World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Magda Stouthamer-Loeber

Magda Stouthamer-Loeber

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
91
Citations
39059
World Ranking
913
National Ranking
579

Magda Stouthamer-Loeber publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Magda Stouthamer-Loeber sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 167 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Magda Stouthamer-Loeber D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Magda Stouthamer-Loeber sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Magda Stouthamer-Loeber was affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh in the United States. Their research spanned mainly within the fields of psychology and social sciences, with a focus on both broad and specific subfields.

The primary subfields of study included sociology and political science, clinical psychology, and social psychology. Their work addressed various topics such as crime patterns and interventions, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, bullying, victimization, and aggression, child abuse and trauma, as well as criminal justice and corrections analysis.

The recent published paper by Stouthamer-Loeber included the 2021 study titled Cohort Profile: the Pittsburgh Youth Study (PYS), which appeared in the Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology. This publication had received citations indicative of academic engagement within its field.

Throughout their career, Stouthamer-Loeber collaborated frequently with several co-authors. These included Lia Ahonen, David P. Farrington, Dustin Pardini, and Rolf Loeber, each contributing to different aspects of their research output.

Stouthamer-Loeber's work was published in various academic venues, with noted publications in the Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology.

  • Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology

  • Cohort Profile: the Pittsburgh Youth Study (PYS), 2021, Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology

  • Lia Ahonen
  • David P. Farrington
  • Dustin Pardini
  • Rolf Loeber

  • Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis

  • Psychology
  • Social Sciences

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Social Psychology

Best Publications

  • Family Factors as Correlates and Predictors of Juvenile Conduct Problems and Delinquency

    Rolf Loeber;Magda Stouthamer-Loeber

  • The correlation of family management practices and delinquency.

    Gerald R. Patterson;Magda Stouthamer-Loeber

  • The Reactive-Proactive Aggression Questionnaire: Differential Correlates of Reactive and Proactive Aggression in Adolescent Boys.

    Adrian Raine;Kenneth A. Dodge;Rolf Loeber;Lisa Gatzke-Kopp

  • Development of juvenile aggression and violence. Some common misconceptions and controversies

    Rolf Loeber;Magda Stouthamer-Loeber

  • Measuring impulsivity and examining its relationship to delinquency.

    Jennifer L. White;Terrie E. Moffitt;Avshalom Caspi;Dawn Jeglum Bartusch

  • Antisocial Behavior and Mental Health Problems: Explanatory Factors in Childhood and Adolescence

    Rolf Loeber;David P. Farrington;Magda Stouthamer-Loeber;Welmoet B. Van Kammen

  • Developmental pathways in disruptive child behavior

    Rolf Loeber;Phen Wung;Kate Keenan;Bruce Giroux

  • Patterns and correlates of agreement between parent, teacher, and male adolescent ratings of externalizing and internalizing problems.

    Eric Youngstrom;Rolf Loeber;Magda Stouthamer-Loeber

  • Explaining the relation between IQ and delinquency: Class, race, test motivation, school failure, or self-control?

    Donald Lynam;Terrie E. Moffitt;Magda Stouthamer-Loeber

  • The “Little Five”: Exploring the Nomological Network of the Five-Factor Model of Personality in Adolescent Boys

    Oliver P. John;Avshalom Caspi;Richard W. Robins;Terrie E. Moffitt

  • Longitudinal Evidence that Psychopathy Scores in Early Adolescence Predict Adult Psychopathy

    Donald R. Lynam;Avshalom Caspi;Terrie E. Moffitt;Rolf Loeber

  • Resilient, Overcontrolled, and Undercontrolled Boys: Three Replicable Personality Types

    Richard W. Robins;Oliver P. John;Avshalom Caspi;Terrie E. Moffitt

  • The concentration of offenders in families, and family criminality in the prediction of boys' delinquency.

    David P. Farrington;Darrick Jolliffe;Rolf Loeber;Magda Stouthamer-Loeber

  • ARE SOME PEOPLE CRIME‐PRONE? REPLICATIONS OF THE PERSONALITY‐CRIME RELATIONSHIP ACROSS COUNTRIES, GENDERS, RACES, AND METHODS*

    Avshalom Caspi;Terrie E. Moffitt;Phil A. Silva;Magda Stouthamer‐Loeber

  • Familial risk factors to oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder: parental psychopathology and maternal parenting.

    Paul J. Frick;Benjamin B. Lahey;Rolf Loeber;Magda Stouthamer-Loeber

  • Risk and promotive effects in the explanation of persistent serious delinquency in boys

    Magda Stouthamer-Loeber;Rolf Loeber;Evelyn Wei;David P. Farrington

  • Initiation, escalation and desistance in juvenile offending and their correlates

    Rolf Loeber;M Stouthamerloeber;W Vankammen;David P. Farrington

  • Violence and Serious Theft : Development and Prediction from Childhood to Adulthood

    Rolf Loeber;Rolf Loeber;David P. Farrington;Magda Stouthamer-Loeber;Helene Raskin White

  • Neurocognitive Impairments in Boys on the Life-Course Persistent Antisocial Path

    Adrian Raine;Terrie E. Moffitt;Avshalom Caspi;Rolf Loeber

  • Role of test motivation in intelligence testing

    Angela Lee Duckworth;Patrick D. Quinn;Donald R. Lynam;Rolf Loeber

Frequent Co-Authors

Rolf Loeber
Rolf Loeber University of Pittsburgh
David P. Farrington
David P. Farrington University of Cambridge
Donald R. Lynam
Donald R. Lynam Purdue University West Lafayette
Terrie E. Moffitt
Terrie E. Moffitt Duke University
Helene R. White
Helene R. White Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Benjamin B. Lahey
Benjamin B. Lahey University of Chicago
Alison E. Hipwell
Alison E. Hipwell University of Pittsburgh
Avshalom Caspi
Avshalom Caspi Duke University
Dustin A. Pardini
Dustin A. Pardini Arizona State University
Adrian Raine
Adrian Raine University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a future in psychology opens the door to many diverse academic and professional opportunities across the United States. With rising demand for mental health professionals, pursuing psychology degrees offers flexible options, including both traditional and online formats.

For those seeking highly respected programs in metropolitan areas, the top psychology programs in Washington, D.C. offer rigorous training and networking opportunities in a vibrant city. Similarly, students in the Midwest can explore the top psychology degrees in Wichita, which combine strong academic support with practical fieldwork experiences.

Prospective students interested in programs with a more intimate learning environment may consider the best psychology degree rankings in Wyoming, which generally feature smaller class sizes and unique research opportunities.

For added flexibility, online options like the easiest online bachelor's in psychology degree programs in Florida provide accessible pathways for balancing study with work or family commitments.

Ultimately, whether you choose an on-campus or online route, the field of psychology offers a variety of programs and career pathways to suit your academic goals and lifestyle.

Best Scientists Citing Magda Stouthamer-Loeber

Recently Published Articles