World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Eskild Petersen

Eskild Petersen

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
65
Citations
21131
World Ranking
8989
National Ranking
87

Eskild Petersen publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eskild Petersen sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 278 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Eskild Petersen D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eskild Petersen sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Eskild Petersen is affiliated with Aarhus University in Denmark and has a research focus that primarily spans areas within Medicine, particularly Infectious Diseases, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Epidemiology, Modeling and Simulation, and Surgery. Their work is characterized by a substantial number of publications that contribute to understanding infectious diseases and related public health challenges.

The scientist's recent notable papers include:

  • The continuing 2019-nCoV epidemic threat of novel coronaviruses to global health - The latest 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan, China (2020, International Journal of Infectious Diseases)
  • Comparing SARS-CoV-2 with SARS-CoV and influenza pandemics (2020, The Lancet Infectious Diseases)
  • COVID-19, SARS and MERS: are they closely related? (2020, Clinical Microbiology and Infection)
  • The WHO Global Tuberculosis 2021 Report - not so good news and turning the tide back to End TB (2022, International Journal of Infectious Diseases)
  • MDR/XDR-TB management of patients and contacts: Challenges facing the new decade. The 2020 clinical update by the Global Tuberculosis Network (2020, International Journal of Infectious Diseases)

The primary topics of research concentration encompass several areas connected to infectious diseases and epidemiological studies. These topics are:

  • Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
  • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
  • Bacillus and Francisella bacterial research
  • Poxvirus research and outbreaks

Throughout their career, Eskild Petersen has frequently collaborated with other researchers in the field. Notable frequent co-authors include:

  • Alimuddin Zumla
  • Lucille Blumberg
  • Shui Shan Lee
  • Seif Al-Abri
  • Francine Ntoumi

Their publications appear predominantly in journals specialized in infectious diseases and related fields. The main publication venues include:

  • International Journal of Infectious Diseases
  • Clinical Microbiology and Infection
  • IJID Regions
  • The Lancet Infectious Diseases
  • IJID One Health

Eskild Petersen's extensive body of research includes a strong emphasis on tuberculosis, coronaviruses, and other viral infections, supporting global efforts to address public health threats from epidemics and pandemics. Their contributions span clinical research, epidemiology, and public health perspectives.

Best Publications

  • The continuing 2019-nCoV epidemic threat of novel coronaviruses to global health - The latest 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan, China.

    David S. Hui;Esam Ei Azhar;Tariq A. Madani;Francine Ntoumi

  • Sources of toxoplasma infection in pregnant women: European multicentre case-control study

    A J C Cook;R E Gilbert;W Buffolano;J Zufferey

  • Comparing SARS-CoV-2 with SARS-CoV and influenza pandemics.

    Eskild Petersen;Eskild Petersen;Marion Koopmans;Unyeong Go;Davidson H Hamer

  • COVID-19, SARS and MERS: are they closely related?

    Nicola Petrosillo;Giulio Viceconte;Onder Ergonul;Giuseppe Ippolito

  • Human Monkeypox: Epidemiologic and Clinical Characteristics, Diagnosis, and Prevention.

    Eskild Petersen;Anu Kantele;Marion Koopmans;Danny Asogun

  • Rapid Spread of Zika Virus in The Americas - Implications for Public Health Preparedness for Mass Gatherings at the 2016 Brazil Olympic Games

    Eskild Petersen;Mary E. Wilson;Sok Touch;Brian McCloskey

  • Ocular Sequelae of Congenital Toxoplasmosis in Brazil Compared with Europe

    Ruth E. Gilbert;Katherine Freeman;Eleonor G. Lago;Lilian M. G. Bahia-Oliveira

  • Vaccines against toxoplasma gondii: challenges and opportunities

    Erik Jongert;Craig W Roberts;Nicola Gargano;Elisabeth Förster-Waldl

  • Prenatal treatment for serious neurological sequelae of congenital toxoplasmosis: an observational prospective cohort study.

    Mario Cortina-Borja;Hooi Kuan Tan;Martine Wallon;Malgorzata Paul

  • Strategy for Diagnosis of Congenital Toxoplasmosis: Evaluation of Methods Comparing Mothers and Newborns and Standard Methods for Postnatal Detection of Immunoglobulin G, M, and A Antibodies

    J. M. Pinon;H. Dumon;C. Chemla;J. Franck

  • Current status of Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever in the World Health Organization Eastern Mediterranean Region: issues, challenges, and future directions

    Seif S. Al-Abri;Idris Al Abaidani;Mehdi Fazlalipour;Ehsan Mostafavi

  • MDR/XDR-TB management of patients and contacts: challenges facing the new decade. The 2020 clinical update by the Global Tuberculosis Network.

    Giovanni Battista Migliori;Simon Tiberi;Simon Tiberi;Alimuddin Zumla;Eskild Petersen

  • Vaccines against Toxoplasma gondii: new developments and perspectives.

    Nian-Zhang Zhang;Jia Chen;Meng Wang;Eskild Petersen

  • Association between prenatal treatment and clinical manifestations of congenital toxoplasmosis in infancy: a cohort study in 13 European centres.

    Luuk Gras;Martine Wallon;Arnold Pollak;Mario Cortina-borja

  • Complete protection against lethal Toxoplasma gondii infection in mice immunized with a plasmid encoding the SAG1 gene.

    Henrik Vedel Nielsen;Sanne Lise Lauemøller;Lone Christiansen;Søren Buus

  • Management of imported malaria in Europe

    Helena H Askling;Helena H Askling;Fabrice Bruneel;Gerd Burchard;Francesco Castelli

  • Emergence of new SARS-CoV-2 Variant of Concern Omicron (B.1.1.529) - highlights Africa's research capabilities, but exposes major knowledge gaps, inequities of vaccine distribution, inadequacies in global COVID-19 response and control efforts

    Eskild Petersen;Francine Ntoumi;David S Hui;Aisha Abubakar

  • Monkeypox - Enhancing public health preparedness for an emerging lethal human zoonotic epidemic threat in the wake of the smallpox post-eradication era.

    Eskild Petersen;Ibrahim Abubakar;Chikwe Ihekweazu;David Heymann

  • Treatment delay affects clinical severity of tuberculosis: a longitudinal cohort study

    Jakob Virenfeldt;F. Rudolf;C. Camara;A. Furtado

  • Genetic and epigenetic factors at COL2A1 and ABCA4 influence clinical outcome in congenital toxoplasmosis.

    Sarra E. Jamieson;Lee-Anne de Roubaix;Mario Cortina-Borja;Hooi Kuan Tan

Frequent Co-Authors

Alimuddin Zumla
Alimuddin Zumla University College London
Ziad A. Memish
Ziad A. Memish Emory University
Markus Maeurer
Markus Maeurer Champalimaud Foundation
Esam I. Azhar
Esam I. Azhar King Abdulaziz University
Giuseppe Ippolito
Giuseppe Ippolito Istituto Nazionale per le Malattie Infettive Lazzaro Spallanzani
Xing-Quan Zhu
Xing-Quan Zhu Shanxi Agricultural University
Timothy D. McHugh
Timothy D. McHugh University College London
Giovanni Battista Migliori
Giovanni Battista Migliori Queen Mary University of London
Ben J. Marais
Ben J. Marais University of Sydney
David S.C. Hui
David S.C. Hui Chinese University of Hong Kong

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry opens doors to a range of innovative healthcare careers. In today’s digital world, many of these future-driven careers can be accessed by earning degrees and certifications fully online.

For those interested in the administrative side of healthcare, medical coding jobs salary is an important consideration. Medical coders play a vital role in health information systems, translating patient data into standardized codes for billing and insurance. The job outlook for medical billing and coding continues to be strong, with steady demand in hospitals, clinics, and insurance organizations.

If you’re looking to advance into management, a health information management degree online can help you lead in data-driven healthcare environments. Alternatively, those passionate about diet and wellness might explore the cheapest online nutrition degree options to enter or advance in the growing field of nutrition.

These flexible online study paths allow you to match your scientific training with real-world, in-demand careers across the health sector.

Best Scientists Citing Eskild Petersen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles