World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
130
Citations
57530
World Ranking
2504
National Ranking
1411

Thomas D. Koepsell publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas D. Koepsell sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 470 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Thomas D. Koepsell D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas D. Koepsell sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 130 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas D. Koepsell is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the medical field, with a significant contribution to oncology. The subfields of study in which they have published include oncology, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, pathology and forensic medicine, surgery, and epidemiology.

The scientist's work covers a range of main topics, notably colorectal cancer screening and detection, gastric cancer management and outcomes, genetic factors in colorectal cancer, colorectal cancer surgical treatments, global cancer incidence and screening, pancreatic and hepatic oncology research, and diverticular disease and complications.

Among the recent papers authored or coauthored by Thomas D. Koepsell are:

  • Next-Generation Multitarget Stool DNA Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening, 2024, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Cost Effectiveness of Different Strategies for Detecting Cirrhosis in Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Based on United States Health Care System, 2020, Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
  • Early-Age Onset Colorectal Neoplasia in Average-Risk Individuals Undergoing Screening Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, 2021, Gastroenterology
  • Specificity of the Multi-Target Stool DNA Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Average-Risk 45-49 Year-Olds: A Cross-Sectional Study, 2021, Cancer Prevention Research
  • AGA White Paper: Roadmap for the Future of Colorectal Cancer Screening in the United States, 2020, Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology

The frequent coauthors collaborating with Thomas D. Koepsell include:

  • Timothy E. Stump
  • Patrick O. Monahan
  • Charles J. Kahi
  • Barry C. Barker
  • Laura J. Myers

Publication venues where Thomas D. Koepsell has frequently published include:

  • Gastroenterology
  • The American Journal of Gastroenterology
  • Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
  • Annals of Internal Medicine
  • JAMA Network Open

Overall, Thomas D. Koepsell's research contributions are centered on cancer detection and management, particularly colorectal cancer. They have a substantial presence in leading journals within gastroenterology and oncology, collaborating extensively with peers in these fields.

Best Publications

  • The validity of self-reported smoking: a review and meta-analysis.

    Donald L. Patrick;Allen Cheadle;Diane C. Thompson;Paula Diehr

  • Release from Prison — A High Risk of Death for Former Inmates

    Ingrid A. Binswanger;Marc F. Stern;Richard A. Deyo;Patrick J. Heagerty

  • The Risk of Myocardial Infarction Associated With Antihypertensive Drug Therapies

    Bruce M. Psaty;Susan R. Heckbert;Thomas D. Koepsell;David S. Siscovick

  • Health Outcomes Associated with Antihypertensive Therapies Used as First-Line Agents: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    Bruce M. Psaty;Nicholas L. Smith;David S. Siscovick;Thomas D. Koepsell

  • Patient-physician racial concordance and the perceived quality and use of health care.

    Somnath Saha;Miriam Komaromy;Thomas D. Koepsell;Andrew B. Bindman

  • The National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) database: the Uniform Data Set.

    Duane L. Beekly;Erin M. Ramos;William W. Lee;Woodrow D. Deitrich

  • Has misdiagnosis of appendicitis decreased over time? A population-based analysis.

    David R. Flum;Arden Morris;Thomas Koepsell;E. Patchen Dellinger

  • Have outcomes of incisional hernia repair improved with time? A population-based analysis.

    David R. Flum;Karen Horvath;Thomas Koepsell

  • Association of the Built Environment With Physical Activity and Obesity in Older Persons

    Ethan M. Berke;Thomas D. Koepsell;Anne Vernez Moudon;Richard E. Hoskins

  • A general method of compliance assessment using centralized pharmacy records. Description and validation.

    John F. Steiner;Thomas D. Koepsell;Stephan D. Fihn;Thomas S. Inui

  • Physicians' Experience with the Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome as a Factor in Patients' Survival

    Mari M. Kitahata;Thomas D. Koepsell;Richard A. Deyo;Clare L. Maxwell

  • Deaths attributed to pediatric complex chronic conditions: national trends and implications for supportive care services.

    Chris Feudtner;Ross M. Hays;Gerri Haynes;J. Russell Geyer

  • Effectiveness of a Violence Prevention Curriculum Among Children in Elementary School: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    David C. Grossman;Holly J. Neckerman;Thomas D. Koepsell;Ping-Yu Liu

  • Risk factors for amputation in patients with diabetes mellitus. A case-control study.

    Gayle E. Reiber;Roger E. Pecoraro;Thomas D. Koepsell

  • Intraoperative cholangiography and risk of common bile duct injury during cholecystectomy.

    David R. Flum;E. Patchen Dellinger;Allen Cheadle;Leighton Chan

  • Diuretic Therapy for Hypertension and the Risk of Primary Cardiac Arrest

    David S. Siscovick;T. E. Raghunathan;Bruce M. Psaty;Thomas D. Koepsell

  • Relationship of hearing impairment to dementia and cognitive dysfunction in older adults.

    Richard F. Uhlmann;Eric B. Larson;Thomas S. Rees;Thomas D. Koepsell

  • Lessons from a trial of acupuncture and massage for low back pain: patient expectations and treatment effects.

    Donna Kalauokalani;Daniel C. Cherkin;Karen J. Sherman;Thomas D. Koepsell

  • THE CLINICAL AND ECONOMIC CORRELATES OF MISDIAGNOSED APPENDICITIS: NATIONWIDE ANALYSIS

    David R. Flum;Thomas Koepsell

  • Factor V Leiden (resistance to activated protein C) increases the risk of myocardial infarction in young women

    F. R. Rosendaal;D. S. Siscovick;S. M. Schwartz;R. K. Beverly

Frequent Co-Authors

Frederick P. Rivara
Frederick P. Rivara University of Washington
Bruce M. Psaty
Bruce M. Psaty University of Washington
Noel S. Weiss
Noel S. Weiss University of Washington
W. T. Longstreth
W. T. Longstreth University of Washington
Walter A. Kukull
Walter A. Kukull Washington University in St. Louis
Janet R. Daling
Janet R. Daling Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
David S. Siscovick
David S. Siscovick University of Washington
Susan J. Curry
Susan J. Curry University of Iowa
Richard A. Deyo
Richard A. Deyo Oregon Health & Science University
Susan R. Heckbert
Susan R. Heckbert University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are interested in Medicine but looking for flexible education options, many related online degrees can help you build a rewarding career in healthcare and beyond. Degrees like the best online food science degree are ideal if you are passionate about nutrition and wellness, opening doors to fields such as dietetics or food safety.

For those aiming for leadership positions in healthcare, consider exploring what's the best online mha program for working adults. These programs are designed for busy professionals seeking advanced management skills without disrupting their careers.

Registered nurses seeking to advance their qualifications can find accessible options like an rn to bsn with no clinicals program. These online pathways help nurses upskill and expand their professional opportunities.

For nurses desiring the highest-level credentials, the fastest msn to dnp program can accelerate your journey to advanced practice and leadership roles.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas D. Koepsell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles