruqui;L. Raschid-Sally

  • Wastewater irrigation and health: assessing and mitigating risk in low-income countries

    Christopher A. Scott;Pay Drechsel;Liqa Raschid-Sally;Akissa Bahri

  • Modeling water resources management at the basin level: review and future directions

    D.C. McKinney;Xueliang Cai;Mark W. Rosegrant;Claudia Ringler

  • Energy-irrigation nexus in South Asia: Improving groundwater conservation and power sector viability

    Tushaar" "Shah;Christopher A Scott;Avinash Kishore;Abhishek Sharma

  • The Water-Energy-Food Nexus: Enhancing Adaptive Capacity to Complex Global Challenges

    Christopher A. Scott;Mathew Kurian;James L. Wescoat

  • Wastewater use in irrigated agriculture: management challenges in developing countries.

    C. A. Scott;N. I. Faruqui;L. Raschid-Sally

  • Groundwater overdraft reduction through agricultural energy policy: insights from India and Mexico

    Christopher A. Scott;Tushaar Shah

  • Irrigation efficiency and water-policy implications for river basin resilience

    C. A. Scott;S. Vicuña;I. Blanco-Gutiérrez;F. Meza

  • Reductionist and integrative research approaches to complex water security policy challenges

    Mark Zeitoun;Bruce Lankford;Tobias Krueger;Tim Forsyth

  • Drinking Wastewater Public Trust in Potable Reuse

    Kerri Jean Ormerod;Christopher A. Scott

  • Irrigated area mapping in heterogeneous landscapes with MODIS time series, ground truth and census data, Krishna Basin, India

    Trent W. Biggs;Prasad S. Thenkabail;Murali K. Gumma;Christopher A. Scott

  • Spatial variation in water supply and demand across river basins of India

    Upali A. Amarasinghe;Bharat R. Sharma;Noel Aloysius;Christopher Scott

  • Mapping root zone soil moisture using remotely sensed optical imagery

    Christopher A. Scott;Wim G.M. Bastiaanssen;Mobin ud Din Ahmad

  • Water security: A review of place-based research

    Andrea K. Gerlak;Lily House-Peters;Robert G. Varady;Tamee Albrecht

  • The water‐energy‐climate nexus: Resources and policy outlook for aquifers in Mexico

    Christopher A. Scott

  • Water Security and Adaptive Management in the Arid Americas

    Christopher A. Scott;Francisco J. Meza;Robert G. Varady;Holm Tiessen

  • Urban wastewater reuse for crop production in the water-short Guanajuato river basin, Mexico.

    Christopher A. Scott;J.A. Zarazua;G. Levine

  • Adapting Across Boundaries: Climate Change, Social Learning, and Resilience in the U.S.–Mexico Border Region

    Margaret Wilder;Christopher A. Scott;Nicolás Pineda Pablos;Robert G. Varady

Frequent Co-Authors

Quentin Wodon
Quentin Wodon World Bank
Pay Drechsel
Pay Drechsel International Water Management Institute
Trent W. Biggs
Trent W. Biggs San Diego State University
Tushaar Shah
Tushaar Shah International Water Management Institute
Hugh Turral
Hugh Turral International Water Management Institute
Philippus Wester
Philippus Wester International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development
Manzoor Qadir
Manzoor Qadir McMaster University
Duncan Mara
Duncan Mara University of Leeds
Prasad S. Thenkabail
Prasad S. Thenkabail United States Geological Survey

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens the door to diverse career opportunities, but students often explore related fields to enhance their knowledge and job prospects. For those seeking versatile options, an accredited affordable online general studies degree provides a flexible pathway to build a broad academic foundation while managing cost and accessibility.

Many students are drawn to programs that balance rigor with manageability. By considering the easiest bachelor degree programs, learners can find degrees that align with their skills and interests, allowing them to graduate on time and enter the workforce efficiently.

Specialized degrees like the best online geology degree are excellent choices for students passionate about earth sciences and environmental research. These programs often incorporate field studies and technical training essential for careers in environmental consulting, resource management, and beyond.

Another emerging area is Geographic Information Systems (GIS), a critical tool in environmental analysis and planning. Pursuing a gis degree equips students with the skills to map, analyze, and visualize data, broadening career pathways in environmental management, urban planning, and disaster response.

Best Scientists Citing Christopher A. Scott

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles