World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
46
Citations
10249
World Ranking
6365
National Ranking
302

Matthias Ziegler publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthias Ziegler sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 207 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

Matthias Ziegler D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthias Ziegler sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Matthias Ziegler is affiliated with Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin in Germany and specializes primarily in the field of Psychology. Their research spans several subfields including Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, and Applied Psychology.

Their body of work covers a number of main topics, including:

  • Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Psychometric Methodologies and Testing

Matthias Ziegler has contributed to several recent papers published in notable journals. These include:

  • "Descriptive, Predictive and Explanatory Personality Research: Different Goals, Different Approaches, but a Shared Need to Move beyond the Big Few Traits" (2020, European Journal of Personality)
  • "Assessing Personality States: What to Consider when Constructing Personality State Measures" (2020, European Journal of Personality)
  • "Confirmatory Factor Analyses in Psychological Test Adaptation and Development" (2023, Psychological Test Adaptation and Development)
  • "Unveiling an exclusive link: Predicting behavior with personality, situation perception, and affect in a preregistered experience sampling study." (2020, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology)
  • "Bottom Up Construction of a Personality Taxonomy" (2020, European Journal of Psychological Assessment)

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Kai T. Horstmann
  • Samuel Greiff
  • Dragoș Iliescu
  • Lena Lämmle
  • Mitja D. Back

Matthias Ziegler often publishes in the following venues:

  • European Journal of Psychological Assessment
  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • European Journal of Personality
  • Psychological Test Adaptation and Development
  • Personality and Individual Differences

Best Publications

  • Is It Really Robust

    Emanuel Schmider;Matthias Ziegler;Erik Danay;Luzi Beyer

  • Statistik für Psychologen und Sozialwissenschaftler

    Markus Bühner;Matthias Ziegler

  • The Situational Eight DIAMONDS: a taxonomy of major dimensions of situation characteristics.

    John F. Rauthmann;David Gallardo-Pujol;Esther M. Guillaume;Elysia Todd

  • Masking misfit in confirmatory factor analysis by increasing unique variances: a cautionary note on the usefulness of cutoff values of fit indices.

    Moritz Heene;Sven Hilbert;Clemens Draxler;Matthias Ziegler

  • Short Scales – Five Misunderstandings and Ways to Overcome Them

    Matthias Ziegler;Christoph J. Kemper;Peter Kruyen

  • Openness, fluid intelligence, and crystallized intelligence: Toward an integrative model

    Matthias Ziegler;Erik Danay;Moritz Heene;Jens Asendorpf

  • New perspectives on faking in personality assessment.

    Matthias Ziegler;Carolyn MacCann;Richard D. Roberts

  • Modeling Socially Desirable Responding and Its Effects.

    Matthias Ziegler;Markus Buehner

  • Descriptive, Predictive and Explanatory Personality Research: Different Goals, Different Approaches, but a Shared Need to Move beyond the Big Few Traits:

    Rene Mottus;Rene Mottus;Dustin Wood;David Condon;Mitja D. Back

  • Psychiatrists' use of shared decision making in the treatment of schizophrenia: patient characteristics and decision topics.

    Johannes Hamann;Rosmarie Mendel;Rudolf Cohen;Stephan Heres

  • Testing the Unidimensionality of Items

    Matthias Ziegler;Dirk Hagemann

  • Cognitive abilities and their interplay: Reasoning, crystallized intelligence, working memory components, and sustained attention.

    Markus Buehner;Stefan Krumm;Matthias Ziegler;Tonja Pluecken

  • Assessing Personality States: What to Consider when Constructing Personality State Measures

    Kai Tobias Horstmann;Matthias Ziegler

  • Working memory, visual–spatial-intelligence and their relationship to problem-solving

    Markus Bühner;Stephan Kröner;Matthias Ziegler

  • Predicting academic success with the Big 5 rated from different points of view: Self‐rated, other rated and faked:

    Matthias Ziegler;Erik Danay;Franziska Schölmerich;Markus Bühner

  • Confirmatory Factor Analyses in Psychological Test Adaptation and Development

    Unknown

  • Fakability of different measurement methods for achievement motivation: Questionnaire, semi-projective, and objective.

    Matthias Ziegler;Lothar Schmidt-Atzert;Markus Bühner;Stefan Krumm

  • Stop and State Your Intentions! Let's Not Forget the ABC of Test Construction

    Matthias Ziegler

  • Short Versus Long Scales in Clinical Assessment: Exploring the Trade-Off Between Resources Saved and Psychometric Quality Lost Using Two Measures of Obsessive-Compulsive Symptoms.

    Christoph J Kemper;Stefanie Trapp;Norbert Kathmann;Douglas B Samuel

  • Openness as a buffer against cognitive decline: The Openness-Fluid-Crystallized-Intelligence (OFCI) model applied to late adulthood.

    Matthias Ziegler;Anja Cengia;Patrick Mussel;Denis Gerstorf

  • Reasoning and Working Memory as Predictors of School Grades.

    Stefan Krumm;Matthias Ziegler;Markus Buehner

  • The Relation of Personality and Intelligence-What Can the Brunswik Symmetry Principle Tell Us?

    André Kretzschmar;Marion Spengler;Anna-Lena Schubert;Ricarda Steinmayr

Frequent Co-Authors

Markus Bühner
Markus Bühner Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
John F. Rauthmann
John F. Rauthmann Bielefeld University
David C. Funder
David C. Funder University of California, Riverside
Mitja D. Back
Mitja D. Back University of Münster
René Mõttus
René Mõttus University of Edinburgh
Delroy L. Paulhus
Delroy L. Paulhus University of British Columbia
Ryne A. Sherman
Ryne A. Sherman Florida Atlantic University
Carolyn MacCann
Carolyn MacCann University of Sydney
Manfred Schmitt
Manfred Schmitt University of Koblenz and Landau

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology can open doors to diverse online career pathways, especially in the field of social work. One major consideration is understanding the educational requirements that vary by state. For instance, if you're interested in working as a social worker in Minnesota, you should review the social worker education requirements in Minnesota, which detail the necessary credentials.

Similarly, requirements differ in other states. You can explore the Mississippi minimum degree requirement for social workers and the Missouri minimum degree requirement for social workers to better understand local expectations. These state-specific guidelines influence which online programs will help you meet your career goals.

Additionally, anyone considering a move to Montana or planning to work virtually should look into the Montana education requirements for social workers. By comparing degree pathways and licensure standards, students can make informed decisions when selecting an online Psychology or social work degree, ensuring they qualify for rewarding positions after graduation.

Best Scientists Citing Matthias Ziegler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles