World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Magda Stouthamer-Loeber

Magda Stouthamer-Loeber

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 91 913 579 167 39059

Magda Stouthamer-Loeber publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Magda Stouthamer-Loeber between 1984 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Magda Stouthamer-Loeber published across 38 years, from 1984 to 2021, averaging 4.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 1998. 2 of the 176 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 1998. 1984: 3 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 3 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 9 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 9 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 17 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 1 publication 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 2 publications
1984 2021

176 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Magda Stouthamer-Loeber: publications per year, 1984 to 2021
Year Publications
1984 3
1985 0
1986 3
1987 1
1988 1
1989 3
1990 2
1991 9
1992 4
1993 4
1994 5
1995 9
1996 6
1997 1
1998 17
1999 8
2000 5
2001 5
2002 9
2003 4
2004 6
2005 14
2006 7
2007 9
2008 7
2009 6
2010 8
2011 5
2012 6
2013 3
2014 0
2015 0
2016 2
2017 1
2018 1
2019 0
2020 0
2021 2
Total 176
Download as CSV

Magda Stouthamer-Loeber publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Magda Stouthamer-Loeber sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–170 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 167 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477 167
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Magda Stouthamer-Loeber D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Magda Stouthamer-Loeber sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 90–91 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77 91
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Magda Stouthamer-Loeber was affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh in the United States. Their research spanned mainly within the fields of psychology and social sciences, with a focus on both broad and specific subfields.

The primary subfields of study included sociology and political science, clinical psychology, and social psychology. Their work addressed various topics such as crime patterns and interventions, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, bullying, victimization, and aggression, child abuse and trauma, as well as criminal justice and corrections analysis.

The recent published paper by Stouthamer-Loeber included the 2021 study titled Cohort Profile: the Pittsburgh Youth Study (PYS), which appeared in the Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology. This publication had received citations indicative of academic engagement within its field.

Throughout their career, Stouthamer-Loeber collaborated frequently with several co-authors. These included Lia Ahonen, David P. Farrington, Dustin Pardini, and Rolf Loeber, each contributing to different aspects of their research output.

Stouthamer-Loeber's work was published in various academic venues, with noted publications in the Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology.

  • Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology

  • Cohort Profile: the Pittsburgh Youth Study (PYS), 2021, Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology

  • Lia Ahonen
  • David P. Farrington
  • Dustin Pardini
  • Rolf Loeber

  • Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis

  • Psychology
  • Social Sciences

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Social Psychology

Best Publications

  • Family Factors as Correlates and Predictors of Juvenile Conduct Problems and Delinquency

    Rolf Loeber;Magda Stouthamer-Loeber

  • The correlation of family management practices and delinquency.

    Gerald R. Patterson;Magda Stouthamer-Loeber

  • The Reactive-Proactive Aggression Questionnaire: Differential Correlates of Reactive and Proactive Aggression in Adolescent Boys.

    Adrian Raine;Kenneth A. Dodge;Rolf Loeber;Lisa Gatzke-Kopp

  • Development of juvenile aggression and violence. Some common misconceptions and controversies

    Rolf Loeber;Magda Stouthamer-Loeber

  • Measuring impulsivity and examining its relationship to delinquency.

    Jennifer L. White;Terrie E. Moffitt;Avshalom Caspi;Dawn Jeglum Bartusch

  • Antisocial Behavior and Mental Health Problems: Explanatory Factors in Childhood and Adolescence

    Rolf Loeber;David P. Farrington;Magda Stouthamer-Loeber;Welmoet B. Van Kammen

  • Developmental pathways in disruptive child behavior

    Rolf Loeber;Phen Wung;Kate Keenan;Bruce Giroux

  • Patterns and correlates of agreement between parent, teacher, and male adolescent ratings of externalizing and internalizing problems.

    Eric Youngstrom;Rolf Loeber;Magda Stouthamer-Loeber

  • Explaining the relation between IQ and delinquency: Class, race, test motivation, school failure, or self-control?

    Donald Lynam;Terrie E. Moffitt;Magda Stouthamer-Loeber

  • The “Little Five”: Exploring the Nomological Network of the Five-Factor Model of Personality in Adolescent Boys

    Oliver P. John;Avshalom Caspi;Richard W. Robins;Terrie E. Moffitt

  • Longitudinal Evidence that Psychopathy Scores in Early Adolescence Predict Adult Psychopathy

    Donald R. Lynam;Avshalom Caspi;Terrie E. Moffitt;Rolf Loeber

  • Resilient, Overcontrolled, and Undercontrolled Boys: Three Replicable Personality Types

    Richard W. Robins;Oliver P. John;Avshalom Caspi;Terrie E. Moffitt

  • The concentration of offenders in families, and family criminality in the prediction of boys' delinquency.

    David P. Farrington;Darrick Jolliffe;Rolf Loeber;Magda Stouthamer-Loeber

  • ARE SOME PEOPLE CRIME‐PRONE? REPLICATIONS OF THE PERSONALITY‐CRIME RELATIONSHIP ACROSS COUNTRIES, GENDERS, RACES, AND METHODS*

    Avshalom Caspi;Terrie E. Moffitt;Phil A. Silva;Magda Stouthamer‐Loeber

  • Familial risk factors to oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder: parental psychopathology and maternal parenting.

    Paul J. Frick;Benjamin B. Lahey;Rolf Loeber;Magda Stouthamer-Loeber

  • Risk and promotive effects in the explanation of persistent serious delinquency in boys

    Magda Stouthamer-Loeber;Rolf Loeber;Evelyn Wei;David P. Farrington

  • Initiation, escalation and desistance in juvenile offending and their correlates

    Rolf Loeber;M Stouthamerloeber;W Vankammen;David P. Farrington

  • Violence and Serious Theft : Development and Prediction from Childhood to Adulthood

    Rolf Loeber;Rolf Loeber;David P. Farrington;Magda Stouthamer-Loeber;Helene Raskin White

  • Neurocognitive Impairments in Boys on the Life-Course Persistent Antisocial Path

    Adrian Raine;Terrie E. Moffitt;Avshalom Caspi;Rolf Loeber

  • Role of test motivation in intelligence testing

    Angela Lee Duckworth;Patrick D. Quinn;Donald R. Lynam;Rolf Loeber

Frequent Co-Authors

Rolf Loeber
Rolf Loeber University of Pittsburgh
David P. Farrington
David P. Farrington University of Cambridge
Donald R. Lynam
Donald R. Lynam Purdue University West Lafayette
Terrie E. Moffitt
Terrie E. Moffitt Duke University
Helene R. White
Helene R. White Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Benjamin B. Lahey
Benjamin B. Lahey University of Chicago
Alison E. Hipwell
Alison E. Hipwell University of Pittsburgh
Avshalom Caspi
Avshalom Caspi Duke University
Dustin A. Pardini
Dustin A. Pardini Arizona State University
Adrian Raine
Adrian Raine University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a future in psychology opens the door to many diverse academic and professional opportunities across the United States. With rising demand for mental health professionals, pursuing psychology degrees offers flexible options, including both traditional and online formats.

For those seeking highly respected programs in metropolitan areas, the top psychology programs in Washington, D.C. offer rigorous training and networking opportunities in a vibrant city. Similarly, students in the Midwest can explore the top psychology degrees in Wichita, which combine strong academic support with practical fieldwork experiences.

Prospective students interested in programs with a more intimate learning environment may consider the best psychology degree rankings in Wyoming, which generally feature smaller class sizes and unique research opportunities.

For added flexibility, online options like the easiest online bachelor's in psychology degree programs in Florida provide accessible pathways for balancing study with work or family commitments.

Ultimately, whether you choose an on-campus or online route, the field of psychology offers a variety of programs and career pathways to suit your academic goals and lifestyle.

Best Scientists Citing Magda Stouthamer-Loeber

Recently Published Articles