World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jean-Philip Piquemal

Jean-Philip Piquemal

D-Index & Metrics

Chemistry

D-Index
61
Citations
16873
World Ranking
9126
National Ranking
328

Jean-Philip Piquemal publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jean-Philip Piquemal sits on this spectrum.

61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 204 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

Jean-Philip Piquemal D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jean-Philip Piquemal sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jean-Philip Piquemal is affiliated with Sorbonne University in France. Their research spans multiple fields including Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, Physics and Astronomy, and Computer Science. Within these disciplines, Piquemal's work focuses on specialized subfields such as Atomic and Molecular Physics and Optics, Molecular Biology, Artificial Intelligence, Materials Chemistry, and Computational Theory and Mathematics.

The scientist's research topics cover a range of areas with significant contributions in Protein Structure and Dynamics, Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies, Machine Learning in Materials Science, Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture, Advanced Chemical Physics Studies, Quantum Information and Cryptography, and DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry.

Piquemal has published extensively in prominent scientific journals and venues. The most frequent publication outlets include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
  • The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Chemical Science

Among recent papers, key publications feature:

  • NCIPLOT4: Fast, Robust, and Quantitative Analysis of Noncovalent Interactions (2020, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation)
  • New Way for Probing Bond Strength (2020, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A)
  • NCIPLOTand the analysis of noncovalent interactions using the reduced density gradient (2020, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Molecular Science)
  • Tinker-HP: Accelerating Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Large Complex Systems with Advanced Point Dipole Polarizable Force Fields Using GPUs and Multi-GPU Systems (2021, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation)
  • High-resolution mining of the SARS-CoV-2 main protease conformational space: supercomputer-driven unsupervised adaptive sampling (2021, Chemical Science)

Collaborative efforts are apparent through frequent co-authorship. Notable coauthors include:

  • Louis Lagardère
  • Olivier Adjoua
  • Pengyu Ren
  • Thomas Plé
  • Théo Jaffrelot Inizan

Best Publications

  • NCIPLOT: A Program for Plotting Noncovalent Interaction Regions

    Julia Contreras-García;Erin R. Johnson;Shahar Keinan;Robin Chaudret

  • Tinker 8: Software Tools for Molecular Design.

    Joshua A Rackers;Zhi Wang;Chao Lu;Marie L Laury

  • Are Bond Critical Points Really Critical for Hydrogen Bonding

    Joseph R. Lane;Julia Contreras-García;Jean-Philip Piquemal;Benjamin J. Miller

  • Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Ionic Liquids and Electrolytes Using Polarizable Force Fields.

    Dmitry Bedrov;Jean-Philip Piquemal;Oleg Borodin;Alexander D. MacKerell

  • The Independent Gradient Model: A New Approach for Probing Strong and Weak Interactions in Molecules from Wave Function Calculations.

    Corentin Lefebvre;Hassan Khartabil;Jean-Charles Boisson;Julia Contreras-García

  • Anisotropic, Polarizable Molecular Mechanics Studies of Inter- and Intramolecular Interactions and Ligand–Macromolecule Complexes. A Bottom-Up Strategy

    Nohad Gresh;G. Andrés Cisneros;Thomas A. Darden;Jean Philip Piquemal

  • Polarizable Force Fields for Biomolecular Simulations: Recent Advances and Applications.

    Zhifeng Jing;Chengwen Liu;Sara Y. Cheng;Rui Qi

  • AMOEBA Polarizable Atomic Multipole Force Field for Nucleic Acids.

    Changsheng Zhang;Chao Lu;Zhifeng Jing;Chuanjie Wu

  • NCIPLOT4: Fast, Robust, and Quantitative Analysis of Noncovalent Interactions

    Roberto A. Boto;Francesca Peccati;Rubén Laplaza;Chaoyu Quan

  • Towards accurate solvation dynamics of divalent cations in water using the polarizable amoeba force field: From energetics to structure.

    Jean Philip Piquemal;Lalith Perera;G. Andrés Cisneros;Pengyu Ren

  • Tinker-HP: a massively parallel molecular dynamics package for multiscale simulations of large complex systems with advanced point dipole polarizable force fields

    Louis Lagardère;Luc-Henri Jolly;Filippo Lipparini;Félix Aviat

  • New Way for Probing Bond Strength

    Johanna Klein;Hassan Khartabil;Jean-Charles Boisson;Julia Contreras-García

  • Towards a force field based on density fitting

    Jean Philip Piquemal;G. András Cisneros;Peter Reinhardt;Nohad Gresh

  • A QM/MM Approach Using the AMOEBA Polarizable Embedding: From Ground State Energies to Electronic Excitations.

    Daniele Loco;Étienne Polack;Stefano Caprasecca;Louis Lagardère

  • Polarizable Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Zn(II) in Water Using the AMOEBA Force Field

    Johnny C. Wu;Jean Philip Piquemal;Jean Philip Piquemal;Robin Chaudret;Robin Chaudret;Peter Reinhardt;Peter Reinhardt

  • Unraveling non-covalent interactions within flexible biomolecules: from electron density topology to gas phase spectroscopy

    R. Chaudret;B. De Courcy;J. Contreras-García;Eric Gloaguen

  • Interpretation of the reduced density gradient

    Roberto A. Boto;Julia Contreras-García;Julien Tierny;Jean-Philip Piquemal

  • Improved Formulas for the Calculation of the Electrostatic Contribution to the Intermolecular Interaction Energy from Multipolar Expansion of the Electronic Distribution.

    Jean-Philip Piquemal;Nohad Gresh;Claude Giessner-Prettre

  • Revealing strong interactions with the reduced density gradient: a benchmark for covalent, ionic and charge-shift bonds

    Roberto A. Boto;Jean-Philip Piquemal;Jean-Philip Piquemal;Julia Contreras-García;Julia Contreras-García

  • AMOEBA+ Classical Potential for Modeling Molecular Interactions

    Chengwen Liu;Jean-Philip Piquemal;Jean-Philip Piquemal;Pengyu Ren

  • Generalization of the Gaussian electrostatic model: Extension to arbitrary angular momentum, distributed multipoles, and speedup with reciprocal space methods

    G. Andrés Cisneros;Jean-Philip Piquemal;Thomas A. Darden

Frequent Co-Authors

Nohad Gresh
Nohad Gresh Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Pengyu Ren
Pengyu Ren The University of Texas at Austin
Yvon Maday
Yvon Maday Sorbonne University
Benedetta Mennucci
Benedetta Mennucci University of Pisa
Eric Cancès
Eric Cancès École des Ponts ParisTech
Giovanni Scalmani
Giovanni Scalmani Gaussian Inc.
Lalith Perera
Lalith Perera National Institutes of Health
Kenneth D. Jordan
Kenneth D. Jordan University of Pittsburgh
Lee G. Pedersen
Lee G. Pedersen University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Weitao Yang
Weitao Yang Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in expanding their expertise beyond traditional Chemistry, online programs offer versatile pathways related to forensic science and criminal justice. Exploring online colleges for forensic science can be a valuable next step, providing practical knowledge that bridges chemistry with investigative techniques.

Specialized degrees such as an online forensic psychology masters allow candidates to deepen their understanding of the human behavior aspects behind criminal cases. These programs complement scientific skills with psychological insights, broadening career opportunities in law enforcement and legal systems.

Career prospects in this arena remain strong, with numerous options available for graduates. A look at forensic science career paths highlights roles in crime laboratories, law enforcement agencies, and private sector labs that rely heavily on chemistry expertise. This synergy enhances the impact of scientific analysis in solving crimes.

Additionally, students should consider the financial aspect when choosing programs. Understanding the criminal justice degree cost can help balance education investment with long-term career benefits. Affordable online options make these interdisciplinary fields more accessible for many learners.

Best Scientists Citing Jean-Philip Piquemal

Trending Scientists