World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Andrea Nardini

Andrea Nardini

Award Badge
Plant Science and Agronomy
Italy
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 72 635 586 12 12 188 17733

Andrea Nardini publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Andrea Nardini between 1985 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Andrea Nardini published across 41 years, from 1985 to 2025, averaging 5.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2019. 15 of the 238 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2019. 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 4 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 7 publications
1985 2025

238 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Andrea Nardini: publications per year, 1985 to 2025
Year Publications
1985 1
1986 0
1987 0
1988 1
1989 0
1990 0
1991 1
1992 1
1993 0
1994 1
1995 1
1996 1
1997 4
1998 5
1999 4
2000 5
2001 5
2002 4
2003 11
2004 7
2005 7
2006 2
2007 7
2008 5
2009 4
2010 5
2011 7
2012 9
2013 6
2014 12
2015 8
2016 14
2017 11
2018 12
2019 18
2020 12
2021 13
2022 11
2023 8
2024 8
2025 7
Total 238
Download as CSV

Andrea Nardini publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrea Nardini sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 186–190 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 188 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114 188
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Andrea Nardini D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrea Nardini sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 72 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38 72
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Plant Science and Agronomy in Italy Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Plant Science and Agronomy in Italy Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Plant Science and Agronomy in Italy Leader Award

Overview

What is she best known for?

The fields of study she is best known for:

  • Botany
  • Ecology
  • Horticulture

Andrea Nardini focuses on Botany, Xylem, Hydraulic conductivity, Horticulture and Hydraulic conductance. Her research in the fields of Shoot and Stomatal conductance overlaps with other disciplines such as Laurus nobilis, Cavitation and Conductance. Her Xylem research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Biophysics, Phloem and Transpiration.

Her research integrates issues of Agronomy, Endodermis, Exodermis, Woody plant and Olea oleaster in her study of Hydraulic conductivity. Her biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Evergreen and Water content. She combines subjects such as Sunflower, Stomatal aperture and Membrane with her study of Hydraulic conductance.

Her most cited work include:

  • Global convergence in the vulnerability of forests to drought (1256 citations)
  • Refilling of embolized vessels in young stems of laurel. Do We need a new paradigm (286 citations)
  • Limitation of stomatal conductance by hydraulic traits: sensing or preventing xylem cavitation? (280 citations)

What are the main themes of her work throughout her whole career to date?

Her main research concerns Botany, Xylem, Horticulture, Hydraulic conductivity and Water transport. She works mostly in the field of Botany, limiting it down to topics relating to Dehydration and, in certain cases, Sunflower and Helianthus annuus, as a part of the same area of interest. Her Xylem research integrates issues from Ecology, Agronomy and Transpiration.

Her Agronomy study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Arid, Soil water and Fraxinus ornus. Her work on Prunus laurocerasus as part of general Horticulture study is frequently linked to Hydraulics, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of science. Her Hydraulic conductivity research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Membrane and Woody plant.

She most often published in these fields:

  • Botany (51.76%)
  • Xylem (48.82%)
  • Horticulture (31.76%)

What were the highlights of her more recent work (between 2018-2021)?

  • Xylem (48.82%)
  • Water transport (20.00%)
  • Ecology (18.24%)

In recent papers she was focusing on the following fields of study:

Andrea Nardini mainly focuses on Xylem, Water transport, Ecology, Horticulture and Embolism. To a larger extent, Andrea Nardini studies Botany with the aim of understanding Xylem. Her study in the field of Gymnosperm and Plant strategies is also linked to topics like Frost and Close relationship.

Her research investigates the link between Ecology and topics such as Drought tolerance that cross with problems in Biological system and Turgor pressure. The various areas that Andrea Nardini examines in her Horticulture study include Photosynthesis, Stomatal conductance and Bark. Her study in Hydraulic conductivity is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Climate change, Pith, Tracheid and Osmosis.

Between 2018 and 2021, her most popular works were:

  • Insights from in vivo micro‐CT analysis: testing the hydraulic vulnerability segmentation in Acer pseudoplatanus and Fagus sylvatica seedlings (26 citations)
  • The Possible Role of Non-Structural Carbohydrates in the Regulation of Tree Hydraulics. (20 citations)
  • Close to the edge: effects of repeated severe drought on stem hydraulics and non-structural carbohydrates in European beech saplings. (19 citations)

In her most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Botany
  • Ecology
  • Horticulture

Her scientific interests lie mostly in Xylem, Water transport, Horticulture, Hydraulics and Ecology. Her studies deal with areas such as Phloem, Bark and Parenchyma as well as Xylem. Andrea Nardini has included themes like Hydraulic conductivity, Pith and Osmosis in her Parenchyma study.

Her work carried out in the field of Horticulture brings together such families of science as Photosynthesis, Water-use efficiency and Acclimatization. The study incorporates disciplines such as Ailanthus altissima and Phenotypic plasticity in addition to Agronomy. The Resistance study combines topics in areas such as Fraxinus ornus and Transpiration.

Best Publications

  • Global convergence in the vulnerability of forests to drought

    Brendan Choat;Steven Jansen;Tim J. Brodribb;Hervé Cochard;Hervé Cochard

  • Weak tradeoff between xylem safety and xylem-specific hydraulic efficiency across the world's woody plant species

    Sean M. Gleason;Sean M. Gleason;Mark Westoby;Steven Jansen;Brendan Choat

  • Mechanisms of woody-plant mortality under rising drought, CO2 and vapour pressure deficit

    Unknown

  • Refilling of embolized vessels in young stems of laurel. Do We need a new paradigm

    Melvin Thomas Tyree;Sebastiano Salleo;Andrea Nardini;Maria Assunta Lo Gullo

  • Refilling embolized xylem conduits: is it a matter of phloem unloading?

    Andrea Nardini;Maria A. Lo Gullo;Sebastiano Salleo

  • Stomatal closure is induced by hydraulic signals and maintained by ABA in drought-stressed grapevine

    Sergio Tombesi;Andrea Nardini;Tommaso Frioni;Marta Soccolini

  • Limitation of stomatal conductance by hydraulic traits: sensing or preventing xylem cavitation?

    Andrea Nardini;Sebastiano Salleo

  • Xylem cavitation and hydraulic control of stomatal conductance in Laurel (Laurus nobilis L.)

    Sebastiano Salleo;Andrea Nardini;Franco Pitt;Maria A. Lo Gullo

  • New evidence for a role of vessel‐associated cells and phloem in the rapid xylem refilling of cavitated stems of Laurus nobilis L.

    S. Salleo;M. A. Lo Gullo;P. Trifilò;A. Nardini

  • Xylem cavitation in the leaf of Prunus laurocerasus and its impact on leaf hydraulics

    Andrea Nardini;Melvin T. Tyree;Sebastiano Salleo

  • Shoot desiccation and hydraulic failure in temperate woody angiosperms during an extreme summer drought.

    Andrea Nardini;Marta Battistuzzo;Tadeja Savi

  • Trade-offs between leaf hydraulic capacity and drought vulnerability: morpho-anatomical bases, carbon costs and ecological consequences

    Andrea Nardini;Giulia Pedà;Nicoletta La Rocca

  • Hydraulic architecture of leaf blades: where is the main resistance?

    Hervé Cochard;A. Nardini;L. Coll

  • Starch-to-sugar conversion in wood parenchyma of field-growing Laurus nobilis plants: a component of the signal pathway for embolism repair?

    Sebastiano Salleo;Patrizia Trifilò;Sara Esposito;Andrea Nardini

  • Leaf hydraulic capacity and drought vulnerability: possible trade‐offs and correlations with climate across three major biomes

    Andrea Nardini;Jessica Luglio

  • Rooting depth, water relations and non-structural carbohydrate dynamics in three woody angiosperms differentially affected by an extreme summer drought.

    Andrea Nardini;Valentino Casolo;Anna Dal Borgo;Tadeja Savi

  • Xylem embolism refilling and resilience against drought-induced mortality in woody plants: processes and trade-offs

    Tamir Klein;Melanie J. B. Zeppel;William R. L. Anderegg;Jasper Bloemen

  • Drought‐induced xylem cavitation and hydraulic deterioration: risk factors for urban trees under climate change?

    Tadeja Savi;Stefano Bertuzzi;Salvatore Branca;Mauro Tretiach

  • More than just a vulnerable pipeline: xylem physiology in the light of ion-mediated regulation of plant water transport

    Andrea Nardini;Sebastiano Salleo;Steven Jansen

  • Changes in root hydraulic conductance (KR) of Olea oleaster seedlings following drought stress and irrigation

    Maria A. Lo Gullo;Andrea Nardini;Sebastiano Salleo;Melvin T. Tyree

  • The challenge of the Mediterranean climate to plant hydraulics: Responses and adaptations

    Andrea Nardini;Maria A. Lo Gullo;Patrizia Trifilò;Sebastiano Salleo

  • Competitive strategies for water availability in two Mediterranean Quercus species

    A. Nardini;M. A. Lo Gullo;S. Salleo

Frequent Co-Authors

Sebastiano Salleo
Sebastiano Salleo University of Trieste
Patrizia Trifilò
Patrizia Trifilò University of Messina
Stefan Mayr
Stefan Mayr University of Innsbruck
Hervé Cochard
Hervé Cochard INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Steven Jansen
Steven Jansen University of Ulm
M. A. Lo Gullo
M. A. Lo Gullo University of Messina
Sean M. Gleason
Sean M. Gleason Agricultural Research Service
Timothy J. Brodribb
Timothy J. Brodribb University of Tasmania
Frederic Lens
Frederic Lens Naturalis Biodiversity Center
Melvin T. Tyree
Melvin T. Tyree Zhejiang Normal University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Andrea Nardini

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles