World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
34
Citations
4628
World Ranking
10243
National Ranking
5385

Aimee N. C. Campbell publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aimee N. C. Campbell sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 169 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Aimee N. C. Campbell D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aimee N. C. Campbell sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Aimee N. C. Campbell is affiliated with Columbia University Medical Center in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medical fields, with a strong concentration in epidemiology, public health, and clinical psychology. Their work spans various subfields including public health, environmental and occupational health, general health professions, and pediatrics, perinatology and child health.

Their main topics of study include:

  • Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
  • Health Policy Implementation Science
  • HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Community Health and Development

Aimee N. C. Campbell has contributed extensively to scientific literature, with a notable presence in key journals such as:

  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence
  • Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
  • American Journal on Addictions
  • Journal of Addiction Medicine
  • Journal of Substance Use and Addiction Treatment

Recent publications by Campbell include:

  • The HEALing (Helping to End Addiction Long-term SM) Communities Study: Protocol for a cluster randomized trial at the community level to reduce opioid overdose deaths through implementation of an integrated set of evidence-based practices, 2020, Drug and Alcohol Dependence
  • Using digital technologies in clinical trials: Current and future applications, 2020, Contemporary Clinical Trials
  • The application of digital health to the assessment and treatment of substance use disorders: The past, current, and future role of the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network, 2020, Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
  • Opioid Use Disorder in Women and the Implications for Treatment, 2020, Psychiatric Research and Clinical Practice
  • Model and approach for assessing implementation context and fidelity in the HEALing Communities Study, 2020, Drug and Alcohol Dependence

The scientist collaborates frequently with several coauthors including:

  • Edward V. Nunes
  • Martina Pavlicová
  • John Rotrosen
  • Jennifer Scodes
  • Elwin Wu

Best Publications

  • Do treatment improvements in PTSD severity affect substance use outcomes? A secondary analysis from a randomized clinical trial in NIDA's Clinical Trials Network.

    Denise A. Hien;Huiping Jiang;Aimee N.C. Campbell;Mei-Chen Hu

  • Multisite randomized trial of behavioral interventions for women with co-occurring PTSD and substance use disorders.

    Denise A. Hien;Elizabeth A. Wells;Huiping Jiang;Lourdes Suarez-Morales

  • Internet-delivered treatment for substance abuse: A multisite randomized controlled trial

    Aimee N.C. Campbell;Edward V. Nunes;Abigail G. Matthews;Maxine Stitzer

  • Is traumatic stress a vulnerability factor for women with substance use disorders

    Denise Hien;Lisa Cohen;Aimee Campbell

  • Developing an opioid use disorder treatment cascade: A review of quality measures.

    Arthur Robin Williams;Edward V. Nunes;Adam Bisaga;Harold A. Pincus

  • Using e-technologies in clinical trials.

    Carmen Rosa;Aimee N.C. Campbell;Aimee N.C. Campbell;Gloria M. Miele;Meg Brunner

  • Effectiveness of HIV/STD sexual risk reduction groups for women in substance abuse treatment programs: results of NIDA Clinical Trials Network Trial.

    Susan Tross;Aimee N C Campbell;Lisa R Cohen;Donald Calsyn

  • The role of alcohol misuse in PTSD outcomes for women in community treatment: A secondary analysis of NIDA's Women and Trauma Study

    Denise A. Hien;Aimee N.C. Campbell;Lesia M. Ruglass;Mei-Chen Hu

  • Future directions for medication assisted treatment for opioid use disorder with American Indian/Alaska Natives

    Kamilla L. Venner;Dennis M. Donovan;Aimee N.C. Campbell;Dennis C. Wendt

  • Intimate partner violence outcomes in women with PTSD and substance use: A secondary analysis of NIDA Clinical Trials Network “Women and Trauma” Multi-site Study

    Lisa R. Cohen;Craig A Field;Aimee N.C. Campbell;Aimee N.C. Campbell;Denise A. Hien;Denise A. Hien

  • The impact of trauma-focused group therapy upon HIV sexual risk behaviors in the NIDA Clinical Trials Network "Women and trauma" multi-site study.

    Denise A. Hien;Denise A. Hien;Aimee N C Campbell;Therese Killeen;Mei Chen Hu

  • Using digital technologies in clinical trials: Current and future applications.

    Carmen Rosa;Lisa A. Marsch;Erin L. Winstanley;Meg Brunner

  • Helping alliance, retention, and treatment outcomes: A secondary analysis from the NIDA clinical trials network women and trauma study.

    Lesia M. Ruglass;Gloria M. Miele;Denise A. Hien;Denise A. Hien;Aimee N. C. Campbell

  • No evidence of compensatory drug use risk behavior among heroin users after receiving take-home naloxone

    Jermaine D. Jones;Aimee Campbell;Verena E. Metz;Sandra D. Comer

  • Misuse of atypical antipsychotics in conjunction with alcohol and other drugs of abuse.

    Tara Malekshahi;Nina Tioleco;Nahima Ahmed;Aimee N.C. Campbell;Aimee N.C. Campbell

  • Relationship power and sexual risk among women in community-based substance abuse treatment.

    Aimee N.C. Campbell;Susan Tross;Susan Tross;Shari L. Dworkin;Mei Chen Hu

  • Adverse events in an integrated trauma-focused intervention for women in community substance abuse treatment.

    Therese Killeen;Denise A. Hien;Aimee N.C. Campbell;Chanda Brown

  • Opioid Use Disorder in Women and the Implications for Treatment

    Celestina Barbosa‐Leiker;Aimee N. C. Campbell;R. Kathryn McHugh;Constance Guille

  • Design and Methodological Considerations of an Effectiveness Trial of a Computer-assisted Intervention: An Example from the NIDA Clinical Trials Network

    Aimee N.C. Campbell;Edward V. Nunes;Gloria M. Miele;Abigail Matthews

  • The application of digital health to the assessment and treatment of substance use disorders: The past, current, and future role of the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network.

    Lisa A. Marsch;Aimee Campbell;Cynthia Campbell;Ching Hua Chen

  • Attendance and Substance Use Outcomes for the Seeking Safety Program: Sometimes Less Is More.

    Denise A. Hien;Antonio A. Morgan-Lopez;Aimee N. C. Campbell;Lissette M. Saavedra

  • Substance Use and High Risk Sexual Behaviors among Women in Psychosocial Outpatient and Methadone Maintenance Treatment Programs

    Susan Tross;Jennifer Hanner;Mei-Chen Hu;Martina Pavlicova

Frequent Co-Authors

Edward V. Nunes
Edward V. Nunes Columbia University
Denise A. Hien
Denise A. Hien Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Susan Tross
Susan Tross Columbia University
Joanne Neale
Joanne Neale King's College London
Don C. Des Jarlais
Don C. Des Jarlais New York University
Sandra D. Comer
Sandra D. Comer Columbia University
Shelly F. Greenfield
Shelly F. Greenfield Harvard University
Antonio A. Morgan-Lopez
Antonio A. Morgan-Lopez RTI International
Elwin Wu
Elwin Wu Columbia University
Hannah L.F. Cooper
Hannah L.F. Cooper Emory University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing to study Psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of fulfilling career pathways, especially in counseling and therapy. Many students are interested in how to become a marriage and family therapist in Richmond, as this role is in high demand across the country. Marriage and family therapists (MFTs) help clients navigate relationship challenges and mental health concerns through evidence-based approaches.

Online psychology degrees can be a great starting point for those wondering how to become an MFT in Riverside or other cities. These programs often offer the flexibility needed for working professionals and students balancing other commitments. It's important to understand that requirements vary by state and region, so researching Sacramento mft education requirements or those in other localities can clarify next steps.

Beyond core coursework, prospective therapists should look at local regulations like those found for how to become a marriage and family therapist in Saint Paul. Whether you pursue online or in-person degrees, aligning your education with career requirements is essential for future success.

Best Scientists Citing Aimee N. C. Campbell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles