World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
71
Citations
34647
World Ranking
2112
National Ranking
1228

David C. Funder publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David C. Funder sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 190 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

David C. Funder D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David C. Funder sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1999 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

David C. Funder is affiliated with the University of California, Riverside in the United States. Their research is primarily situated within the field of Psychology, with a focus on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

The scientist's work covers several key topics, including:

  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research

Recent publications demonstrate a range of interests and collaborations. Notable papers include:

  • "Who in the world is trying to change their personality traits? Volitional personality change among college students in six continents." (2021, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology)
  • "MIsgivings about measurement invariance" (2024, European Journal of Personality)
  • "The economic well-being of nations is associated with positive daily situational experiences" (2023, Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology)

The scientist collaborates frequently with a number of colleagues, including:

  • Gwendolyn Gardiner
  • Erica Baranski
  • Daniel Lee
  • Maite Beramendi
  • Brock Bastian

David C. Funder has contributed to publications in venues such as the European Journal of Personality, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, and Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology.

In recognition of their work, the scientist received the distinction of Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1999.

Best Publications

  • Evaluating Effect Size in Psychological Research: Sense and Nonsense:

    David C. Funder;Daniel J. Ozer

  • Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements: Whatever happened to actual behavior?

    Roy F. Baumeister;Kathleen D. Vohs;David C. Funder

  • On the accuracy of personality judgment: a realistic approach.

    David C. Funder

  • Profiting from controversy. Lessons from the person-situation debate.

    Douglas T. Kenrick;David C. Funder

  • Errors and Mistakes: Evaluating the Accuracy of Social Judgment

    David C. Funder

  • Overly positive self-evaluations and personality: negative implications for mental health.

    C. Randall Colvin;Jack Block;David C. Funder

  • The Personality Puzzle

    David Charles Funder

  • Recommendations for increasing replicability in psychology.

    Jens B. Asendorpf;Mark Conner;Filip de Fruyt;Jan De Houwer

  • Predicting more of the people more of the time: Assessing the personality of situations.

    David J. Bem;David C. Funder

  • Friends and strangers: acquaintanceship, agreement, and the accuracy of personality judgment.

    David C. Funder;C. Randall Colvin

  • Towards a resolution of the personality triad: Persons, situations, and behaviors

    David C. Funder

  • The Situational Eight DIAMONDS: a taxonomy of major dimensions of situation characteristics.

    John F. Rauthmann;David Gallardo-Pujol;Esther M. Guillaume;Elysia Todd

  • Differences between traits: properties associated with interjudge agreement.

    David C. Funder;Kathryn M. Dobroth

  • Impulsivity and the Self-Defeating Behavior of Narcissists

    Simine Vazire;David C. Funder

  • Explorations in behavioral consistency: properties of persons, situations, and behaviors.

    David C. Funder;C. Randall Colvin

  • Personality and Life Satisfaction: A Facet-Level Analysis

    Ulrich Schimmack;Shigehiro Oishi;R. Michael Furr;David C. Funder

  • Personality judgment: A realistic approach to person perception.

    David C. Funder

  • Global Traits: A Neo-Allportian Approach to Personality:

    David C. Funder

  • Conspicuous Consumption versus Charitable Behavior in Response to Social Exclusion: A Differential Needs Explanation

    Jaehoon Lee;L. J. Shrum

  • Behavior as a function of the situation.

    David C. Funder;Daniel J. Ozer

  • Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?-Open Peer Commentary-Gone with the wind: Individual differences in heuristics and biases undermine the implication of

    K. E. Stanovich;R. F. West;D. C. Funder

Frequent Co-Authors

Ryne A. Sherman
Ryne A. Sherman Florida Atlantic University
John F. Rauthmann
John F. Rauthmann Bielefeld University
Jack Block
Jack Block University of California, Berkeley
Marco Perugini
Marco Perugini University of Milano-Bicocca
Matthias Ziegler
Matthias Ziegler Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
R. Michael Furr
R. Michael Furr Wake Forest University
Jaap J. A. Denissen
Jaap J. A. Denissen Utrecht University
Jens B. Asendorpf
Jens B. Asendorpf Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Manfred Schmitt
Manfred Schmitt University of Koblenz and Landau
Marcel A. G. van Aken
Marcel A. G. van Aken Utrecht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering an online degree in psychology opens up diverse career pathways, including counseling, research, mental health services, and human resources. Online programs offer flexible learning tailored to busy schedules, making them ideal for working professionals and career changers alike. Many top institutions provide these programs, helping students acquire practical skills and theoretical knowledge.

When choosing a program, location and reputation matter. For instance, students interested in the western United States can explore the best-ranked psychology degree programs in Reno or the dynamic opportunities offered by the best-ranked psychology degree programs in Seattle. In the South, prospective students can review the popular psychology programs in University, MS for a different regional perspective.

Nationwide, accredited distance programs can be found in the popular psychology degrees in USA rankings, helping students identify high-quality options regardless of their location. With a wide array of online degrees and career directions, psychology offers lasting professional growth and meaningful impact.

Best Scientists Citing David C. Funder

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles