World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 40 8246 7699 4413 4018 115 6694

Ryne A. Sherman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ryne A. Sherman between 2006 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ryne A. Sherman published across 20 years, from 2006 to 2025, averaging 6.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2017. 5 of the 133 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2017. 2006: 2 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 2 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 1 publication 2013: 10 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 5 publications
2006 2025

133 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ryne A. Sherman: publications per year, 2006 to 2025
Year Publications
2006 2
2007 2
2008 1
2009 2
2010 2
2011 1
2012 1
2013 10
2014 11
2015 13
2016 15
2017 16
2018 6
2019 13
2020 11
2021 9
2022 10
2023 3
2024 0
2025 5
Total 133
Download as CSV

Ryne A. Sherman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ryne A. Sherman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 115 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 115
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Ryne A. Sherman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ryne A. Sherman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 40
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Ryne A. Sherman is affiliated with Florida Atlantic University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Psychology, with a total of 36 publications contributing to this field.

Their work extends into several subfields of study including Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Applied Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, and Social Psychology. Sherman's research topics cover a range of areas such as Personality Traits and Psychology, Mental Health Research Topics, Behavioral Health and Interventions, Social and Intergroup Psychology, Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior, Personality Disorders and Psychopathology, as well as Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences.

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Sherman include:

  • Unveiling an exclusive link: Predicting behavior with personality, situation perception, and affect in a preregistered experience sampling study, 2020, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  • The Situation of Situation Research: Knowns and Unknowns, 2020, Current Directions in Psychological Science
  • Personality and the perception of situations: The Big Five and Dark Triad traits, 2020, Personality and Individual Differences
  • Individual differences in contingencies between situation characteristics and personality states, 2022, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  • Twenty years on the dark side: Six lessons about bad leadership, 2021, Consulting psychology journal

Sherman has frequently collaborated with several researchers in their field. Notable frequent co-authors include:

  • John F. Rauthmann
  • Kai T. Horstmann
  • Robert Hogan
  • Andrew B. Blake
  • Michael J. Boudreaux

Their work has appeared multiple times in several academic venues, including:

  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  • Personality and Individual Differences
  • Consulting psychology journal
  • European Journal of Personality
  • Academy of Management Proceedings

Best Publications

  • The Situational Eight DIAMONDS: a taxonomy of major dimensions of situation characteristics.

    John F. Rauthmann;David Gallardo-Pujol;Esther M. Guillaume;Elysia Todd

  • Principles of Situation Research: Towards a Better Understanding of Psychological Situations

    John F. Rauthmann;Ryne A. Sherman;David C. Funder

  • Changes in American Adults’ Sexual Behavior and Attitudes, 1972–2012

    Jean M. Twenge;Ryne A. Sherman;Brooke E. Wells

  • The independent effects of personality and situations on real-time expressions of behavior and emotion.

    Ryne A. Sherman;John F. Rauthmann;Nicolas A. Brown;David G. Serfass

  • Situational similarity and personality predict behavioral consistency.

    Ryne A. Sherman;Christopher S. Nave;David C. Funder

  • Changes in American Adults’ Reported Same-Sex Sexual Experiences and Attitudes, 1973–2014

    Jean M. Twenge;Ryne A. Sherman;Brooke E. Wells

  • New Talent Signals: Shiny New Objects or a Brave New World?

    Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic;Dave Winsborough;Ryne A. Sherman;Robert Hogan

  • Personality-driven situation experience, contact, and construal: How people’s personality traits predict characteristics of their situations in daily life.

    John F. Rauthmann;Ryne A. Sherman;Christopher S. Nave;David C. Funder

  • Declines in Sexual Frequency among American Adults, 1989–2014

    Jean M. Twenge;Ryne A. Sherman;Brooke E. Wells

  • Properties of persons and situations related to overall and distinctive personality-behavior congruence

    Ryne A. Sherman;Christopher S. Nave;David C. Funder

  • Situational construal is related to personality and gender

    Ryne A. Sherman;Christopher S. Nave;David C. Funder

  • Ultra-Brief Measures for the Situational Eight DIAMONDS Domains

    John F. Rauthmann;Ryne A. Sherman

  • The datafication of talent: how technology is advancing the science of human potential at work

    Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic;Reece Akhtar;Dave Winsborough;Ryne A Sherman

  • How Are Curious People Viewed and How Do They Behave in Social Situations? From the Perspectives of Self, Friends, Parents, and Unacquainted Observers

    Todd B. Kashdan;Ryne A. Sherman;Jessica Yarbro;David C. Funder

  • Beyond Self-Report in the Study of Hedonic and Eudaimonic Well-Being: Correlations with Acquaintance Reports, Clinician Judgments and Directly Observed Social Behavior.

    Christopher S. Nave;Ryne A. Sherman;David C. Funder

  • Sexual Inactivity During Young Adulthood Is More Common Among U.S. Millennials and iGen: Age, Period, and Cohort Effects on Having No Sexual Partners After Age 18

    Jean M. Twenge;Ryne A. Sherman;Brooke E. Wells

  • The behavioral correlates of overall and distinctive life history strategy.

    Ryne A. Sherman;Aurelio José Figueredo;David C. Funder

  • Declines in American Adults’ Religious Participation and Beliefs, 1972-2014:

    Jean M. Twenge;Ryne A. Sherman;Julie J. Exline;Joshua B. Grubbs

  • Evaluating correlations in studies of personality and behavior: Beyond the number of significant findings to be expected by chance

    Ryne A. Sherman;David C. Funder

  • On the Contextual Independence of Personality: Teachers' Assessments Predict Directly Observed Behavior after Four Decades.

    Christopher S. Nave;Ryne A. Sherman;David C. Funder;Sarah E. Hampson

  • Measuring the Situational Eight DIAMONDS Characteristics of Situations An Optimization of the RSQ-8 to the S8*

    John F. Rauthmann;Ryne A. Sherman

  • Directionality of Person–Situation Transactions: Are There Spillovers Among and Between Situation Experiences And Personality States?

    John F. Rauthmann;Ashley Bell Jones;Ryne A. Sherman

Frequent Co-Authors

John F. Rauthmann
John F. Rauthmann Bielefeld University
David C. Funder
David C. Funder University of California, Riverside
Jean M. Twenge
Jean M. Twenge San Diego State University
Robert Hogan
Robert Hogan Johns Hopkins University
Matthias Ziegler
Matthias Ziegler Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic
Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic University College London
Dustin Wood
Dustin Wood University of Alabama
Lewis R. Goldberg
Lewis R. Goldberg Oregon Research Institute
Peter D. Harms
Peter D. Harms University of Alabama
W. Keith Campbell
W. Keith Campbell University of Georgia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology and counseling opens the door to diverse career opportunities in mental health, education, business, and more. Flexible online programs make it easier to balance studies with work or family commitments, and many options offer excellent value and accreditation.

For those interested in counseling, consider reviewing the most valuable counseling master's programs in Florida or broaden your search to the most valuable counseling master's degrees in the South. These rankings help identify programs that combine affordability with strong graduate outcomes.

Looking for programs in the Northeast? The best value counseling programs in New York highlight schools with excellent support and career prospects. If your interest leans toward psychology, check out these online psychology programs in Alabama for reputable bachelor's and graduate degrees you can pursue remotely.

Before choosing a program, consider accreditation, cost, licensure requirements, and the specific career pathway you hope to pursue. An online degree in psychology or counseling can be a flexible, valuable next step toward a rewarding profession.

Best Scientists Citing Ryne A. Sherman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles