World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Emily Boyd

Emily Boyd

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
52
Citations
11309
World Ranking
4439
National Ranking
84

Emily Boyd publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emily Boyd sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 169 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Emily Boyd D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emily Boyd sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Emily Boyd is affiliated with Lund University in Sweden and focuses their academic work on interdisciplinary research at the intersection of environmental science and social sciences. Their research integrates topics related to climate change, adaptation, governance, and social impacts.

Their recent publication record includes papers such as:

  • "Stop blaming the climate for disasters," 2022, published in Communications Earth & Environment
  • "Loss and Damage and limits to adaptation: recent IPCC insights and implications for climate science and policy," 2020, published in Sustainability Science
  • "Loss and damage from climate change: A new climate justice agenda," 2021, published in One Earth
  • "Towards a bridging concept for undesirable resilience in social-ecological systems," 2020, published in Global Sustainability
  • "Unearthing the myths of global sustainable forest governance," 2020, published in Global Sustainability

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Emily Boyd include:

  • Murray Scown
  • Emmanuel Raju
  • Brian C. Chaffin
  • W. Neil Adger
  • Anita Fábos

Their publications appear most often in the following venues:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Global Sustainability
  • World Development
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability

Emily Boyd's main fields of study include:

  • Environmental Science
  • Social Sciences

Within these fields, their research subfields also encompass:

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
  • Economics and Econometrics

The primary topical focus areas of their work are:

  • Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration
  • Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Disaster Management and Resilience
  • Climate Change and Geoengineering
  • Climate change impacts on agriculture
  • Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
  • Flood Risk Assessment and Management

Best Publications

  • Resilience and vulnerability: Complementary or conflicting concepts?

    Fiona Miller;Henny Osbahr;Emily Boyd;Emily Boyd;Frank Thomalla

  • Storylines: an alternative approach to representing uncertainty in physical aspects of climate change

    Theodore G. Shepherd;Emily Boyd;Raphael A. Calel;Raphael A. Calel;Sandra C. Chapman;Sandra C. Chapman

  • Exploring social barriers to adaptation: Insights from Western Nepal

    Lindsey Jones;Emily Boyd

  • Observed adaptation to climate change: UK evidence of transition to a well-adapting society

    Emma L. Tompkins;Emma L. Tompkins;W. Neil Adger;Emily Boyd;Emily Boyd;Sophie Nicholson-Cole

  • Beyond Technical Fixes: climate solutions and the great derangement

    Andrea Joslyn Nightingale;Siri Eriksen;Marcus Taylor;Timothy Forsyth

  • Reforming the CDM for sustainable development: lessons learned and policy futures.

    Emily Boyd;Emily Boyd;Nate Hultman;J. Timmons Roberts;Esteve Corbera

  • Linking Futures across Scales: a Dialog on Multiscale Scenarios

    Reinette Biggs;Ciara Raudsepp-Hearne;Carol Atkinson-Palombo;Erin Bohensky

  • Using expert elicitation to define successful adaptation to climate change

    Miguel de França Doria;Emily Boyd;Emma L. Tompkins;W. Neil Adger

  • Building climate resilience: Lessons of early warning in Africa

    E. Boyd;E. Boyd;Rosalind J. Cornforth

  • Anticipatory governance for social-ecological resilience

    Emily Boyd;Björn Nykvist;Björn Nykvist;Sara Borgström;Izabela A. Stacewicz

  • Developing adaptation and adapting development

    Maria Carmen Lemos;Maria Carmen Lemos;Emily Boyd;Emma L. Tompkins;Henny Osbahr

  • Stop blaming the climate for disasters

    Unknown

  • Small-scale forest carbon projects: Adapting CDM to low-income communities

    Emily Boyd;Maria Gutierrez;Manyu Chang

  • Adapting Institutions: Governance, Complexity and Social-Ecological Resilience

    Emily Boyd;Carl Folke

  • Adaptive climate change governance for urban resilience

    Emily Boyd;Sirkku Juhola

  • Characterizing loss and damage from climate change

    Rachel James;Friedericke Otto;Hannah Parker;Emily Boyd

  • Governing the Clean Development Mechanism: Global Rhetoric versus Local Realities in Carbon Sequestration Projects

    Emily Boyd

  • Can REDD+ reconcile local priorities and needs with global mitigation benefits? Lessons from angai forest, Tanzania

    Irmeli Mustalahti;Anna Bolin;Emily Boyd;Jouni Paavola

  • A typology of loss and damage perspectives

    Emily Boyd;Emily Boyd;Rachel A. James;Rachel A. James;Richard G. Jones;Richard G. Jones;Hannah R. Young

  • Overcoming undesirable resilience in the global food system

    Tom H. Oliver;Emily Boyd;Kelvin Balcombe;Tim G. Benton

  • Surviving climate change in small islands. A guidebook

    Emma L. Tompkins;Sophie Nicholson-Cole;Lisa-Ann Hurlston;Emily Boyd

  • Resilience and 'Climatizing' Development: Examples and policy implications

    Emily Boyd;Henny Osbahr;Polly J Ericksen;Emma L Tompkins

Frequent Co-Authors

Emma L. Tompkins
Emma L. Tompkins University of Southampton
Yadvinder Malhi
Yadvinder Malhi University of Oxford
Sirkku Juhola
Sirkku Juhola University of Helsinki
Myles R. Allen
Myles R. Allen University of Oxford
Friederike E. L. Otto
Friederike E. L. Otto University of Oxford
Ken Norris
Ken Norris Zoological Society of London
Peter Newell
Peter Newell University of Sussex
Diana Liverman
Diana Liverman University of Arizona
Nigel W. Arnell
Nigel W. Arnell University of Reading

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students pursuing Environmental Sciences in the USA have a variety of related online degree options that can complement their studies and expand career opportunities. For those interested in leadership and public policy, exploring 1 year mpa online programs can provide valuable skills in management and administration, essential for environmental governance roles.

Another relevant field is sociology, which offers insight into human-environment interactions. An online bachelors in sociology allows students to understand community dynamics and social impacts of environmental issues, enriching their perspective on sustainable solutions.

For professionals aiming to reach the highest academic levels without the traditional dissertation process, 1 year phd programs online no dissertation might be a practical pathway. This can facilitate advanced research and leadership roles in environmental education or policy implementation.

Educators and administrators looking to advance further may consider online eds to edd programs, which offer flexible routes to doctoral degrees, enabling them to impact environmental education strategies and institutional leadership effectively.

Best Scientists Citing Emily Boyd

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles