World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 64 411 381 193 176 158 34959
Economics and Finance 64 622 561 398 351 159 34978

Mary E. Barth publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mary E. Barth between 1977 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mary E. Barth published across 49 years, from 1977 to 2025, averaging 3.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2017. 7 of the 170 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1977 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2017. 1977: 1 publication 1978: 3 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 3 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 10 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 8 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 6 publications 2025: 1 publication
1977 2025

170 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mary E. Barth: publications per year, 1977 to 2025
Year Publications
1977 1
1978 3
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 1
1990 1
1991 0
1992 2
1993 1
1994 3
1995 5
1996 6
1997 0
1998 6
1999 8
2000 4
2001 7
2002 1
2003 10
2004 3
2005 1
2006 8
2007 5
2008 6
2009 4
2010 5
2011 3
2012 4
2013 9
2014 7
2015 5
2016 2
2017 12
2018 9
2019 6
2020 7
2021 5
2022 2
2023 1
2024 6
2025 1
Total 170
Download as CSV

Mary E. Barth publications per year - data summary

  • Mary E. Barth, a Business and Management scholar from Stanford University, has 170 publications recorded across 49 years, from 1977 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1977 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2017, with 12 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1977, 1989, 1990, 1993 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 12 of the 49 years in the span carry no publications at all (1979, 1980, 1981, 1982 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 3.5 papers per year over the whole span, or 4.6 per year counting only the 37 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 15 publications, 9% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1977-1993: 9 publications (0.5 per year); 1994-2010: 82 publications (4.8 per year); 2011-2025: 79 publications (5.3 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Mary E. Barth publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary E. Barth sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 155–159 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 158 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50 158
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Mary E. Barth publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 3,017 Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 82 ranges running from 35–39 to 436+ publications.
  • Mary E. Barth, a Business and Management scholar from Stanford University, records 158 publications - the 61st percentile of the discipline.
  • 61% of ranked Business and Management scientists score the same or lower than Mary E. Barth, and about 39% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 135–139 publications range, and Mary E. Barth ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 95–99 publications, holding 122 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 52% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 135–139 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 436 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Mary E. Barth D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary E. Barth sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 64 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22 64
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Mary E. Barth D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 3,017 Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 60 ranges running from 30 to 89+ D-Index.
  • Mary E. Barth, a Business and Management scholar from Stanford University, records 64 D-Index - the 87th percentile of the discipline.
  • 87% of ranked Business and Management scientists score the same or lower than Mary E. Barth, and about 13% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 42 D-Index range, and Mary E. Barth ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32 D-Index, holding 171 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 44 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more, 96 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Overview

Mary E. Barth is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Business, Management and Accounting as well as Economics, Econometrics and Finance. The subfields of study they have contributed to include Accounting, Strategy and Management, Finance, Management Information Systems, and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance.

Their academic work focuses on multiple research topics such as Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance, Financial Reporting and Valuation Research, Financial Markets and Investment Strategies, Corporate Finance and Governance, Accounting and Organizational Management, Financial Reporting and XBRL, and Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting.

Mary E. Barth has published in a variety of scholarly venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • The Accounting Review
  • Journal of Accounting and Economics
  • Accounting and Business Research
  • Journal of International Accounting Research

Their recent and notable papers include the following publications:

  • "Evolution in Value Relevance of Accounting Information," 2022, The Accounting Review
  • "Accounting standards: the 'too difficult' box - the next big accounting issue?", 2022, Accounting and Business Research
  • "Accounting and innovation: Paths forward for research," 2024, Journal of Accounting and Economics
  • "Does Voluntary Disclosure Substitute for Mandatory Disclosure? Evidence from Contract Redactions," 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal
  • "Auditor reporting to bank regulators: Effective regulation or regulatory overreach?", 2021, Journal of Accounting and Economics

Mary E. Barth collaborates often with a group of coauthors, including Wayne R. Landsman, Kurt H. Gee, Doron Israeli, Ken Li, and Charles McClure, with multiple joint publications appearing across their work.

Best Publications

  • International Accounting Standards and Accounting Quality

    Mary E. Barth;Wayne R. Landsman;Mark H. Lang

  • The relevance of the value relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting: another view $

    Mary E Barth;William H Beaver;Wayne R Landsman

  • Accruals and the Prediction of Future Cash Flows

    Mary E. Barth;Donald P. Cram;Karen K. Nelson

  • Analyst Coverage and Intangible Assets

    Mary E. Barth;Ron Kasznik;Maureen F. McNichols

  • Relative valuation roles of equity book value and net income as a function of financial health

    Mary E Barth;William H Beaver;Wayne R Landsman

  • Market rewards associated with patterns of increasing earnings

    Mary E. Barth;John A. Elliott;Mark W. Finn

  • Revalued financial, tangible, and intangible assets: Associations with share prices and non-market-based value estimates

    Mary E. Barth;Greg Clinch

  • Are IFRS-based and US GAAP-based accounting amounts comparable? $

    Mary E. Barth;Wayne R. Landsman;Mark Lang;Christopher Williams

  • Brand Values and Capital Market Valuation

    Mary E. Barth;Michael B. Clement;George Foster;Ron Kasznik

  • FAIR VALUE ACCOUNTING: EVIDENCE FROM INVESTMENT SECURITIES AND THE MARKET VALUATION OF BANKS

    M E Barth

  • Market Reaction to the Adoption of IFRS in Europe

    Unknown

  • Revaluations of fixed assets and future firm performance: Evidence from the UK

    David Aboody;Mary E. Barth;Ron Kasznik

  • Cost of capital and earnings transparency

    Mary E. Barth;Yaniv Konchitchki;Wayne R. Landsman

  • The Effects of Cross‐Sectional Scale Differences on Regression Results in Empirical Accounting Research*

    Mary E. Barth;Sanjay Kallapur

  • Scale Effects in Capital Markets‐Based Accounting Research

    Mary E. Barth;Greg Clinch

  • Accruals, Cash Flows, and Equity Values

    Mary E. Barth;William H. Beaver;John R. M. Hand;Wayne R. Landsman

  • Value-relevance of banks' fair value disclosures under SFAS no. 107

    Mary E. Barth;William H. Beaver;Wayne R. Landsman

  • Fair value accounting: Effects on banks' earnings volatility, regulatory capital, and value of contractual cash flows

    Mary E. Barth;Wayne R. Landsman;James M. Wahlen

  • Value-Relevance of Banks' Fair Value Disclosures Under SFAS No. 107

    Mary E. Barth;William H. Beaver;Wayne R. Landsman

  • Estimation and Market Valuation of Environmental Liabilities Relating to Superfund Sites

    Mary E. Barth;Maureen F. McNichols

  • The economic consequences associated with integrated report quality: Capital market and real effects

    Mary E. Barth;Steven F. Cahan;Li Chen;Elmar R. Venter

  • How did Financial Reporting Contribute to the Financial Crisis

    Mary E. Barth;Wayne R. Landsman

  • International Accounting Standards and Accounting Quality

    Mary E. Barth;Wayne R. Landsman;Mark H. Lang

  • The Relevance of the Value Relevance Literature For Financial Accounting Standard Setting: Another View

    Mary E. Barth;William H. Beaver;Wayne R. Landsman

Frequent Co-Authors

Wayne R. Landsman
Wayne R. Landsman University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
William H. Beaver
William H. Beaver Stanford University
Mark H. Lang
Mark H. Lang University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Steven F. Cahan
Steven F. Cahan University of Auckland
Maureen F. McNichols
Maureen F. McNichols Stanford University
Christopher Nobes
Christopher Nobes Royal Holloway University of London
Baruch Lev
Baruch Lev New York University
Anne Beatty
Anne Beatty The Ohio State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Economics and Finance opens doors to various interdisciplinary career opportunities. Professionals in these fields often enhance their skillsets with targeted online degrees that align with rapidly evolving industry needs.

For those seeking a foundational route, online associate degrees in office administration can be a stepping stone to administrative roles in finance, budgeting, or operations.

At the graduate level, finance professionals may broaden their prospects through a online hr masters to enter human capital management or recruitment within financial institutions. For those drawn to numbers and forecasting, enrolling in an online data analytics masters prepares practitioners for data-driven roles in market analysis and financial modeling.

Leadership positions often require advanced management skills. The best organizational leadership master's programs help students develop expertise in effective leadership and strategic decision-making—critical for those aiming for upper management or executive roles within the finance and economics sector.

These flexible online degree options allow both aspiring and experienced professionals to specialize and adapt to the dynamic demands of the global economy.

Best Scientists Citing Mary E. Barth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles