World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Business and Management

D-Index
64
Citations
34959
World Ranking
411
National Ranking
193

Economics and Finance

D-Index
64
Citations
34978
World Ranking
622
National Ranking
398

Mary E. Barth publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary E. Barth sits on this spectrum.

35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientists 435 publications: 1 scientists 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35 publications 436+

This scientist: 158 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

Mary E. Barth D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary E. Barth sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mary E. Barth is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Business, Management and Accounting as well as Economics, Econometrics and Finance. The subfields of study they have contributed to include Accounting, Strategy and Management, Finance, Management Information Systems, and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance.

Their academic work focuses on multiple research topics such as Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance, Financial Reporting and Valuation Research, Financial Markets and Investment Strategies, Corporate Finance and Governance, Accounting and Organizational Management, Financial Reporting and XBRL, and Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting.

Mary E. Barth has published in a variety of scholarly venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • The Accounting Review
  • Journal of Accounting and Economics
  • Accounting and Business Research
  • Journal of International Accounting Research

Their recent and notable papers include the following publications:

  • "Evolution in Value Relevance of Accounting Information," 2022, The Accounting Review
  • "Accounting standards: the 'too difficult' box - the next big accounting issue?", 2022, Accounting and Business Research
  • "Accounting and innovation: Paths forward for research," 2024, Journal of Accounting and Economics
  • "Does Voluntary Disclosure Substitute for Mandatory Disclosure? Evidence from Contract Redactions," 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal
  • "Auditor reporting to bank regulators: Effective regulation or regulatory overreach?", 2021, Journal of Accounting and Economics

Mary E. Barth collaborates often with a group of coauthors, including Wayne R. Landsman, Kurt H. Gee, Doron Israeli, Ken Li, and Charles McClure, with multiple joint publications appearing across their work.

Best Publications

  • International Accounting Standards and Accounting Quality

    Mary E. Barth;Wayne R. Landsman;Mark H. Lang

  • The relevance of the value relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting: another view $

    Mary E Barth;William H Beaver;Wayne R Landsman

  • Accruals and the Prediction of Future Cash Flows

    Mary E. Barth;Donald P. Cram;Karen K. Nelson

  • Analyst Coverage and Intangible Assets

    Mary E. Barth;Ron Kasznik;Maureen F. McNichols

  • Relative valuation roles of equity book value and net income as a function of financial health

    Mary E Barth;William H Beaver;Wayne R Landsman

  • Market rewards associated with patterns of increasing earnings

    Mary E. Barth;John A. Elliott;Mark W. Finn

  • Revalued financial, tangible, and intangible assets: Associations with share prices and non-market-based value estimates

    Mary E. Barth;Greg Clinch

  • Are IFRS-based and US GAAP-based accounting amounts comparable? $

    Mary E. Barth;Wayne R. Landsman;Mark Lang;Christopher Williams

  • Brand Values and Capital Market Valuation

    Mary E. Barth;Michael B. Clement;George Foster;Ron Kasznik

  • FAIR VALUE ACCOUNTING: EVIDENCE FROM INVESTMENT SECURITIES AND THE MARKET VALUATION OF BANKS

    M E Barth

  • Market Reaction to the Adoption of IFRS in Europe

    Unknown

  • Revaluations of fixed assets and future firm performance: Evidence from the UK

    David Aboody;Mary E. Barth;Ron Kasznik

  • Cost of capital and earnings transparency

    Mary E. Barth;Yaniv Konchitchki;Wayne R. Landsman

  • The Effects of Cross‐Sectional Scale Differences on Regression Results in Empirical Accounting Research*

    Mary E. Barth;Sanjay Kallapur

  • Scale Effects in Capital Markets‐Based Accounting Research

    Mary E. Barth;Greg Clinch

  • Accruals, Cash Flows, and Equity Values

    Mary E. Barth;William H. Beaver;John R. M. Hand;Wayne R. Landsman

  • Value-relevance of banks' fair value disclosures under SFAS no. 107

    Mary E. Barth;William H. Beaver;Wayne R. Landsman

  • Fair value accounting: Effects on banks' earnings volatility, regulatory capital, and value of contractual cash flows

    Mary E. Barth;Wayne R. Landsman;James M. Wahlen

  • Value-Relevance of Banks' Fair Value Disclosures Under SFAS No. 107

    Mary E. Barth;William H. Beaver;Wayne R. Landsman

  • Estimation and Market Valuation of Environmental Liabilities Relating to Superfund Sites

    Mary E. Barth;Maureen F. McNichols

  • The economic consequences associated with integrated report quality: Capital market and real effects

    Mary E. Barth;Steven F. Cahan;Li Chen;Elmar R. Venter

  • How did Financial Reporting Contribute to the Financial Crisis

    Mary E. Barth;Wayne R. Landsman

  • International Accounting Standards and Accounting Quality

    Mary E. Barth;Wayne R. Landsman;Mark H. Lang

  • The Relevance of the Value Relevance Literature For Financial Accounting Standard Setting: Another View

    Mary E. Barth;William H. Beaver;Wayne R. Landsman

Frequent Co-Authors

Wayne R. Landsman
Wayne R. Landsman University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
William H. Beaver
William H. Beaver Stanford University
Mark H. Lang
Mark H. Lang University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Steven F. Cahan
Steven F. Cahan University of Auckland
Maureen F. McNichols
Maureen F. McNichols Stanford University
Christopher Nobes
Christopher Nobes Royal Holloway University of London
Baruch Lev
Baruch Lev New York University
Anne Beatty
Anne Beatty The Ohio State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Economics and Finance opens doors to various interdisciplinary career opportunities. Professionals in these fields often enhance their skillsets with targeted online degrees that align with rapidly evolving industry needs.

For those seeking a foundational route, online associate degrees in office administration can be a stepping stone to administrative roles in finance, budgeting, or operations.

At the graduate level, finance professionals may broaden their prospects through a online hr masters to enter human capital management or recruitment within financial institutions. For those drawn to numbers and forecasting, enrolling in an online data analytics masters prepares practitioners for data-driven roles in market analysis and financial modeling.

Leadership positions often require advanced management skills. The best organizational leadership master's programs help students develop expertise in effective leadership and strategic decision-making—critical for those aiming for upper management or executive roles within the finance and economics sector.

These flexible online degree options allow both aspiring and experienced professionals to specialize and adapt to the dynamic demands of the global economy.

Best Scientists Citing Mary E. Barth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles