World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
58
Citations
17704
World Ranking
3211
National Ranking
1239

Scott V. Ollinger publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott V. Ollinger sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 168 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Scott V. Ollinger D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott V. Ollinger sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Scott V. Ollinger is affiliated with the University of New Hampshire in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Environmental Science, with a substantial body of work in related subfields such as Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Environmental Engineering, and Soil Science.

The scientist's publications emphasize several main topics, including Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics, Forest Ecology and Management, Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications, Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics, Remote Sensing in Agriculture, Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies, and Plant Responses to Elevated CO2.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Scott V. Ollinger include:

  • Evidence, causes, and consequences of declining nitrogen availability in terrestrial ecosystems (2022, Science)
  • Carbon budget of the Harvard Forest Long-Term Ecological Research site: pattern, process, and response to global change (2020, Ecological Monographs)
  • Mapping canopy nitrogen in European forests using remote sensing and environmental variables with the random forests method (2020, Remote Sensing of Environment)
  • Tree Species Traits Determine the Success of LiDAR-Based Crown Mapping in a Mixed Temperate Forest (2020, Remote Sensing)
  • Beyond counts and averages: Relating geodiversity to dimensions of biodiversity (2020, Global Ecology and Biogeography)

The scientist frequently collaborates with a group of co-authors, with multiple joint publications alongside Andrew P. Ouimette, Andrew D. Richardson, Jack Hastings, Michael Palace, and Franklin B. Sullivan.

Scott V. Ollinger's work is often published in venues such as Harvard Dataverse, Science, Remote Sensing of Environment, Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences, and Ecological Monographs, reflecting the interdisciplinary nature of their research.

Best Publications

  • CO2 balance of boreal, temperate, and tropical forests derived from a global database

    Sebastiaan Luyssaert;Sebastiaan Luyssaert;I. Inglima;M. Jung;A. D. Richardson

  • Is Nitrogen Deposition Altering the Nitrogen Status of Northeastern Forests

    John D. Aber;Christine L. Goodale;Scott V. Ollinger;Marie-Louise Smith

  • Sources of variability in canopy reflectance and the convergent properties of plants

    Scott V. Ollinger

  • Use of digital webcam images to track spring green-up in a deciduous broadleaf forest.

    Andrew D. Richardson;Julian P. Jenkins;Bobby H. Braswell;David Y. Hollinger

  • Characterizing canopy biochemistry from imaging spectroscopy and its application to ecosystem studies

    Raymond F. Kokaly;Gregory P. Asner;Scott V. Ollinger;Mary E. Martin

  • Near-surface remote sensing of spatial and temporal variation in canopy phenology

    Andrew D. Richardson;Bobby H. Braswell;David Y. Hollinger;Julian P. Jenkins

  • Nitrogen Pollution in the Northeastern United States: Sources, Effects, and Management Options

    Charles T. Driscoll;David Whitall;John D. Aber;Elizabeth Boyer

  • Regional variation in foliar chemistry and n cycling among forests of diverse history and composition

    Scott V. Ollinger;Marie-Louise Smith;Mary E. Martin;Richard A. Hallett

  • Predicting the effects of climate change on water yield and forest production in the northeastern United States

    J. D. Aber;S. V. Ollinger;C. A. Federer;Peter B Reich

  • A Spatial Model of Atmospheric Deposition for the Northeastern U.S.

    Scott V. Ollinger;John D. Aber;Gary M. Lovett;Sarah E. Millham

  • Chronic nitrogen additions suppress decomposition and sequester soil carbon in temperate forests

    Serita D. Frey;Scott V. Ollinger;K. Nadelhoffer;R. Bowden

  • Canopy nitrogen, carbon assimilation, and albedo in temperate and boreal forests: Functional relations and potential climate feedbacks

    S. V. Ollinger;A. D. Richardson;M. E. Martin;D. Y. Hollinger

  • Forest carbon storage: ecology, management, and policy

    Timothy J Fahey;Peter B Woodbury;John J Battles;Christine L Goodale

  • Modeling nitrogen saturation in forest ecosystems in response to land use and atmospheric deposition

    John D. Aber;Scott V. Ollinger;Charles T. Driscoll

  • Evidence, causes, and consequences of declining nitrogen availability in terrestrial ecosystems

    Unknown

  • FOREST ECOSYSTEMS

    Unknown

  • Refining light-use efficiency calculations for a deciduous forest canopy using simultaneous tower-based carbon flux and radiometric measurements

    J.P. Jenkins;A.D. Richardson;B.H. Braswell;S.V. Ollinger

  • Biomass allocation and multiple resource limitation in tree seedlings

    C. D. Canham;A. R. Berkowitz;V. R. Kelly;Gary M. Lovett

  • Mercury Distribution Across 14 U.S. Forests. Part I: Spatial Patterns of Concentrations in Biomass, Litter, and Soils

    D. Obrist;D. W. Johnson;S. E. Lindberg;Y. Luo

  • DIRECT ESTIMATION OF ABOVEGROUND FOREST PRODUCTIVITY THROUGH HYPERSPECTRAL REMOTE SENSING OF CANOPY NITROGEN

    Marie-Louise Smith;Scott V. Ollinger;Mary E. Martin;John D. Aber

  • Interactive effects of nitrogen deposition, tropospheric ozone, elevated CO2 and land use history on the carbon dynamics of northern hardwood forests

    Scott V. Ollinger;John D. Aber;Peter B. Reich;Rita J. Freuder

  • Is Nitrogen Deposition Altering the Nitrogen Status of Northeastern Forests

    J. D. Aber;C. L. Goodale;S. V. Ollinger;M. Smith

Frequent Co-Authors

Christine L. Goodale
Christine L. Goodale Cornell University
Mary E. Martin
Mary E. Martin University of New Hampshire
John D. Aber
John D. Aber University of New Hampshire
David Y. Hollinger
David Y. Hollinger US Forest Service
Andrew D. Richardson
Andrew D. Richardson Northern Arizona University
Charles T. Driscoll
Charles T. Driscoll Syracuse University
Peter B. Reich
Peter B. Reich University of Minnesota
Steve Frolking
Steve Frolking University of New Hampshire
Serita D. Frey
Serita D. Frey University of New Hampshire
Jingfeng Xiao
Jingfeng Xiao University of New Hampshire

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring a range of related online degrees can enhance career prospects. Many find that pursuing one of the easiest bachelors degree programs offers a manageable entry point, especially those focused on environmental studies or sustainability.

Those drawn to earth systems and physical environments might consider an online geoscience degree. These programs provide critical knowledge on geology, natural resources, and environmental hazards, all vital for various green careers.

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) is another compelling pathway. Students can build specialized skills through leading gis degree programs, equipping them to analyze spatial data and support environmental planning and management initiatives.

For those aiming at leadership roles, a Master of Public Administration can be an excellent choice. Efficient options like the mpa one year programs provide advanced training in policy and administration, crucial for driving environmental policy and sustainable development projects.

Best Scientists Citing Scott V. Ollinger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles