World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 38 8760 8181 4660 4242 85 8228

Dustin Wood publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Dustin Wood between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Dustin Wood published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 4.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2013. 11 of the 102 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2013. 2005: 1 publication 2006: 5 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 4 publications
2005 2025

102 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Dustin Wood: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 1
2006 5
2007 3
2008 3
2009 3
2010 5
2011 2
2012 4
2013 9
2014 5
2015 6
2016 6
2017 9
2018 7
2019 7
2020 7
2021 4
2022 2
2023 3
2024 7
2025 4
Total 102
Download as CSV

Dustin Wood publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dustin Wood sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 85 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605 85
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Dustin Wood D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dustin Wood sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641 38
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Dustin Wood is affiliated with the University of Alabama in the United States and has contributed extensively to the fields of psychology and social sciences. Their research spans multiple subfields including clinical psychology, social psychology, applied psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, as well as organizational behavior and human resource management.

The scientist's work frequently addresses topics related to personality traits and psychology, mental health research, personality disorders and psychopathology, job satisfaction and organizational behavior, social and intergroup psychology, behavioral health and interventions, and emotional intelligence and performance.

Recent publications include:

  • Descriptive, Predictive and Explanatory Personality Research: Different Goals, Different Approaches, but a Shared Need to Move beyond the Big Few Traits (2020), published in European Journal of Personality
  • Bottom Up Construction of a Personality Taxonomy (2020), published in European Journal of Psychological Assessment
  • Does leadership still not need emotional intelligence? Continuing "The Great EI Debate" (2021), published in The Leadership Quarterly
  • Leadership perceptions, gender, and dominant personality: The role of normality evaluations (2020), published in Journal of Research in Personality
  • Selection tests work better than we think they do, and have for years (2024), published in Industrial and Organizational Psychology

Frequently collaborating with other researchers, Dustin Wood has coauthored numerous papers with colleagues such as:

  • Peter D. Harms
  • P. D. Harms
  • Graham H. Lowman
  • Emmanuel Kofi Adanu
  • René Mõttus

Their work has appeared in a range of publication venues, with multiple contributions to:

  • Journal of Research in Personality
  • The Wiley Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences
  • European Journal of Personality
  • European Journal of Psychological Assessment
  • The Leadership Quarterly

Best Publications

  • The development of personality traits in adulthood.

    Brent W. Roberts;Dustin Wood;Avshalom Caspi

  • Evaluating Five Factor Theory and social investment perspectives on personality trait development

    Brent W. Roberts;Dustin Wood;Jennifer L. Smith

  • Personality Development in the Context of the Neo-Socioanalytic Model of Personality.

    Brent W. Roberts;Dustin Wood

  • Integrating Personality Structure, Personality Process, and Personality Development:

    Anna Baumert;Anna Baumert;Manfred Schmitt;Marco Perugini;Wendy Johnson

  • What do conscientious people do? Development and validation of the Behavioral Indicators of Conscientiousness (BIC)

    Joshua J. Jackson;Dustin Wood;Tim Bogg;Kate E. Walton

  • Lay Theory of Race Affects and Moderates Asian Americans' Responses Toward American Culture

    Sun No;Ying-yi Hong;Hsin-Ya Liao;Kyoungmi Lee

  • Self‐Regulation Underlies Temperament and Personality: An Integrative Developmental Framework

    Jaap J. A. Denissen;Marcel A. G. van Aken;Lars Penke;Dustin Wood

  • Perceptions and expectations of autonomous vehicles – A snapshot of vulnerable road user opinion

    Praveena Penmetsa;Emmanuel Kofi Adanu;Dustin Wood;Teng Wang

  • Response Speed and Response Consistency as Mutually Validating Indicators of Data Quality in Online Samples

    Dustin Wood;P. D. Harms;Graham H. Lowman;Justin A. DeSimone

  • Not all conscientiousness scales change alike: a multimethod, multisample study of age differences in the facets of conscientiousness.

    Joshua J. Jackson;Tim Bogg;Kate E. Walton;Dustin Wood

  • Perceiver effects as projective tests: what your perceptions of others say about you.

    Dustin Wood;Peter D. Harms;Simine Vazire

  • A Three–Part Framework for Self–Regulated Personality Development across Adulthood:

    Marie Hennecke;Wiebke Bleidorn;Jaap J. A. Denissen;Dustin Wood

  • Cross-sectional and longitudinal tests of the Personality and Role Identity Structural Model (PRISM).

    Dustin Wood;Brent W. Roberts

  • Autocratic leaders and authoritarian followers revisited: A review and agenda for the future.

    P.D. Harms;Dustin Wood;Karen Landay;Paul B. Lester

  • Mechanisms of health: Education and health-related behaviours partially mediate the relationship between conscientiousness and self-reported physical health

    Jennifer Lodi-Smith;Joshua Jackson;Tim Bogg;Kate Walton

  • How functionalist and process approaches to behavior can explain trait covariation.

    Dustin Wood;Molly Hensler Gardner;Peter D. Harms

  • The Correlates of Similarity Estimates Are Often Misleadingly Positive The Nature and Scope of the Problem, and Some Solutions

    Dustin Wood;R. Michael Furr

  • Using revealed mate preferences to evaluate market force and differential preference explanations for mate selection.

    Dustin Wood;Claudia Chloe Brumbaugh

  • The personality traits of liked people

    Jessica Wortman;Dustin Wood

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter D. Harms
Peter D. Harms University of Alabama
Brent W. Roberts
Brent W. Roberts University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
R. Michael Furr
R. Michael Furr Wake Forest University
Jaap J. A. Denissen
Jaap J. A. Denissen Utrecht University
Wendy Johnson
Wendy Johnson University of Edinburgh
René Mõttus
René Mõttus University of Edinburgh
Joshua J. Jackson
Joshua J. Jackson Washington University in St. Louis
Manfred Schmitt
Manfred Schmitt University of Koblenz and Landau
Marco Perugini
Marco Perugini University of Milano-Bicocca
Michael D. Robinson
Michael D. Robinson North Dakota State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens up diverse online degree options and career pathways, especially in fields like behavior analysis, counseling, and mental health. To pursue specialized careers, such as a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), students must complete accredited graduate education and supervised fieldwork before taking certification exams. However, requirements can differ based on location.

For example, those interested in Santa Ana bcba education requirements should review both degree and experience criteria specific to that area. If you are considering certification elsewhere, check the bcba certification requirements in Scottsdale or learn how to become a bcba in Seattle. Each city may have its own combination of academic, practical, and licensing steps.

For students exploring new opportunities, understanding the Spokane bcba requirements can also offer insights into regional differences. Online degrees in psychology, counseling, or applied behavior analysis are convenient and flexible ways to fulfill these requirements, ensuring you are prepared for competitive and meaningful careers across the U.S.

Best Scientists Citing Dustin Wood

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles