World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
John F. Rauthmann

John F. Rauthmann

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 44 6908 6439 329 323 140 9215

John F. Rauthmann publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by John F. Rauthmann between 2009 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. John F. Rauthmann published across 17 years, from 2009 to 2025, averaging 10.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2017. 25 of the 178 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2009 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2017. 2009: 3 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 19 publications 2017: 23 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 12 publications
2009 2025

178 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
John F. Rauthmann: publications per year, 2009 to 2025
Year Publications
2009 3
2010 3
2011 7
2012 5
2013 8
2014 9
2015 12
2016 19
2017 23
2018 8
2019 4
2020 18
2021 15
2022 10
2023 9
2024 13
2025 12
Total 178
Download as CSV

John F. Rauthmann publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John F. Rauthmann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 140 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 140
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

John F. Rauthmann D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John F. Rauthmann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558 44
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

John F. Rauthmann is affiliated with Bielefeld University in Germany and has a prominent presence in the field of psychology, with a particular focus on personality research. Their extensive publication record spans over 110 works in the psychology domain, encompassing various subfields including clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, social psychology, applied psychology, and intersections with sociology and political science.

Their research covers several key topics, notably personality traits and psychology, mental health research topics, behavioral health and interventions, cultural differences and values, social and intergroup psychology, personality disorders and psychopathology, as well as psychological testing and assessment.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Rauthmann include Niclas Kuper, Le Vy Phan, Nick Modersitzki, Ryne A. Sherman, and Mitja D. Back. These collaborations reflect a network of joint research efforts within the field.

Rauthmann has contributed regularly to a number of prominent publication venues such as the European Journal of Personality, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, PLoS ONE, Psychologische Rundschau, and The Wiley Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences.

Selected recent publications feature:

  • "Who Is Impacted? Personality Predicts Individual Differences in Psychological Consequences of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany" (2020) in Social Psychological and Personality Science
  • "Unveiling an exclusive link: Predicting behavior with personality, situation perception, and affect in a preregistered experience sampling study." (2020) in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  • "The dynamics, processes, mechanisms, and functioning of personality: An overview of the field" (2021) in British Journal of Psychology
  • "Personality computing: New frontiers in personality assessment" (2021) in Social and Personality Psychology Compass
  • "The Situation of Situation Research: Knowns and Unknowns" (2020) in Current Directions in Psychological Science

Best Publications

  • Narcissistic admiration and rivalry: disentangling the bright and dark sides of narcissism.

    Mitja D. Back;Albrecht C. P. Küfner;Michael Dufner;Tanja M. Gerlach

  • The Situational Eight DIAMONDS: a taxonomy of major dimensions of situation characteristics.

    John F. Rauthmann;David Gallardo-Pujol;Esther M. Guillaume;Elysia Todd

  • The Dark Triad and Interpersonal Perception: Similarities and Differences in the Social Consequences of Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and Psychopathy:

    John F. Rauthmann

  • How ''dark'' are the Dark Triad traits? Examining the perceived darkness of narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy

    John F. Rauthmann;Gerald P. Kolar

  • Principles of Situation Research: Towards a Better Understanding of Psychological Situations

    John F. Rauthmann;Ryne A. Sherman;David C. Funder

  • The independent effects of personality and situations on real-time expressions of behavior and emotion.

    Ryne A. Sherman;John F. Rauthmann;Nicolas A. Brown;David G. Serfass

  • Proposing a Multidimensional Machiavellianism Conceptualization

    John F. Rauthmann;Theresa Will

  • Narcissism and romantic relationships: The differential impact of narcissistic admiration and rivalry.

    Stefanie N. Wurst;Tanja M. Gerlach;Michael Dufner;John F. Rauthmann

  • Is there a ''dark intelligence''? Emotional intelligence is used by dark personalities to emotionally manipulate others

    Ursa K.J. Nagler;Katharina J. Reiter;Marco R. Furtner;John F. Rauthmann

  • Leading yourself and leading others: Linking self-leadership to transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership

    Marco R. Furtner;Urs Baldegger;John F. Rauthmann

  • Personality-driven situation experience, contact, and construal: How people’s personality traits predict characteristics of their situations in daily life.

    John F. Rauthmann;Ryne A. Sherman;Christopher S. Nave;David C. Funder

  • Reliability and validity of the Turkish versions of Dark Triad Dirty Dozen (DTDD-T), Short Dark Triad (SD3-T), and Single Item Narcissism Scale (SINS-T)

    Emrah Özsoy;John F. Rauthmann;Peter K. Jonason;Kadir Ardıç

  • Eyes as windows to the soul: Gazing behavior is related to personality

    John F. Rauthmann;Christian T. Seubert;Pierre Sachse;Marco R. Furtner

  • Are Narcissists Sexy? Zeroing in on the Effect of Narcissism on Short-Term Mate Appeal

    Michael Dufner;John F. Rauthmann;Anna Z. Czarna;Jaap J. A. Denissen

  • The perceived attractiveness and traits of the Dark Triad: Narcissists are perceived as hot, Machiavellians and psychopaths not

    John F. Rauthmann;Gerald P. Kolar

  • Positioning the Dark Triad in the interpersonal circumplex: The friendly-dominant narcissist, hostile-submissive Machiavellian, and hostile-dominant psychopath?

    John F. Rauthmann;Gerald P. Kolar

  • Investigating the MACH–IV With Item Response Theory and Proposing the Trimmed MACH*

    John F Rauthmann

  • The Self-Loving Self-Leader: An Examination of the Relationship Between Self-Leadership and the Dark Triad

    Marco R. Furtner;John F. Rauthmann;Pierre Sachse

  • Acquisitive or protective self-presentation of dark personalities? Associations among the Dark Triad and self-monitoring

    John F. Rauthmann

  • Ultra-Brief Measures for the Situational Eight DIAMONDS Domains

    John F. Rauthmann;Ryne A. Sherman

Frequent Co-Authors

Ryne A. Sherman
Ryne A. Sherman Florida Atlantic University
Matthias Ziegler
Matthias Ziegler Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Jaap J. A. Denissen
Jaap J. A. Denissen Utrecht University
David C. Funder
David C. Funder University of California, Riverside
Brent W. Roberts
Brent W. Roberts University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Ulrich Trautwein
Ulrich Trautwein University of Tübingen
Mitja D. Back
Mitja D. Back University of Münster
Anu Realo
Anu Realo University of Warwick
Maike Luhmann
Maike Luhmann Ruhr University Bochum
Emanuel Jauk
Emanuel Jauk TU Dresden

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology online degrees opens up diverse career pathways—such as counseling, human resources, research, and mental health services. The value of your degree can depend on factors like program reputation, affordability, faculty expertise, and graduate outcomes. For example, the most valuable psychology programs in Raleigh emphasize practical skills and strong support networks, making them ideal for students seeking entry into health and social services.

In the Midwest, students can consider the best value psychology programs in St. Louis, which balance quality education with affordability, leading to promising career outcomes. In the South, the most valuable psychology degrees in South Carolina offer flexible learning options and emphasize community engagement, which is essential for those interested in social work or public health.

Students considering the Southeast will find that the most valuable psychology programs in Tampa focus on internships and real-world experience—key advantages for anyone looking to enter psychology-related careers. No matter where you begin your journey, choosing a highly ranked, value-driven online psychology degree can expand your career prospects and enhance your ability to make a lasting impact.

Best Scientists Citing John F. Rauthmann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles