World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 41 1546 1445 659 601 145 12520
Economics and Finance 41 2134 1928 1231 1085 141 12518

Linda A. Myers publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Linda A. Myers between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Linda A. Myers published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 5.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2015. 9 of the 154 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2015. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 0 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 5 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 5 publications
1999 2025

154 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Linda A. Myers: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 1
2001 1
2002 2
2003 4
2004 1
2005 0
2006 1
2007 5
2008 5
2009 6
2010 6
2011 8
2012 8
2013 11
2014 8
2015 15
2016 7
2017 13
2018 3
2019 10
2020 7
2021 8
2022 7
2023 7
2024 4
2025 5
Total 154
Download as CSV

Linda A. Myers publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda A. Myers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 145–149 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 145 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81 145
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Linda A. Myers D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda A. Myers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97 41
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Linda A. Myers is affiliated with the University of Tennessee at Knoxville in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the domain of Business, Management and Accounting, with a significant focus on Accounting. Their work spans several subfields including Strategy and Management, Finance, Management Information Systems, and Economics and Econometrics.

The main topics covered by their research include:

  • Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
  • Corporate Finance and Governance
  • Financial Reporting and Valuation Research
  • Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
  • Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
  • Private Equity and Venture Capital
  • Accounting and Organizational Management

Myers has published extensively, with a notable presence in several academic venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Accounting Horizons
  • Contemporary Accounting Research
  • The Accounting Review
  • Journal of Accounting Auditing & Finance

Recent papers illustrate diverse research interests with publications in well-regarded journals. These include:

  • "The Effect of Media Competition on Analyst Forecast Properties: Cross-Country Evidence," 2020, Journal of Accounting Auditing & Finance
  • "Improving Earnings Predictions and Abnormal Returns with Machine Learning," 2021, Accounting Horizons
  • "Does Venture Capital Backing Improve Disclosure Controls and Procedures? Evidence from Management's Post-IPO Disclosures," 2022, Journal of Business Ethics
  • "The Impact of Managerial Discretion in Revenue Recognition: A Reexamination," 2022, Contemporary Accounting Research
  • "Customer referencing and capital market benefits: Evidence from the cost of equity," 2023, Contemporary Accounting Research

Their collaborations include frequent co-authorship with:

  • Roy Schmardebeck
  • Jason Bangert
  • James N. Myers
  • Lixin Su
  • Ying Cao

The scientist's research interests reveal a blend of empirical and theoretical approaches, focusing on critical aspects of accounting practices, corporate governance, and market efficiency. Their work addresses issues such as earnings management, disclosure controls, and the intersection of machine learning with financial predictions.

Best Publications

  • Exploring the Term of the Auditor‐Client Relationship and the Quality of Earnings: A Case for Mandatory Auditor Rotation?

    James N. Myers;Linda A. Myers;Thomas C. Omer

  • Earnings Momentum and Earnings Management

    James N. Myers;Linda A. Myers;Douglas J. Skinner

  • Market reactions to the disclosure of internal control weaknesses and to the characteristics of those weaknesses under section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002

    Jacqueline S. Hammersley;Linda A. Myers;Catherine Shakespeare

  • Bringing the Future Forward: The Effect of Disclosure on the Returns‐Earnings Relation

    Russell Lundholm;Linda A. Myers

  • Fair value accounting and gains from asset securitizations: A convenient earnings management tool with compensation side-benefits

    Patricia M. Dechow;Linda A. Myers;Catherine Shakespeare

  • Home Country Tax System Characteristics and Corporate Tax Avoidance: International Evidence

    T. J. Atwood;Michael S. Drake;James N. Myers;Linda A. Myers

  • Does Company Reputation Matter for Financial Reporting Quality? Evidence from Restatements*

    Ying Cao;Linda A. Myers;Thomas C. Omer

  • Book-tax conformity, earnings persistence and the association between earnings and future cash flows ☆

    T.J. Atwood;Michael S. Drake;Linda A. Myers

  • Do Individual Investors Cause Post-Earnings Announcement Drift? Direct Evidence from Personal Trades

    David A. Hirshleifer;James N. Myers;Linda A. Myers;Siew Hong Teoh

  • Reviewing the SEC's Review Process: 10-K Comment Letters and the Cost of Remediation

    Cory A. Cassell;Lauren M. Dreher;Linda A. Myers

  • A re-examination of analysts' superiority over time-series forecasts of annual earnings

    Mark T. Bradshaw;Michael S. Drake;James N. Myers;Linda A. Myers

  • Company reputation and the cost of equity capital

    Ying Cao;James N. Myers;Linda A. Myers;Thomas C. Omer

  • Financial Statement Comparability and the Informativeness of Stock Prices About Future Earnings

    Jong-Hag Choi;Sun Hwa Choi;Linda A. Myers;David Ziebart

  • The effects of audit partner pre-client and client-specific experience on audit quality and on perceptions of audit quality

    Wuchun Chi;Linda A. Myers;Thomas C. Omer;Hong Xie

  • Do earnings reported under IFRS tell us more about future earnings and cash flows

    T.J. Atwood;Michael S. Drake;James N. Myers;Linda A. Myers

  • The Failure to Remediate Previously Disclosed Material Weaknesses in Internal Controls

    Jacqueline S. Hammersley;Linda A. Myers;Jian Zhou

  • Earnings Momentum and Earnings Management

    James N. Myers;Linda A. Myers;Douglas J. Skinner

  • Small Audit Firm Membership in Associations, Networks, and Alliances: Implications for Audit Quality and Audit Fees

    Kenneth L. Bills;Lauren M. Cunningham;Linda A. Myers

  • Exploring the Term of the Auditor-Client Relationship and the Quality of Earnings: A Case for Mandatory Auditor Rotation?

    James N. Myers;Linda A. Myers;Thomas C. Omer

  • Disclosure Quality and the Mispricing of Accruals and Cash Flow

    Michael S. Drake;James N. Myers;Linda A. Myers

  • Do management EPS forecasts allow returns to reflect future earnings? Implications for the continuation of management’s quarterly earnings guidance

    Jong-Hag Choi;Linda A. Myers;Yoonseok Zang;David A. Ziebart

  • Management forecasts and the cost of equity capital: international evidence

    Ying Cao;Linda A. Myers;Albert Tsang;Yong George Yang

  • Does Audit Committee Accounting Expertise Help to Promote Audit Quality? Evidence from Auditor Reporting of Internal Control Weaknesses

    Ling Lei Lisic;Linda A. Myers;Timothy A. Seidel;Jian Zhou

  • Reviewing the SEC’s Review Process: 10-K Comment Letters and the Cost of Remediation

    Cory A. Cassell;Lauren M. Cunningham;Linda A. Myers

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas C. Omer
Thomas C. Omer University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Michael S. Drake
Michael S. Drake Brigham Young University
David A. Hirshleifer
David A. Hirshleifer University of Southern California
Siew Hong Teoh
Siew Hong Teoh University of California, Los Angeles
Albert H.C. Tsang
Albert H.C. Tsang Southern University of Science and Technology
Nathan Y. Sharp
Nathan Y. Sharp Texas A&M University
Douglas J. Skinner
Douglas J. Skinner University of Chicago
Russell J. Lundholm
Russell J. Lundholm University of British Columbia
Mark Thomas Bradshaw
Mark Thomas Bradshaw Boston College
Douglas J. Cumming
Douglas J. Cumming Stevens Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Economics and Finance in the USA opens doors to diverse online degrees and flexible career opportunities. If you want to deepen your analytical skills, consider pursuing an online masters in business intelligence, which equips you with advanced tools to interpret financial data and drive business strategy.

For those aiming for leadership or management roles, enrolling in a flexible mba no gmat program allows you to balance education with your professional life while skipping standardized tests. There are also several top online mba under 29k options for students who need to manage costs without sacrificing quality.

Careers in digital marketing are also evolving alongside finance and economics. Earning an online marketing bachelor’s degree blends creative and analytical skills, which are increasingly valuable across banking, fintech, and corporate sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Linda A. Myers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles