World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
59
Citations
18909
World Ranking
3647
National Ranking
2047

Overview

Peter D. Harms is affiliated with the University of Alabama in the United States and has a research focus centered primarily in the field of Psychology. Their scholarly work covers a range of subfields including Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science, and Gender Studies.

Their research themes encompass several main topics such as Personality Traits and Psychology, Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior, Emotional Intelligence and Performance, Gender Diversity and Inequality, Social and Intergroup Psychology, Employment and Welfare Studies, and Information and Cyber Security.

Peter D. Harms has contributed to multiple scholarly articles published in reputable venues. Recent publications include:

  • Does leadership still not need emotional intelligence? Continuing "The Great EI Debate" (2021), The Leadership Quarterly
  • CEO dark personality: A critical review, bibliometric analysis, and research agenda (2022), Personality and Individual Differences
  • Birds of a feather?: Firm sales growth and narcissism in the upper echelons at the CEO-TMT interface (2022), The Leadership Quarterly
  • Editorial: Addressing the nurse workforce crisis: a call for greater integration of the organizational behavior, human resource management and nursing literatures (2022), Journal of Managerial Psychology
  • Leadership perceptions, gender, and dominant personality: The role of normality evaluations (2020), Journal of Research in Personality

The scientist frequently publishes in several significant scholarly venues which include:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Personality and Individual Differences
  • Journal of Managerial Psychology
  • Journal of Business Research
  • Industrial and Organizational Psychology

Collaboration has been a part of their research approach, working repeatedly with several co-authors. Among the most frequent collaborators are:

  • Dustin Wood
  • Tyler N. A. Fezzey
  • Cameron J. Borgholthaus
  • Xin Liu
  • Alaric Bourgoin

Best Publications

  • Much ado about grit: A meta-analytic synthesis of the grit literature.

    Marcus Credé;Michael C. Tynan;Peter D. Harms

  • Emotional intelligence and transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analysis.

    Peter D. Harms;Marcus Credé

  • Gender differences in narcissism: A meta-analytic review.

    Emily Grijalva;Daniel A. Newman;Louis Tay;M. Brent Donnellan

  • Leadership efficacy: Review and future directions

    Sean T. Hannah;Bruce Avolio;Fred Luthans;Peter D. Harms

  • Best practice recommendations for data screening.

    Justin A. DeSimone;Peter D. Harms;Alice J. DeSimone

  • Narcissism and Leadership: A Meta-Analytic Review of Linear and Nonlinear Relationships

    Emily Grijalva;Peter D. Harms;Daniel A. Newman;Blaine H. Gaddis

  • The over-claiming technique: measuring self-enhancement independent of ability.

    Delroy L. Paulhus;Peter D. Harms;M. Nadine Bruce;Daria C. Lysy

  • The dark side of personality at work

    Seth M. Spain;Peter D. Harms;James M. Lebreton

  • An evaluation of the consequences of using short measures of the Big Five personality traits.

    Marcus Credé;Peter D. Harms;Sarah Niehorster;Andrea Gaye-Valentine

  • Leadership and stress: A meta-analytic review

    Peter D. Harms;Marcus Credé;Michael C. Tynan;Matthew R. Leon

  • Can resilience be developed at work? A meta-analytic review of resilience-building programme effectiveness

    Adam J. Vanhove;Mitchel N. Herian;Alycia L. U. Perez;Peter D. Harms

  • Meeting the Leadership Challenge of Employee Well-Being Through Relationship PsyCap and Health PsyCap

    Fred Luthans;Carolyn M. Youssef;David S. Sweetman;Peter D. Harms

  • Leader development and the dark side of personality

    Peter D. Harms;Seth M. Spain;Sean T. Hannah

  • What do conscientious people do? Development and validation of the Behavioral Indicators of Conscientiousness (BIC)

    Joshua J. Jackson;Dustin Wood;Tim Bogg;Kate E. Walton

  • Systems Perspective of Amazon Mechanical Turk for Organizational Research: Review and Recommendations.

    Melissa G. Keith;Louis Tay;Peter D. Harms

  • Adult attachment styles in the workplace

    Peter D. Harms

  • Reciprocal relationship between proactive personality and work characteristics: a latent change score approach

    Wen-Dong Li;Doris Fay;Michael Frese;Peter D. Harms

  • Narcissism: An Integrative Synthesis and Dominance Complementarity Model

    Emily Grijalva;Peter D. Harms

  • Mentoring Impact on Leader Efficacy Development: A Field Experiment

    Paul B. Lester;Sean T. Hannah;Peter D. Harms;Gretchen R. Vogelgesang

  • Dirty Data: The Effects of Screening Respondents Who Provide Low-Quality Data in Survey Research

    Justin A. DeSimone;P. D. Harms

  • Not all conscientiousness scales change alike: a multimethod, multisample study of age differences in the facets of conscientiousness.

    Joshua J. Jackson;Tim Bogg;Kate E. Walton;Dustin Wood

Frequent Co-Authors

Dustin Wood
Dustin Wood University of Alabama
Marcus Credé
Marcus Credé Iowa State University
Brent W. Roberts
Brent W. Roberts University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Joshua J. Jackson
Joshua J. Jackson Washington University in St. Louis
Fred Luthans
Fred Luthans University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Delroy L. Paulhus
Delroy L. Paulhus University of British Columbia
Sean T. Hannah
Sean T. Hannah Wake Forest University
Louis Tay
Louis Tay Purdue University West Lafayette
Bruce J. Avolio
Bruce J. Avolio University of Washington
Samuel D. Gosling
Samuel D. Gosling The University of Texas at Austin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing an online psychology degree opens up diverse academic and career opportunities. Many accredited universities across the USA now offer affordable online programs, providing flexibility for working professionals, parents, or those with other commitments.

Cost is a significant factor when choosing a program. Prospective students can explore the cheapest online psychology bachelor's in Colorado, or consider programs in the South, such as the cheapest online psychology bachelor's in Florida. Other states with affordable options include Georgia—see the most affordable online bachelor's in psychology degree programs in Georgia—and Minnesota, where students can review details on the cheapest online psychology bachelor's in Minnesota.

Graduates with an online psychology degree can pursue roles in counseling, human resources, social work, and more. Many choose to continue their education with advanced degrees, such as a master's or doctorate, to unlock further career opportunities in research, academia, or clinical practice. Online degrees can also serve as a foundation for related fields, including education, business, and health services.

Best Scientists Citing Peter D. Harms

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles