World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
66
Citations
28359
World Ranking
2645
National Ranking
1521

Jack Block publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jack Block sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 145 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jack Block D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jack Block sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1999 - Bruno Klopfer Award, Society for Personality Assessment
  • 1970 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Jack Block was affiliated with the University of California, Berkeley in the United States. Throughout their career, they contributed to the academic community primarily through their involvement at this institution.

Block's recognitions included the Bruno Klopfer Award from the Society for Personality Assessment in 1999 and being named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1970.

Information on specific papers, co-authors, publication venues, fields of study, subfields, and topics related to their academic work is not available from the provided data.

Best Publications

  • IQ and ego-resiliency: conceptual and empirical connections and separateness.

    Jack Block;Adam M. Kremen

  • A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description.

    Jack Block

  • The Role of Ego-Control and Ego-Resiliency in the Organization of Behavior

    Jeanne H. Block;Jack Block

  • Adolescent drug use and psychological health: A longitudinal inquiry.

    Jonathan Shedler;Jack Block

  • The Q-sort method in personality assessment and psychiatric research

    Jack Block

  • Lives Through Time

    Jack Block

  • Overly positive self-evaluations and personality: negative implications for mental health.

    C. Randall Colvin;Jack Block;David C. Funder

  • A longitudinal study of consistency and change in self-esteem from early adolescence to early adulthood.

    Jack Block;Richard W. Robins

  • The personality of children prior to divorce: a prospective study.

    Jeanne H. Block;Jack Block;Per F. Gjerde

  • Longitudinally foretelling drug usage in adolescence: early childhood personality and environmental precursors.

    Jack Block;Jeanne H. Block;Susan Keyes

  • Do positive illusions foster mental health ? An examination of the Taylor and Brown formulation

    C. Randall Colvin;Jack Block

  • Ego-control and ego-resiliency: Generalization of self-report scales based on personality descriptions from acquaintances, clinicians, and the self

    Tera D. Letzring;Jack Block;David C. Funder

  • Parental Agreement-Disagreement on Child Rearing Orientations and Gender-Related Personality Correlates in Children.

    Jeanne H. Block;Jack Block;Andrea Morrison

  • Nursery school personality and political orientation two decades later

    Jack Block;Jeanne H. Block

  • Studying Lives Through Time: Personality and Development

    David Charles Funder;Jack Block

  • The challenge of response sets

    Jerry S. Wiggins;Jack Block

  • Some Misgivings About the Matching Familiar Figures Test as a Measure of Reflection-Impulsivity.

    Jack Block;Jeanne H. Block;David M. Harrington

  • Personality antecedents of depressive tendencies in 18-year-olds: a prospective study.

    J H Block;P F Gjerde

  • Continuity and Change in Parents' Child-rearing Practices.

    Gail C. Roberts;Jeanne H. Block;Jack Block

  • Venturing a 30-Year Longitudinal Study.

    Jack Block;Jeanne H. Block

  • Development of antisocial and prosocial behavior : research, theories, and issues

    Dan Olweus;Jack Block;Marian Radke-Yarrow

Frequent Co-Authors

David C. Funder
David C. Funder University of California, Riverside
David M. Buss
David M. Buss The University of Texas at Austin
Magda Stouthamer-Loeber
Magda Stouthamer-Loeber University of Pittsburgh
Nathan Kogan
Nathan Kogan New School
Jerry S. Wiggins
Jerry S. Wiggins University of British Columbia
Avshalom Caspi
Avshalom Caspi Duke University
Jonathon D. Brown
Jonathon D. Brown University of Washington
Donald R. Lynam
Donald R. Lynam Purdue University West Lafayette
Shelley E. Taylor
Shelley E. Taylor University of California, Los Angeles
Terrie E. Moffitt
Terrie E. Moffitt Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in psychology, exploring related online degrees and career pathways can offer greater flexibility and diverse employment options. One popular route is pursuing a degree in social work. Online programs make it easier to study remotely, helping students balance education with other life responsibilities.

Affordability is a key concern when choosing an online degree. Fortunately, there are excellent choices for affordable social work programs in Michigan, providing high-quality education without a high price tag. For students near Minnesota, the most affordable social work degree programs in Minneapolis are worth considering as well.

If cost is a major factor, consider the cheapest social work degrees in Mississippi, which offer value while preparing graduates for rewarding careers. Urban learners may also find excellent opportunities with the cheapest social work programs in New York City.

Whether your goal is counseling, community outreach, or clinical practice, pursuing an online social work degree can be a versatile and affordable step forward in your psychology career journey.

Best Scientists Citing Jack Block

Recently Published Articles