World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
50
Citations
11085
World Ranking
5685
National Ranking
2512

Diana Martinez publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diana Martinez sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 125 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Diana Martinez D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diana Martinez sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Diana Martinez is affiliated with Columbia University in the United States. Their research spans primarily the fields of Neuroscience and Medicine, with a significant focus on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems. Additional subfields include Physiology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

The scientist's work covers key topics such as the neuroscience of respiration and sleep, neurotransmitter receptor influence on behavior, and sleep and wakefulness research. Other important areas of investigation include obstructive sleep apnea research, substance abuse treatment and outcomes, functional brain connectivity studies, and neural dynamics and brain function.

Frequent publication venues where Martinez's work appears include Neuropsychopharmacology, Cancer, Hypertension Research, the American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, and Frontiers in Neuroscience.

Martinez has co-authored extensively with several researchers, notably David D. Kline, Eileen M. Hasser, Marisa C. Weiss, Julianne Hibbs, and Sam Meske.

Representative papers from their recent work include:

  • Addiction as a brain disease revised: why it still matters, and the need for consilience (2021), Neuropsychopharmacology
  • Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for smoking cessation: a pivotal multicenter double-blind randomized controlled trial (2021), World Psychiatry
  • A Coala-T-Cannabis Survey Study of breast cancer patients' use of cannabis before, during, and after treatment (2021), Cancer
  • Chemical Targeting of Voltage Sensitive Dyes to Specific Cells and Molecules in the Brain (2020), Journal of the American Chemical Society
  • The relationship between SGLT2 and systemic blood pressure regulation (2024), Hypertension Research

Best Publications

  • Prefrontal dopamine D1 receptors and working memory in schizophrenia.

    Anissa Abi-Dargham;Osama Mawlawi;Ilise Lombardo;Roberto Gil

  • Imaging Human Mesolimbic Dopamine Transmission with Positron Emission Tomography: I. Accuracy and Precision of D2 Receptor Parameter Measurements in Ventral Striatum:

    Osama Mawlawi;Diana Martinez;Mark Slifstein;Allegra Broft

  • Imaging human mesolimbic dopamine transmission with positron emission tomography. Part II: amphetamine-induced dopamine release in the functional subdivisions of the striatum.

    Diana Martinez;Mark Slifstein;Allegra Broft;Osama Mawlawi

  • Alcohol Dependence Is Associated with Blunted Dopamine Transmission in the Ventral Striatum

    Diana Martinez;Roberto Gil;Mark Slifstein;Dah Ren Hwang

  • Amphetamine-Induced Dopamine Release: Markedly Blunted in Cocaine Dependence and Predictive of the Choice to Self-Administer Cocaine

    Diana Martinez;Rajesh Narendran;Richard W. Foltin;Mark Slifstein

  • Increased anterior cingulate and caudate activity in bipolar mania.

    Hilary P Blumberg;Emily Stern;Diana Martinez;Sally Ricketts

  • Cocaine dependence and d2 receptor availability in the functional subdivisions of the striatum: relationship with cocaine-seeking behavior.

    Diana Martinez;Allegra Broft;Richard W Foltin;Mark Slifstein

  • Rostral and orbital prefrontal cortex dysfunction in the manic state of bipolar disorder.

    Hilary P. Blumberg;Emily Stern;Sally Ricketts;Diana Martinez

  • Imaging Dopamine Transmission in Cocaine Dependence: Link Between Neurochemistry and Response to Treatment

    Diana Martinez;Kenneth M. Carpenter;Fei Liu;Mark Slifstein

  • The variable number of tandem repeats polymorphism of the dopamine transporter gene is not associated with significant change in dopamine transporter phenotype in humans.

    Diana Martinez;Joel Gelernter;Anissa Abi-Dargham;Christopher H van Dyck

  • Sex Differences in Striatal Dopamine Release in Young Adults After Oral Alcohol Challenge: A Positron Emission Tomography Imaging Study With [11C]Raclopride

    Nina B.L. Urban;Lawrence S. Kegeles;Mark Slifstein;Xiaoyan Xu

  • Addiction as a brain disease revised: why it still matters, and the need for consilience.

    Markus Heilig;James MacKillop;James MacKillop;Diana Martinez;Jürgen Rehm

  • In vivo vulnerability to competition by endogenous dopamine: comparison of the D2 receptor agonist radiotracer (-)-N-[11C]propyl-norapomorphine ([11C]NPA) with the D2 receptor antagonist radiotracer [11C]-raclopride.

    Rajesh Narendran;Dah Ren Hwang;Mark Slifstein;Peter S. Talbot

  • Increasing dopamine D2 receptor expression in the adult nucleus accumbens enhances motivation.

    Pierre Trifilieff;Bo Feng;Eneko Urizar;Vanessa Winiger

  • Lower level of endogenous dopamine in patients with cocaine dependence: findings from PET imaging of D(2)/D(3) receptors following acute dopamine depletion.

    Diana Martinez;B.A. Kaitlin Greene;Allegra Broft;Dileep Kumar

  • Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for smoking cessation: a pivotal multicenter double-blind randomized controlled trial

    Abraham Zangen;Hagar Moshe;Diana Martinez;Noam Barnea-Ygael

  • Measurement of striatal and extrastriatal dopamine D1 receptor binding potential with [11C]NNC 112 in humans: validation and reproducibility.

    Anissa Abi-Dargham;Diana Martinez;Osama Mawlawi;Norman Simpson

  • Imaging addiction: D2 receptors and dopamine signaling in the striatum as biomarkers for impulsivity

    Pierre Trifilieff;Diana Martinez

  • Altered prefrontal dopaminergic function in chronic recreational ketamine users.

    Rajesh Narendran;W. Gordon Frankle;Richard Keefe;Roberto Gil

  • Dopamine type 2/3 receptor availability in the striatum and social status in human volunteers.

    Diana Martinez;Daria Orlowska;Rajesh Narendran;Mark Slifstein

  • Striatal amphetamine-induced dopamine release in patients with schizotypal personality disorder studied with single photon emission computed tomography and [123I]iodobenzamide

    Anissa Abi-Dargham;Lawrence S Kegeles;Yolanda Zea-Ponce;Osama Mawlawi

Frequent Co-Authors

Anissa Abi-Dargham
Anissa Abi-Dargham Stony Brook University
Marc Laruelle
Marc Laruelle Columbia University
Yiyun Huang
Yiyun Huang Yale University
Lawrence S. Kegeles
Lawrence S. Kegeles Columbia University
Edward V. Nunes
Edward V. Nunes Columbia University
Richard W. Foltin
Richard W. Foltin Columbia University
Herbert D. Kleber
Herbert D. Kleber Columbia University
Rachel Marsh
Rachel Marsh Columbia University
Xuejun Hao
Xuejun Hao Columbia University
Sandra D. Comer
Sandra D. Comer Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Diana Martinez

Trending Scientists