World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
36
Citations
8334
World Ranking
9040
National Ranking
3239

Mary E. Martin publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary E. Martin sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 57 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Mary E. Martin D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary E. Martin sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mary E. Martin is affiliated with the University of New Hampshire in the United States. Their academic profile shows engagement in scientific research without detailed public records of specific papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues available.

There is no list of recent papers, main fields of study, subfields, or topics of work documented for Mary E. Martin in the accessible data. Similarly, there is no information on book publications or awards received.

Due to the lack of detailed published outputs or collaboration data, a comprehensive examination of their research focus or contributions in particular scientific domains cannot be provided at this time.

Best Publications

  • Is Nitrogen Deposition Altering the Nitrogen Status of Northeastern Forests

    John D. Aber;Christine L. Goodale;Scott V. Ollinger;Marie-Louise Smith

  • Characterizing canopy biochemistry from imaging spectroscopy and its application to ecosystem studies

    Raymond F. Kokaly;Gregory P. Asner;Scott V. Ollinger;Mary E. Martin

  • HIGH SPECTRAL RESOLUTION REMOTE SENSING OF FOREST CANOPY LIGNIN, NITROGEN, AND ECOSYSTEM PROCESSES

    Mary E. Martin;John D. Aber

  • Ecosystem response to 15 years of chronic nitrogen additions at the Harvard Forest LTER, Massachusetts, USA

    Alison H Magill;John D Aber;William S Currie;Knute J Nadelhoffer

  • Determining Forest Species Composition Using High Spectral Resolution Remote Sensing Data

    M.E Martin;S.D Newman;J.D Aber;R.G Congalton

  • Regional variation in foliar chemistry and n cycling among forests of diverse history and composition

    Scott V. Ollinger;Marie-Louise Smith;Mary E. Martin;Richard A. Hallett

  • Chronic nitrogen additions suppress decomposition and sequester soil carbon in temperate forests

    Serita D. Frey;Scott V. Ollinger;K. Nadelhoffer;R. Bowden

  • Canopy nitrogen, carbon assimilation, and albedo in temperate and boreal forests: Functional relations and potential climate feedbacks

    S. V. Ollinger;A. D. Richardson;M. E. Martin;D. Y. Hollinger

  • DIRECT ESTIMATION OF ABOVEGROUND FOREST PRODUCTIVITY THROUGH HYPERSPECTRAL REMOTE SENSING OF CANOPY NITROGEN

    Marie-Louise Smith;Scott V. Ollinger;Mary E. Martin;John D. Aber

  • Integrating waveform lidar with hyperspectral imagery for inventory of a northern temperate forest

    Jeanne E. Anderson;Lucie C. Plourde;Mary E. Martin;Bobby H. Braswell

  • Disentangling the role of photosynthesis and stomatal conductance on rising forest water-use efficiency.

    Rossella Guerrieri;Rossella Guerrieri;Soumaya Belmecheri;Scott V. Ollinger;Heidi Asbjornsen

  • Determination of carbon fraction and nitrogen concentration in tree foliage by near infrared reflectance : a comparison of statistical methods

    Katherine L. Bolster;Mary E. Martin;John D. Aber

  • A generalizable method for remote sensing of canopy nitrogen across a wide range of forest ecosystems

    Mary E. Martin;Lucie C. Plourde;Scott V. Ollinger;Marie-Louise Smith

  • Analysis of hyperspectral data for estimation of temperate forest canopy nitrogen concentration: comparison between an airborne (AVIRIS) and a spaceborne (Hyperion) sensor

    M.-L. Smith;M.E. Martin;L. Plourde;S.V. Ollinger

  • Ash decline assessment in emerald ash borer-infested regions: A test of tree-level, hyperspectral technologies

    Jennifer Pontius;Mary Martin;Lucie Plourde;Richard Hallett

  • Albedo estimates for land surface models and support for a new paradigm based on foliage nitrogen concentration

    David Y. Hollinger;S. V. Ollinger;A. D. Richardson;T. P. Meyers

  • Determination of nitrogen, lignin, and cellulose content of decomposing leaf material by near infrared reflectance spectroscopy

    Toni M. McLellan;John D. Aber;Mary E. Martin;Jerry M. Melillo

  • The use of waveform lidar to measure northern temperate mixed conifer and deciduous forest structure in New Hampshire

    Jeanne Anderson;M. E. Martin;M.-L. Smith;R. O. Dubayah

  • Prediction of eucalypt foliage nitrogen content from satellite-derived hyperspectral data

    N.C. Coops;M.-L. Smith;M.E. Martin;S.V. Ollinger

  • Quantity is Nothing without Quality: Automated QA/QC for Streaming Environmental Sensor Data

    John L. Campbell;Lindsey E. Rustad;John H. Porter;Jeffrey R. Taylor

  • Is Nitrogen Deposition Altering the Nitrogen Status of Northeastern Forests

    J. D. Aber;C. L. Goodale;S. V. Ollinger;M. Smith

Frequent Co-Authors

Scott V. Ollinger
Scott V. Ollinger University of New Hampshire
John D. Aber
John D. Aber University of New Hampshire
David Y. Hollinger
David Y. Hollinger US Forest Service
Nicholas C. Coops
Nicholas C. Coops University of British Columbia
Christine L. Goodale
Christine L. Goodale Cornell University
Andrew D. Richardson
Andrew D. Richardson Northern Arizona University
Knute J. Nadelhoffer
Knute J. Nadelhoffer University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Michelle Hofton
Michelle Hofton University of Maryland, College Park
William H. McDowell
William H. McDowell University of New Hampshire
Ralph Dubayah
Ralph Dubayah University of Maryland, College Park

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Many look for the easiest bachelor degree to get to balance workload with practical skills. Fields like Geology offer specialized knowledge about Earth processes and are available through reputable geology degrees online, which provide flexible learning models ideal for working professionals.

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) are increasingly important in environmental analysis. Pursuing one of the top gis degree programs can equip students with essential skills in spatial data management and mapping technologies. For those aiming for leadership in public environmental policy, pursuing a Master of Public Administration through a 1 year mpa online program offers an accelerated path to advanced credentials.

Combining Environmental Sciences with these complementary online degrees enhances career readiness, allowing graduates to tackle sustainability challenges in government, private sector, and nonprofit roles. The flexibility of online learning also helps balance education with professional development.

Best Scientists Citing Mary E. Martin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles