World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
65
Citations
12654
World Ranking
3169
National Ranking
1472

Sandra D. Comer publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sandra D. Comer sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 208 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Sandra D. Comer D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sandra D. Comer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2016 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Sandra D. Comer is affiliated with Columbia University in the United States and has an extensive publication record primarily in the field of Medicine, with a strong focus on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Epidemiology, Pharmacology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, and Toxicology.

Their research centers on topics related to opioid use and substance abuse, prominently featuring areas such as Opioid Use Disorder Treatment, Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes, Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis, Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior, Pain Management and Opioid Use, Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects, and Poisoning and Overdose Treatments.

Frequent co-authors include Jermaine D. Jones, Suky Martinez, Rachel Luba, Laura Brandt, and Felipe Castillo, reflecting ongoing collaborative efforts within the addiction and pharmacology research communities.

Publication venues where Sandra D. Comer has consistently contributed include:

  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence
  • Neuropsychopharmacology
  • Addiction
  • Annals of Emergency Medicine
  • The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse

Selected recent papers illustrate the scope of their research focus:

  • Pharmacotherapeutic strategies for treating cocaine use disorder-what do we have to offer?, 2020, Addiction
  • Therapeutic and Prophylactic Vaccines to Counteract Fentanyl Use Disorders and Toxicity, 2020, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
  • Neurocognitive impairments and brain abnormalities resulting from opioid-related overdoses: A systematic review, 2021, Drug and Alcohol Dependence
  • The Increasing Prevalence of Fentanyl: A Urinalysis-Based Study Among Individuals With Opioid Use Disorder in New York City, 2020, American Journal on Addictions
  • Effects of lorcaserin on oxycodone self-administration and subjective responses in participants with opioid use disorder, 2020, Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Sandra D. Comer was recognized as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2016, indicating peer acknowledgment within the professional community.

Best Publications

  • Injectable, Sustained-Release Naltrexone for the Treatment of Opioid Dependence: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial

    Sandra D. Comer;Maria A. Sullivan;Elmer Yu;Jami L. Rothenberg

  • Abstinence symptoms following smoked marijuana in humans.

    M. Haney;Amie S. Ward;Sandra D. Comer;Richard W. Foltin

  • Abstinence symptoms following oral THC administration to humans.

    Margaret Haney;Amie S. Ward;Sandra D. Comer;Richard W. Foltin

  • Risks, Management, and Monitoring of Combination Opioid, Benzodiazepines, and/or Alcohol Use

    Jeffrey A. Gudin;Shanthi Mogali;Jermaine D. Jones;Sandra D. Comer

  • Dronabinol and marijuana in HIV-positive marijuana smokers. Caloric intake, mood, and sleep.

    Margaret Haney;Erik W Gunderson;Judith Rabkin;Carl L Hart

  • Depot naltrexone: long-lasting antagonism of the effects of heroin in humans

    Sandra D. Comer;Eric D. Collins;Herbert D. Kleber;Elie S. Nuwayser

  • Fentanyl: Receptor pharmacology, abuse potential, and implications for treatment

    Sandra D. Comer;Catherine M. Cahill

  • Classification and definition of misuse, abuse, and related events in clinical trials: ACTTION systematic review and recommendations

    Shannon M. Smith;Richard C. Dart;Nathaniel P. Katz;Florence Paillard

  • Challenges in the development of prescription opioid abuse-deterrent formulations.

    Nathaniel P. Katz;Edgar H. Adams;Howard Chilcoat;Robert D. Colucci

  • Effects of THC and lofexidine in a human laboratory model of marijuana withdrawal and relapse

    Margaret Haney;Carl L. Hart;Suzanne K. Vosburg;Sandra D. Comer

  • Comparison of smoked marijuana and oral Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol in humans

    Carl L. Hart;Amie S. Ward;Margaret Haney;Sandra D. Comer

  • Deficits in dopamine D(2) receptors and presynaptic dopamine in heroin dependence: commonalities and differences with other types of addiction.

    Diana Martinez;Phillip A. Saccone;Fei Liu;Mark Slifstein

  • Bupropion SR worsens mood during marijuana withdrawal in humans.

    Margaret Haney;Amie S. Ward;Sandra D. Comer;Carl L. Hart

  • The NMDA antagonist memantine attenuates the expression of opioid physical dependence in humans.

    Adam Bisaga;Sandra D. Comer;Amie S. Ward;Piotr Popik

  • Buprenorphine maintenance and mu-opioid receptor availability in the treatment of opioid use disorder: Implications for clinical use and policy

    Mark K. Greenwald;Sandra D. Comer;David A. Fiellin

  • Abuse liability of prescription opioids compared to heroin in morphine-maintained heroin abusers.

    Sandra D Comer;Maria A Sullivan;Robert A Whittington;Suzanne K Vosburg

  • Sex differences and hormonal influences on response to cold pressor pain in humans.

    William J. Kowalczyk;Suzette M. Evans;Adam M. Bisaga;Maria A. Sullivan

  • The role of human drug self-administration procedures in the development of medications

    S.D. Comer;J.B. Ashworth;R.W. Foltin;C.E. Johanson

  • Abuse liability of intravenous buprenorphine/naloxone and buprenorphine alone in buprenorphine‐maintained intravenous heroin abusers

    Sandra D. Comer;Maria A. Sullivan;Suzanne K. Vosburg;Jeanne Manubay

  • Impact of co-administration of oxycodone and smoked cannabis on analgesia and abuse liability

    Ziva D. Cooper;Gillinder Bedi;Divya Ramesh;Rebecca Balter

  • Acute Physiological and Behavioral Effects of Intranasal Methamphetamine in Humans

    Carl L Hart;Erik W Gunderson;Audrey Perez;Matthew G Kirkpatrick

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard W. Foltin
Richard W. Foltin Columbia University
Margaret Haney
Margaret Haney Columbia University
Carl L. Hart
Carl L. Hart Columbia University
Adam Bisaga
Adam Bisaga Columbia University
Joanne Neale
Joanne Neale King's College London
Aimee N. C. Campbell
Aimee N. C. Campbell Columbia University Medical Center
Herbert D. Kleber
Herbert D. Kleber Columbia University
Edward V. Nunes
Edward V. Nunes Columbia University
John Strang
John Strang King's College London
Diana Martinez
Diana Martinez Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students interested in neuroscience have multiple degree and career options beyond traditional routes. Many now look to psyd online programs for specialized training in clinical psychology, connecting neuroscience foundations with practice.

Those wanting to fast-track their education might explore accelerated marriage and family therapy programs, which can open doors to licensed counseling roles that integrate brain science concepts. Similarly, accelerated online bachelor's degree paths offer a swift, flexible route to begin a neuroscience-centered career or prepare for graduate studies.

Salary potential is also important to consider. For learners seeking strong earning prospects right out of college, it's useful to review the highest paid degrees to see which fields—often in healthcare, technology, or research—overlap with neuroscience skill sets.

Online degrees make it easier to connect neuroscience knowledge with a wide variety of rewarding careers, all with the flexibility to learn from anywhere.

Best Scientists Citing Sandra D. Comer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles