World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Elizabeth J. Zechmeister

Elizabeth J. Zechmeister

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Political Science 28 1355 1233 676 594 105 4608

Elizabeth J. Zechmeister publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Elizabeth J. Zechmeister between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Elizabeth J. Zechmeister published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 4.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2010. 13 of the 120 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2010. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 19 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 5 publications
2000 2025

120 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Elizabeth J. Zechmeister: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 2
2002 1
2003 0
2004 0
2005 3
2006 4
2007 6
2008 5
2009 10
2010 19
2011 4
2012 5
2013 6
2014 2
2015 2
2016 3
2017 5
2018 6
2019 2
2020 5
2021 5
2022 3
2023 8
2024 8
2025 5
Total 120
Download as CSV

Elizabeth J. Zechmeister publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth J. Zechmeister sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
20 40 60 80
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 333+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 97. Most scientists, 97, have 333+ publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–105 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36–40 publications 333+

This scientist: 105 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 10
41–45 11
46–50 25
51–55 27
56–60 44
61–65 52
66–70 62
71–75 62
76–80 79
81–85 71
86–90 82
91–95 65
96–100 85
101–105 76 105
106–110 66
111–115 78
116–120 67
121–125 73
126–130 73
131–135 64
136–140 45
141–145 53
146–150 44
151–155 45
156–160 33
161–165 32
166–170 28
171–175 31
176–180 29
181–185 27
186–190 36
191–195 27
196–200 24
201–205 16
206–210 16
211–215 19
216–220 16
221–225 17
226–230 18
231–235 23
236–240 17
241–245 13
246–250 17
251–255 9
256–260 13
261–265 8
266–270 12
271–275 8
276–280 10
281–285 13
286–290 13
291–295 5
296–300 6
301–305 11
306–310 9
311–315 6
316–320 4
321–325 4
326–330 2
331–332 5
333+ 97
Download as CSV

Elizabeth J. Zechmeister D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth J. Zechmeister sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 43 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 62+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 100. Most scientists, 100, have 62+ D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 28 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 28 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 76
21 79
22 84
23 68
24 88
25 82
26 76
27 75
28 99 28
29 96
30 96
31 81
32 86
33 81
34 84
35 72
36 58
37 53
38 48
39 40
40 40
41 32
42 26
43 25
44 33
45 33
46 17
47 21
48 22
49 18
50 19
51 19
52 15
53 14
54 10
55 13
56 9
57 11
58 12
59 10
60 5
61 7
62+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Elizabeth J. Zechmeister is affiliated with Vanderbilt University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the social sciences, with significant contributions in the subfields of sociology and political science, political science and international relations, gender studies, communication, and economics and econometrics.

The scientist's work addresses multiple topics within their field, including:

  • Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Media and Politics
  • Gender Politics and Representation
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Populism, Right-Wing Movements
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Social Capital and Networks

Recent publications by Elizabeth J. Zechmeister include studies published in prominent academic venues:

  • "The Curious Case of Theresa May and the Public That Did Not Rally: Gendered Reactions to Terrorist Attacks Can Cause Slumps Not Bumps", 2021, American Political Science Review
  • "Reducing mask resistance among White evangelical Christians with value-consistent messages", 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Conceptualizing and Measuring Support for Democracy: A New Approach", 2024, Comparative Political Studies
  • "Social Media Disruption: Messaging Mistrust in Latin America", 2020, Journal of democracy
  • "The early COVID-19 pandemic and democratic attitudes", 2021, PLoS ONE

Elizabeth J. Zechmeister frequently publishes in the following venues and has a strong presence in these outlets:

  • Harvard Dataverse
  • PS Political Science & Politics
  • American Political Science Review
  • Comparative Political Studies
  • Revista Latinoamericana de Opinión Pública

The scientist collaborates regularly with several co-authors, with multiple joint publications recorded. Frequent collaborators include Jennifer L. Merolla, Noam Lupu, Oscar Castorena, Mirya R. Holman, and Stephanie L. DeMora.

Best Publications

  • Latin American Party Systems

    Herbert Kitschelt;Kirk A. Hawkins;Juan Pablo Luna;Guillermo Rosas

  • Democracy at Risk: How Terrorist Threats Affect the Public

    Jennifer Lee Merolla;Elizabeth J. Zechmeister

  • Political Representation in Latin America A Study of Elite-Mass Congruence in Nine Countries

    Juan P. Luna;Elizabeth J. Zechmeister

  • What’s Left and Who’s Right? A Q-method Study of Individual and Contextual Influences on the Meaning of Ideological Labels

    Elizabeth Zechmeister

  • Beyond the “Narrow Data Base”: Another Convenience Sample for Experimental Research

    Cindy D. Kam;Jennifer R. Wilking;Elizabeth J. Zechmeister

  • Name Recognition and Candidate Support

    Cindy D. Kam;Elizabeth J. Zechmeister

  • Terrorist Threat, Male Stereotypes, and Candidate Evaluations

    Mirya R. Holman;Jennifer L. Merolla;Elizabeth J. Zechmeister

  • The Varying Political Toll of Concerns About Corruption in Good Versus Bad Economic Times

    Elizabeth J. Zechmeister;Daniel Zizumbo-Colunga

  • The Latin American Voter: Pursuing Representation and Accountability in Challenging Contexts

    Ryan E. Carlin;Matthew M. Singer;Elizabeth J. Zechmeister

  • Better the Devil You Know Than the Saint You Don't? Risk Propensity and Vote Choice in Mexico

    Scott Morgenstern;Elizabeth Zechmeister

  • Sex, Stereotypes, and Security: A Study of the Effects of Terrorist Threat on Assessments of Female Leadership

    Mirya R. Holman;Jennifer L. Merolla;Elizabeth J. Zechmeister

  • Crisis, Charisma, and Consequences: Evidence from the 2004 U.S. Presidential Election

    Jennifer L. Merolla;Jennifer M. Ramos;Elizabeth J. Zechmeister

  • Individual and Contextual Constraints on Ideological Labels in Latin America

    Elizabeth J. Zechmeister;Margarita Corral

  • Terrorist Threat, Leadership, and the Vote: Evidence from Three Experiments

    Jennifer L. Merolla;Elizabeth J. Zechmeister

  • Natural Disaster and Democratic Legitimacy: The Public Opinion Consequences of Chile's 2010 Earthquake and Tsunami

    Ryan E. Carlin;Gregory J. Love;Elizabeth J. Zechmeister

  • It's Not Easy Being Green: Minor Party Labels as Heuristic Aids

    Travis G. Coan;Jennifer L. Merolla;Laura B. Stephenson;Elizabeth J. Zechmeister

  • Can Canadians Take a Hint? The (In)Effectiveness of Party Labels as Information Shortcuts in Canada

    Jennifer L. Merolla;Laura B. Stephenson;Elizabeth J. Zechmeister

  • Can experience overcome stereotypes in times of terror threat

    Mirya R. Holman;Jennifer L. Merolla;Elizabeth J. Zechmeister

  • The Curious Case of Theresa May and the Public That Did Not Rally: Gendered Reactions to Terrorist Attacks Can Cause Slumps Not Bumps

    Mirya R. Holman;Jennifer L. Merolla;Elizabeth J. Zechmeister

  • Reducing mask resistance among White evangelical Christians with value-consistent messages.

    Stephanie L. DeMora;Jennifer L. Merolla;Brian Newman;Elizabeth J. Zechmeister

  • Political Representation in Latin America

    Juan Pablo Luna;Elizabeth J. Zechmeister

  • Latin American Party Systems: Bibliography

    Herbert Kitschelt;Kirk A. Hawkins;Juan Pablo Luna;Guillermo Rosas

Frequent Co-Authors

Jennifer L. Merolla
Jennifer L. Merolla University of California, Riverside
Herbert Kitschelt
Herbert Kitschelt Duke University
Kirk A. Hawkins
Kirk A. Hawkins Brigham Young University
Mirya R. Holman
Mirya R. Holman University of Houston
Laura B. Stephenson
Laura B. Stephenson University of Western Ontario
Cindy D. Kam
Cindy D. Kam Vanderbilt University
Noam Lupu
Noam Lupu Vanderbilt University
Matthew M. Singer
Matthew M. Singer University of Connecticut
Fabrice Lehoucq
Fabrice Lehoucq University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Scott Morgenstern
Scott Morgenstern University of Pittsburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Political Science in the USA opens up diverse academic and professional opportunities. Many students often pair their studies with interdisciplinary fields to broaden their career options. For example, those interested in public policy or environmental issues may consider high-paying jobs with environmental science degree backgrounds, as these combine environmental knowledge with political frameworks.

Developing strong analytical skills is crucial in Political Science, and some students pursue an online bachelor degree mathematics to further enhance their research and data analysis abilities. Others may be drawn to careers in information management or library sciences, where understanding policy and information systems intersect. The best online library science programs offer specialized training for such roles.

Additionally, many Political Science graduates explore legal, academic, or advocacy professions that benefit from a strong foundation in history. Earning degrees in history can provide the contextual understanding needed for these impactful career paths.

Best Scientists Citing Elizabeth J. Zechmeister

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles