World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 52 847 789 367 335 158 25667
Economics and Finance 52 1217 1082 730 633 160 25665

Wayne R. Landsman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Wayne R. Landsman between 1981 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Wayne R. Landsman published across 45 years, from 1981 to 2025, averaging 3.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2017. 12 of the 165 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2017. 1981: 1 publication 1982: 1 publication 1983: 2 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 4 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 5 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 2 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 7 publications
1981 2025

165 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Wayne R. Landsman: publications per year, 1981 to 2025
Year Publications
1981 1
1982 1
1983 2
1984 2
1985 1
1986 1
1987 0
1988 1
1989 4
1990 1
1991 0
1992 1
1993 1
1994 0
1995 3
1996 2
1997 0
1998 3
1999 4
2000 1
2001 5
2002 7
2003 2
2004 4
2005 3
2006 7
2007 6
2008 5
2009 2
2010 9
2011 6
2012 5
2013 4
2014 3
2015 1
2016 2
2017 14
2018 7
2019 5
2020 4
2021 10
2022 8
2023 5
2024 5
2025 7
Total 165
Download as CSV

Wayne R. Landsman publications per year - data summary

  • Wayne R. Landsman, a Business and Management scholar from University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, has 165 publications recorded across 45 years, from 1981 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1981 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2017, with 14 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1981, 1982, 1985, 1986 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 4 of the 45 years in the span carry no publications at all (1987, 1991, 1994 and 1997).
  • The rate of publication averages 3.7 papers per year over the whole span, or 4.0 per year counting only the 41 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 35 publications, 21% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1981-1995: 19 publications (1.3 per year); 1996-2010: 60 publications (4.0 per year); 2011-2025: 86 publications (5.7 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Wayne R. Landsman publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wayne R. Landsman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 155–159 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 158 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50 158
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Wayne R. Landsman publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 3,017 Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 82 ranges running from 35–39 to 436+ publications.
  • Wayne R. Landsman, a Business and Management scholar from University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, records 158 publications - the 61st percentile of the discipline.
  • 61% of ranked Business and Management scientists score the same or lower than Wayne R. Landsman, and about 39% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 135–139 publications range, and Wayne R. Landsman ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 95–99 publications, holding 122 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 52% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 135–139 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 436 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Wayne R. Landsman D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wayne R. Landsman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54 52
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Wayne R. Landsman D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 3,017 Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 60 ranges running from 30 to 89+ D-Index.
  • Wayne R. Landsman, a Business and Management scholar from University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, records 52 D-Index - the 72nd percentile of the discipline.
  • 72% of ranked Business and Management scientists score the same or lower than Wayne R. Landsman, and about 28% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 42 D-Index range, and Wayne R. Landsman ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32 D-Index, holding 171 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 44 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more, 96 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Overview

Wayne R. Landsman is affiliated with the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on areas within business, management, accounting, economics, econometrics, and finance. The scientist's work spans multiple subfields including accounting, finance, economics and econometrics, strategy and management, and information systems.

Their output includes numerous publications, with a strong presence in key academic venues. Frequent publication venues for Wayne R. Landsman include:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • The Accounting Review
  • Management Science
  • Journal of Accounting and Economics
  • European Accounting Review

The scientist's research topics cover a range of issues in auditing, earnings management, governance, corporate finance, governance, financial markets and investment strategies, banking stability, regulation, and efficiency. Additional areas of interest include credit risk and financial regulations, financial reporting and valuation research, and financial distress and bankruptcy prediction.

  • Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
  • Corporate Finance and Governance
  • Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
  • Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
  • Credit Risk and Financial Regulations
  • Financial Reporting and Valuation Research
  • Financial Distress and Bankruptcy Prediction

Wayne R. Landsman has collaborated frequently with several researchers. Notable frequent co-authors include:

  • Jianxin Zhao
  • Mary E. Barth
  • Zihang Ryan Peng
  • Petrus Ferreira
  • Edward L. Maydew

Some recent publications by the scientist include:

  • "Deterrent Disclosure," 2021, The Accounting Review
  • "The Revolving Door between Large Audit Firms and the PCAOB: Implications for Future Inspection Reports and Audit Quality," 2021, The Accounting Review
  • "Tax-Loss Harvesting with Cryptocurrencies," 2022, SSRN Electronic Journal
  • "Effect of Mandatory IFRS Adoption on Accounting-Based Prediction Models for CDS Spreads," 2020, European Accounting Review
  • "CDS Trading Initiation, Information Asymmetry, and Dividend Payout," 2022, Management Science

Best Publications

  • International Accounting Standards and Accounting Quality

    Mary E. Barth;Wayne R. Landsman;Mark H. Lang

  • The relevance of the value relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting: another view $

    Mary E Barth;William H Beaver;Wayne R Landsman

  • Relative valuation roles of equity book value and net income as a function of financial health

    Mary E Barth;William H Beaver;Wayne R Landsman

  • Are IFRS-based and US GAAP-based accounting amounts comparable? $

    Mary E. Barth;Wayne R. Landsman;Mark Lang;Christopher Williams

  • Auditors' Perceived Business Risk and Audit Fees: Analysis and Evidence

    Timothy B. Bell;Wayne R. Landsman;Douglas A. Shackelford

  • The information content of annual earnings announcements and mandatory adoption of IFRS

    Wayne R. Landsman;Edward L. Maydew;Jacob R. Thornock

  • Cost of capital and earnings transparency

    Mary E. Barth;Yaniv Konchitchki;Wayne R. Landsman

  • Accruals, Cash Flows, and Equity Values

    Mary E. Barth;William H. Beaver;John R. M. Hand;Wayne R. Landsman

  • Value-relevance of banks' fair value disclosures under SFAS no. 107

    Mary E. Barth;William H. Beaver;Wayne R. Landsman

  • Has the Information Content of Quarterly Earnings Announcements Declined in the Past Three Decades

    Wayne R. Landsman;Edward L. Maydew

  • Fair value accounting: Effects on banks' earnings volatility, regulatory capital, and value of contractual cash flows

    Mary E. Barth;Wayne R. Landsman;James M. Wahlen

  • Value-Relevance of Banks' Fair Value Disclosures Under SFAS No. 107

    Mary E. Barth;William H. Beaver;Wayne R. Landsman

  • Is fair value accounting information relevant and reliable? Evidence from capital market research

    Wayne R. Landsman

  • How did Financial Reporting Contribute to the Financial Crisis

    Mary E. Barth;Wayne R. Landsman

  • AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF PENSION FUND PROPERTY RIGHTS

    W Landsman

  • International Accounting Standards and Accounting Quality

    Mary E. Barth;Wayne R. Landsman;Mark H. Lang

  • Do Managerial Incentives Drive Cost Behavior? Evidence about the Role of the Zero Earnings Benchmark for Labor Cost Behavior in Private Belgian Firms

    Bart Dierynck;Wayne R. Landsman;Annelies Renders

  • The Relevance of the Value Relevance Literature For Financial Accounting Standard Setting: Another View

    Mary E. Barth;William H. Beaver;Wayne R. Landsman

  • The market valuation implications of net periodic pension cost components

    Mary E Barth;William H Beaver;Wayne R Landsman

  • Auditor Switches in the Pre‐ and Post‐Enron Eras: Risk or Realignment?

    Wayne R. Landsman;Karen K. Nelson;Brian R. Rountree

  • When Is Bad News Really Bad News

    Jennifer Conrad;Bradford Cornell;Wayne R. Landsman

  • The Pricing of Dividends in Equity Valuation

    John R. M. Hand;Wayne R. Landsman

Frequent Co-Authors

Mary E. Barth
Mary E. Barth Stanford University
William H. Beaver
William H. Beaver Stanford University
Mark H. Lang
Mark H. Lang University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Bradford Cornell
Bradford Cornell University of California, Los Angeles
Ken V. Peasnell
Ken V. Peasnell Lancaster University
Edward L. Maydew
Edward L. Maydew University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Peter F. Pope
Peter F. Pope Bocconi University
Douglas A. Shackelford
Douglas A. Shackelford University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Jeremy Bulow
Jeremy Bulow Stanford University
Tim Jenkinson
Tim Jenkinson University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Economics and Finance opens doors to a variety of related programs and career options, many of which can be pursued online. For those interested in foundational financial skills, bookkeeping courses provide essential training in managing accounts and financial records—an in-demand skill across businesses of all sizes.

Administrative roles can serve as a practical entry point into the finance sector. Earning an associate degree in office administration salary potential reflects the growing need for skilled professionals in managing office operations, records, and communications.

For those seeking advancement or a leadership role in personnel management within the economic or business field, choosing the best masters degree for hr professionals can give you a competitive edge and broaden your career options.

Data-driven decision-making is becoming essential in today’s business landscape. Earning credentials from the best online master's for teaching can help you develop analytical techniques and technology skills that are highly valued by employers.

Best Scientists Citing Wayne R. Landsman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles