World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 56 3578 3419 1365 1261 163 16316

Hallie Eakin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Hallie Eakin between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Hallie Eakin published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 6.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2021. 8 of the 181 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2021. 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 3 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 21 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 4 publications
1999 2025

181 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Hallie Eakin: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 2
2000 1
2001 0
2002 2
2003 2
2004 1
2005 3
2006 6
2007 2
2008 3
2009 9
2010 4
2011 8
2012 6
2013 12
2014 10
2015 10
2016 9
2017 6
2018 16
2019 10
2020 16
2021 21
2022 10
2023 4
2024 4
2025 4
Total 181
Download as CSV

Hallie Eakin publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hallie Eakin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–170 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 163 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444 163
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Hallie Eakin D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hallie Eakin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202 56
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Hallie Eakin is affiliated with Arizona State University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science and Social Sciences, with significant work also contributed to subfields such as Global and Planetary Change, Sociology and Political Science, Ocean Engineering, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, and Nutrition and Dietetics.

The topics of their research include:

  • Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Water resources management and optimization
  • Climate change impacts on agriculture
  • Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration
  • Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Disaster Management and Resilience
  • Land Use and Ecosystem Services

Frequent publication venues for Eakin's work include:

  • Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
  • Regional Environmental Change
  • Environmental Research Letters
  • npj Urban Sustainability
  • World Development

Key recent papers by Hallie Eakin include:

  • "Transformations to sustainability: combining structural, systemic and enabling approaches" (2020) in Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
  • "What are the ingredients for food systems change towards sustainability?-Insights from the literature" (2020) in Environmental Research Letters
  • "IPCC's current conceptualization of 'vulnerability' needs more clarification for climate change vulnerability assessments" (2021) in Journal of Environmental Management
  • "The role of institutional entrepreneurs and informal land transactions in Mexico City's urban expansion" (2021) in World Development
  • "Critical minerals for electric vehicles: a telecoupling review" (2021) in Environmental Research Letters

Frequent co-authors working alongside Eakin include Luís Tapia, P. S. Jagadish, Rebecca Shelton, Ileana Grave, and Bertha Hernández Aguilar.

Hallie Eakin has contributed to book publications as well. One of the known titles is Weathering Risk in Rural Mexico, published by the University of Arizona Press in 2022.

Best Publications

  • Assessing the Vulnerability of Social-Environmental Systems

    Hallie Eakin;Amy Lynd Luers

  • Reconceptualising adaptation to climate change as part of pathways of change and response

    R. M. Wise;I. Fazey;M. Stafford Smith;S. E. Park

  • Reframing adaptation: The political nature of climate change adaptation

    Siri H. Eriksen;Andrea J. Nightingale;Hallie Eakin

  • Institutional change, climate risk, and rural vulnerability: Cases from Central Mexico

    Hallie Eakin

  • Resilience implications of policy responses to climate change

    W. Neil Adger;Katrina Brown;Donald R. Nelson;Fikret Berkes

  • Nested and teleconnected vulnerabilities to environmental change

    W Neil Adger;Hallie Eakin;Alexandra Winkels

  • Differentiating capacities as a means to sustainable climate change adaptation

    Hallie Eakin;M. C. Lemos;D. R. Nelson

  • Insights into the composition of household vulnerability from multicriteria decision analysis

    Hallie Eakin;Luis A. Bojórquez-Tapia

  • Adaptation and the state: Latin America and the challenge of capacity-building under globalization

    Hallie Eakin;Maria Carmen Lemos

  • Perceptions of risk and adaptation: Coffee producers, market shocks, and extreme weather in Central America and Mexico

    Catherine M. Tucker;Hallie Eakin;Edwin J. Castellanos

  • Potential Impacts of Climate Change on Agriculture: A Case of Study of Coffee Production in Veracruz, Mexico

    F. Estrada;C. Conde;H. Eakin

  • Towards a climate change adaptation strategy for coffee communities and ecosystems in the Sierra Madre de Chiapas, Mexico

    Götz Schroth;Peter Laderach;Jan Dempewolf;Stacy Philpott

  • Social identity, perception and motivation in adaptation to climate risk in the coffee sector of Chiapas, Mexico

    Elisa Frank;Hallie Eakin;David López-Carr

  • Managing private and public adaptation to climate change

    Emma L. Tompkins;Hallie Eakin

  • Socio-environmental impacts of lithium mineral extraction: towards a research agenda

    Datu Buyung Agusdinata;Wenjuan Liu;Hallie Eakin;Hugo Romero

  • An obsolete dichotomy? Rethinking the rural-urban interface in terms of food security and production in the global south

    Amy M Lerner;Hallie Eakin

  • Responding to the coffee crisis: a pilot study of farmers’ adaptations in Mexico, Guatemala and Honduras

    Hallie Eakin;Catherine Tucker;Edwin Castellanos

  • Nested vulnerability:exploring cross-scale linkages and vulnerability teleconnections in Mexican and Vietnamese coffee systems

    Hallie Eakin;Alexandra Winkels;Jan Sendzimir

  • Smallholder maize production and climatic risk: a case study from Mexico.

    Hallie Eakin

  • Transformations to Sustainability

    Ian Scoones;Andy Stirling;Dinesh Abrol;Joanes Atela

  • Towards a climate change adaptation strategy for coffee communities and ecosystems in the Sierra Madre de Chiapas, Mexico [Approved article]

    Gotz Schroth;Peter Laderach;Jan Dempewolf;Stacy Philpott

Frequent Co-Authors

Marco A. Janssen
Marco A. Janssen Arizona State University
Per Olsson
Per Olsson Stockholm Resilience Centre
Siri Eriksen
Siri Eriksen Norwegian University of Life Sciences
John M. Anderies
John M. Anderies Arizona State University
Tom Evans
Tom Evans University of Arizona
Anette Reenberg
Anette Reenberg University of Copenhagen
Claudia Pahl-Wostl
Claudia Pahl-Wostl Osnabrück University
Ann P. Kinzig
Ann P. Kinzig Arizona State University
Emma L. Tompkins
Emma L. Tompkins University of Southampton
Eric F. Lambin
Eric F. Lambin Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond Environmental Sciences, several related online degree options can enhance career prospects. Exploring the best online bachelor degree in sociology programs offers a foundational understanding of social dynamics that influence environmental policies and community action.

Education professionals looking to advance can consider accredited eds to edd programs, which provide a seamless pathway from a master's level to a doctoral degree. Many of these programs offer flexibility with options like online edd no dissertation, enabling students to earn their doctorate without the traditional dissertation requirement.

Social work also plays a vital role in addressing environmental justice and community resilience. Students seeking advanced qualifications might explore online dsw programs in social work, which are often designed to be affordable and accessible, allowing professionals to enhance their impact on vulnerable populations connected to environmental issues.

Each of these pathways complements a career in environmental sciences by integrating social, educational, and policy perspectives. Combining these disciplines through flexible online degree programs equips graduates to better tackle complex environmental challenges in diverse roles.

For more information, visit the best online bachelor degree in sociology, explore online edd no dissertation options, check out accredited eds to edd programs, and review the online dsw programs in social work.

Best Scientists Citing Hallie Eakin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles