World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
39
Citations
4423
World Ranking
8409
National Ranking
3587

Matt Stead publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matt Stead sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 83 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Matt Stead D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matt Stead sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Matt Stead is affiliated with Mayo Clinic in the United States and conducts research primarily in the fields of Neuroscience and Medicine. Their work spans several subfields, including Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Biomedical Engineering.

The main topics that characterize Matt Stead's research include:

  • Neurological disorders and treatments
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies

Their recent publications demonstrate a focus on epilepsy, brain stimulation, and neural dynamics. Selected papers include:

  • "Centromedian thalamic nucleus with or without anterior thalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation for epilepsy in children and adults: A retrospective case series," 2020, Seizure
  • "Epilepsy Personal Assistant Device-A Mobile Platform for Brain State, Dense Behavioral and Physiology Tracking and Controlling Adaptive Stimulation," 2021, Frontiers in Neurology
  • "Pre-motor versus motor cerebral cortex neuromodulation for chronic neuropathic pain," 2021, Scientific Reports
  • "Letter to the Editor: Announcement of a Call for Proposals for biomedical waveform coding," 2024, Clinical Neurophysiology
  • "Phase-Amplitude Coupling Localizes Pathologic Brain with Aid of Behavioral Staging in Sleep," 2023, Life

Matt Stead frequently collaborates with a core group of researchers. Notable coauthors include Gregory A. Worrell, Benjamin H. Brinkmann, Brian N. Lundstrom, Václav Křemen, and Nicholas M. Gregg.

Their research is published in a variety of specialist neuroscience and neurology journals, including Seizure, Frontiers in Neurology, Scientific Reports, Clinical Neurophysiology, and Life. This range reflects a multidisciplinary approach across clinical and experimental neurosciences.

Best Publications

  • Microseizures and the spatiotemporal scales of human partial epilepsy

    Matt Stead;Mark Bower;Benjamin H. Brinkmann;Kendall Lee

  • Synchrony in normal and focal epileptic brain: the seizure onset zone is functionally disconnected.

    Christopher P. Warren;Sanqing Hu;Sanqing Hu;Matt Stead;Benjamin H. Brinkmann

  • Long-term Outcomes After Nonlesional Extratemporal Lobe Epilepsy Surgery

    Katherine Noe;Vlastimil Sulc;Lily Wong-Kisiel;Elaine Wirrell

  • Unsupervised Classification of High-Frequency Oscillations in Human Neocortical Epilepsy and Control Patients

    Justin A. Blanco;Matt Stead;Abba Krieger;Jonathan Viventi

  • Data mining neocortical high-frequency oscillations in epilepsy and controls

    Justin A. Blanco;Matt Stead;Abba Krieger;William Stacey

  • Detection of interictal epileptiform discharges using signal envelope distribution modelling: application to epileptic and non-epileptic intracranial recordings.

    Radek Janca;Petr Jezdik;Roman Cmejla;Martin Tomasek

  • Electrophysiological Biomarkers of Epilepsy

    Richard J. Staba;Matt Stead;Gregory A. Worrell

  • Large-scale electrophysiology: acquisition, compression, encryption, and storage of big data.

    Benjamin H. Brinkmann;Mark R. Bower;Keith A. Stengel;Gregory A. Worrell

  • Integrating Brain Implants With Local and Distributed Computing Devices: A Next Generation Epilepsy Management System

    Vaclav Kremen;Benjamin H. Brinkmann;Inyong Kim;Hari Guragain

  • Differences in functional connectivity profiles as a predictor of response to anterior thalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation for epilepsy: a hypothesis for the mechanism of action and a potential biomarker for outcomes

    Erik H Middlebrooks;Sanjeet S Grewal;Matthew Stead;Brian N Lundstrom

  • Spatiotemporal Neuronal Correlates of Seizure Generation in Focal Epilepsy

    Mark R. Bower;Matt Stead;Fredric B. Meyer;W. Richard Marsh

  • On the Recording Reference Contribution to EEG Correlation, Phase Synchorony, and Coherence

    Sanqing Hu;Matt Stead;Qionghai Dai;Gregory A Worrell

  • Physiological and pathological high frequency oscillations in focal epilepsy.

    Jan Cimbalnik;Benjamin Brinkmann;Vaclav Kremen;Vaclav Kremen;Pavel Jurak

  • Network oscillations modulate interictal epileptiform spike rate during human memory

    Joseph Y. Matsumoto;Matt Stead;Michal T. Kucewicz;Andrew J. Matsumoto

  • Evidence for verbal memory enhancement with electrical brain stimulation in the lateral temporal cortex.

    Michał Tomasz Kucewicz;Brent M. Berry;Laura R. Miller;Fatemeh Khadjevand

  • Chronic Subthreshold Cortical Stimulation to Treat Focal Epilepsy.

    Brian Nils Lundstrom;Jamie Van Gompel;Jeffrey Britton;Katherine Nickels

  • Increased cortical extracellular adenosine correlates with seizure termination

    Jamie J. Van Gompel;Mark R. Bower;Gregory A. Worrell;Matt Stead

  • Forecasting Seizures Using Intracranial EEG Measures and SVM in Naturally Occurring Canine Epilepsy

    Benjamin H. Brinkmann;Edward E. Patterson;Charles Vite;Vincent M. Vasoli

  • Automatic Identification and Removal of Scalp Reference Signal for Intracranial EEGs Based on Independent Component Analysis

    Sanqing Hu;M. Stead;G.A. Worrell

  • Deep brain stimulation in tourette syndrome: a description of 3 patients with excellent outcome.

    Rodolfo Savica;Matt Stead;Kenneth J. Mack;Kendall H. Lee

Frequent Co-Authors

Kendall H. Lee
Kendall H. Lee Mayo Clinic
W. Richard Marsh
W. Richard Marsh Mayo Clinic
Brian Litt
Brian Litt University of Pennsylvania
Fredric B. Meyer
Fredric B. Meyer Mayo Clinic
Milan Brázdil
Milan Brázdil Central European Institute of Technology
Keith A. Josephs
Keith A. Josephs Mayo Clinic

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience opens doors to diverse career options, especially when combined with related fields through online programs. Many students now opt for accelerated bachelors degrees, which allow you to graduate faster and enter the workforce sooner. This can be a strategic choice for those eager to gain hands-on experience or pursue advanced study.

If salary potential is one of your key considerations, it’s important to research the highest paying bachelor degrees available. Neuroscience, as a STEM discipline, often aligns with lucrative roles, especially when paired with additional qualifications.

Some students look for the most efficient path to a well-paying job. For inspiration, consider options highlighted among easiest college majors with high pay. Blending neuroscience coursework with other in-demand majors may boost your career prospects.

Cost is a critical factor for many students. Thankfully, there are several accredited online colleges that accept fafsa, making quality education more affordable and accessible. Combining online flexibility with financial aid options can help you build a successful career in neuroscience without overwhelming debt.

Best Scientists Citing Matt Stead

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles