World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 104 509 443 324 273 249 56389

W. Keith Campbell publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by W. Keith Campbell between 1990 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. W. Keith Campbell published across 36 years, from 1990 to 2025, averaging 7.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2017. 5 of the 261 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2017. 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 21 publications 2017: 22 publications 2018: 19 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 3 publications
1990 2025

261 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
W. Keith Campbell: publications per year, 1990 to 2025
Year Publications
1990 1
1991 1
1992 1
1993 0
1994 2
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 3
1999 5
2000 5
2001 5
2002 5
2003 4
2004 7
2005 5
2006 10
2007 10
2008 14
2009 8
2010 10
2011 8
2012 12
2013 17
2014 11
2015 11
2016 21
2017 22
2018 19
2019 15
2020 9
2021 6
2022 4
2023 5
2024 2
2025 3
Total 261
Download as CSV

W. Keith Campbell publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where W. Keith Campbell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 241–250 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 249 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196 249
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

W. Keith Campbell D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where W. Keith Campbell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 104–105 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 104 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53 104
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

W. Keith Campbell is affiliated with the University of Georgia in the United States. Their primary field of study is psychology, with a strong focus on clinical psychology, social psychology, and related subfields such as sociology and political science, marketing, and experimental and cognitive psychology.

The research mainly explores several key topics including personality traits and psychology, psychedelics and drug studies, personality disorders and psychopathology, consumer behavior in brand consumption and identification, psychological well-being and life satisfaction, cultural differences and values, and chemical synthesis and alkaloids.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Campbell include:

  • Underestimating digital media harm, 2020, Nature Human Behaviour
  • Country-level correlates of the Dark Triad traits in 49 countries, 2020, Journal of Personality
  • Examining changes in personality following shamanic ceremonial use of ayahuasca, 2021, Scientific Reports
  • Age and gender differences in narcissism: A comprehensive study across eight measures and over 250,000 participants, 2023, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  • Prospective examination of the therapeutic role of psychological flexibility and cognitive reappraisal in the ceremonial use of ayahuasca, 2022, Journal of Psychopharmacology

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Brandon Weiss
  • Joshua D. Miller
  • Jean M. Twenge
  • Patrick Charles Doyle
  • Jonathan Haidt

Key publication venues where Campbell's work has appeared are:

  • Personality and Individual Differences
  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • Journal of Research in Personality
  • Nature Human Behaviour
  • Journal of Personality

Campbell's output spans multiple aspects of psychology, integrating personality-related research with studies on psychedelics and psychopathology. The intersection of personality disorders, consumer behavior, and psychological well-being also forms a considerable part of their research portfolio. Their work encompasses both theoretical and applied dimensions of these areas.

Best Publications

  • The Narcissism Epidemic: Living in the Age of Entitlement

    Jean M. Twenge;W. Keith Campbell

  • Narcissism and Social Networking Web Sites

    Laura E. Buffardi;W. Keith Campbell

  • Psychological entitlement: interpersonal consequences and validation of a self-report measure.

    W Keith Campbell;Angelica M Bonacci;Jeremy Shelton;Julie J Exline

  • Egos inflating over time: a cross-temporal meta-analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory.

    Jean M. Twenge;Sara Konrath;Joshua D. Foster;W. Keith Campbell

  • Parenthood and Marital Satisfaction: A Meta-Analytic Review.

    Jean M. Twenge;W. Keith Campbell;Craig A. Foster

  • A Multilab Preregistered Replication of the Ego-Depletion Effect

    Martin S. Hagger;Nikos L. D. Chatzisarantis

  • Self-threat magnifies the self-serving bias: A meta-analytic integration.

    W. Keith Campbell;Constantine Sedikides

  • Narcissism, Self-Esteem, and the Positivity of Self-Views: Two Portraits of Self-Love

    W. Keith Campbell;Eric A. Rudich;Constantine Sedikides

  • “Isn’t It Fun to Get the Respect That We’re Going to Deserve?” Narcissism, Social Rejection, and Aggression

    Jean M. Twenge;W. Keith Campbell

  • Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism: a nomological network analysis.

    Joshua D. Miller;Brian J. Hoffman;Eric T. Gaughan;Brittany Gentile

  • Narcissism, Confidence, and Risk Attitude

    W. Keith Campbell;Adam S. Goodie;Joshua D. Foster

  • Self-Esteem, Narcissism, and Aggression Does Violence Result From Low Self-Esteem or From Threatened Egotism?

    Roy F. Baumeister;Brad J. Bushman;W. Keith Campbell

  • The role of mindfulness in romantic relationship satisfaction and responses to relationship stress.

    Sean Barnes;Kirk Warren Brown;Elizabeth Krusemark;W. Keith Campbell

  • Generational differences in young adults' life goals, concern for others, and civic orientation, 1966-2009.

    Jean M. Twenge;W. Keith Campbell;Elise C. Freeman

  • Mood-congruent recall of affectively toned stimuli: A meta-analytic review

    Georg E. Matt;Carmelo Vázquez;W.Keith Campbell

  • Associations between screen time and lower psychological well-being among children and adolescents: Evidence from a population-based study

    Jean M. Twenge;W. Keith Campbell

  • Individual differences in narcissism: Inflated self-views across the lifespan and around the world

    Joshua D. Foster;W. Keith Campbell;Jean M. Twenge

  • Comparing clinical and social-personality conceptualizations of narcissism.

    Joshua D. Miller;W. Keith Campbell

  • Age and Birth Cohort Differences in Self-Esteem: A Cross-Temporal Meta-Analysis

    Jean M. Twenge;W. Keith Campbell

  • Narcissism in organizational contexts

    W. Keith Campbell;Brian J. Hoffman;Stacy M. Campbell;Gaia Marchisio

  • Self-control and accommodation in close relationships: an interdependence analysis.

    Eli J. Finkel;W. Keith Campbell

  • Self-Esteem and Socioeconomic Status: A Meta-Analytic Review

    Jean M. Twenge;W. Keith Campbell

Frequent Co-Authors

Joshua D. Miller
Joshua D. Miller University of Georgia
Jean M. Twenge
Jean M. Twenge San Diego State University
Donald R. Lynam
Donald R. Lynam Purdue University West Lafayette
Joshua D. Foster
Joshua D. Foster University of South Alabama
Adam S. Goodie
Adam S. Goodie University of Georgia
Constantine Sedikides
Constantine Sedikides University of Southampton
James MacKillop
James MacKillop McMaster University
Brian J. Hoffman
Brian J. Hoffman University of Georgia
Joshua B. Grubbs
Joshua B. Grubbs Bowling Green State University
Eli J. Finkel
Eli J. Finkel Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens doors to diverse career paths in fields such as counseling, social work, and mental health services. Many professionals begin with an online psychology program before specializing in areas like social work, which often requires state-specific licensure and education.

For example, if you're interested in becoming a social worker in South Carolina, you'll need a degree accredited by the Council on Social Work Education and must complete supervised practice hours before applying for licensure. Similarly, South Dakota social work education requirements include specialized coursework and state exams.

Each state sets its own standards. For instance, Tennessee social work license requirements emphasize supervised clinical experience, while those interested in how to become a social worker in Texas need to meet extensive academic and fieldwork criteria.

Choosing an accredited online psychology degree is a flexible way to start your journey, but always review state-specific steps early to successfully transition from your studies to a fulfilling mental health or social work career.

Best Scientists Citing W. Keith Campbell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles