World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Business and Management

D-Index
48
Citations
32123
World Ranking
1071
National Ranking
467

Economics and Finance

D-Index
48
Citations
32123
World Ranking
1467
National Ranking
885

Mark H. Lang publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark H. Lang sits on this spectrum.

35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 115 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientists 435 publications: 1 scientists 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35 publications 436+

This scientist: 99 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

Mark H. Lang D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark H. Lang sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 67 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark H. Lang is affiliated with the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields within business, economics, and accounting, with a substantial focus on corporate finance, governance, and innovation.

The primary fields of study covered by Mark H. Lang include Business, Management and Accounting, and Economics, Econometrics and Finance.

The subfields of study they contribute to are Accounting, Finance, Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management, and Sociology and Political Science.

The main research topics addressed in their work include:

  • Corporate Finance and Governance
  • Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
  • Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
  • Innovation Policy and R&D
  • Intellectual Property and Patents
  • Media Influence and Politics
  • Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis

Mark H. Lang has published frequently in several academic venues, with the most notable being the SSRN Electronic Journal and the Journal of Accounting and Economics. Other publication venues include Management Science, Journal of Accounting Research, and Journal of Financial Economics.

Some of the recent papers featuring their research are:

  • Regulatory cooperation and foreign portfolio investment, 2020, Journal of Financial Economics
  • MiFID II unbundling and sell-side analyst research, 2023, Journal of Accounting and Economics

Other influential papers related to their areas of co-authors or thematic proximity include:

  • Measuring innovation and navigating its unique information issues: A review of the accounting literature on innovation, 2024, Journal of Accounting and Economics
  • Reproducibility in Accounting Research: Views of the Research Community, 2020, Journal of Accounting Research
  • The effect of patent disclosure quality on innovation, 2023, Journal of Accounting and Economics

Mark H. Lang has collaborated frequently with other researchers. Notable co-authors include Stephen Glaeser, Travis Dyer, James D. Omartian, Luzi Hail, and Christian Leuz.

Best Publications

  • International Accounting Standards and Accounting Quality

    Mary E. Barth;Wayne R. Landsman;Mark H. Lang

  • CROSS- SECTIONAL DETERMINANTS OF ANALYST RATINGS OF CORPORATE DISCLOSURES

    Mark Lang;Russell Lundholm

  • Corporate Disclosure Policy and Analyst Behavior

    Mark H. Lang;Russell J. Lundholm

  • ADRs, Analysts, and Accuracy: Does Cross Listing in the United States Improve a Firm's Information Environment and Increase Market Value?

    Mark H. Lang;Karl V. Lins;Darius P. Miller

  • Voluntary Disclosure and Equity Offerings: Reducing Information Asymmetry or Hyping the Stock?*

    Mark H. Lang;Russell J. Lundholm

  • Earnings management and cross listing: Are reconciled earnings comparable to US earnings?

    Mark H. Lang;Jana Smith Raedy;Wendy M. Wilson

  • Are IFRS-based and US GAAP-based accounting amounts comparable? $

    Mary E. Barth;Wayne R. Landsman;Mark Lang;Christopher Williams

  • Transparency, Liquidity, and Valuation: International Evidence on When Transparency Matters Most

    Mark Lang;Karl V. Lins;Mark Maffett

  • How Representative Are Firms That Are Cross‐Listed in the United States? An Analysis of Accounting Quality

    Mark Lang;Jana Smith Raedy;Michelle Higgins Yetman

  • Concentrated Control, Analyst Following, and Valuation: Do Analysts Matter Most When Investors Are Protected Least?

    Mark H. Lang;Karl V. Lins;Darius P. Miller

  • Psychological Factors and Stock Option Exercise

    Chip Heath;Steven Huddart;Mark Lang

  • Employee stock option exercises an empirical analysis

    Steven Huddart;Mark Lang

  • THE VALUE RELEVANCE OF GERMAN ACCOUNTING MEASURES: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS

    T S Harris;M Lang;H Peter

  • The evolution of 10-K textual disclosure: Evidence from Latent Dirichlet Allocation

    Travis Dyer;Mark Lang;Lorien Stice-Lawrence

  • The Effects of Accounting Diversity: Evidence from the European Union

    Peter Joos;Mark Lang

  • International Accounting Standards and Accounting Quality

    Mary E. Barth;Wayne R. Landsman;Mark H. Lang

  • Transparency and liquidity uncertainty in crisis periods

    Mark Lang;Mark Maffett

  • Textual analysis and international financial reporting: Large sample evidence ☆

    Mark Lang;Lorien Stice-Lawrence

  • ADRs, Analysts, and Accuracy: Does Cross Listing in the U.S. Improve a Firm's Information Environment and Increase Market Value?

    Mark H. Lang;Karl V. Lins;Darius P. Miller

  • CFO Narcissism and Financial Reporting Quality: CFO NARCISSISM AND FINANCIAL REPORTING QUALITY

    Charles Ham;Mark Lang;Nicholas Seybert;Sean Wang

  • Do Analysts Matter Most When Investors are Protected Least

    Mark H. Lang;Karl V. Lins;David Eccles;Darius P. Miller

Frequent Co-Authors

Douglas A. Shackelford
Douglas A. Shackelford University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Wayne R. Landsman
Wayne R. Landsman University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Karl V. Lins
Karl V. Lins University of Utah
Mary E. Barth
Mary E. Barth Stanford University
Russell J. Lundholm
Russell J. Lundholm University of British Columbia
John R. Graham
John R. Graham Duke University
Stephen H. Penman
Stephen H. Penman Columbia University
Christian Leuz
Christian Leuz University of Chicago
Edward L. Maydew
Edward L. Maydew University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Murillo Campello
Murillo Campello University of Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Economics and Finance can open doors to a variety of career pathways. Many students and working professionals now prefer flexible learning, and online degrees make it easier to advance your education while balancing other commitments.

For those aiming for leadership roles, fast track mba programs provide a quick route to earning a respected credential and entering management positions. Those interested in finance basics may consider best online bookkeeping certificate programs, which are ideal for learning core accounting and financial recordkeeping skills in a short period.

If you are looking for a foundational business education, an associate degree office management can help you qualify for various administrative positions and provide a solid base to pursue further studies.

Lastly, with people being a company’s greatest asset, a masters in hr online can prepare you for advanced roles in recruitment, employee relations, and organizational strategy.

Best Scientists Citing Mark H. Lang

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles