World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
31
Citations
6711
World Ranking
1059
National Ranking
545

Cindy D. Kam publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cindy D. Kam sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 71 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Cindy D. Kam D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cindy D. Kam sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Overview

Cindy D. Kam is affiliated with Vanderbilt University in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on social sciences, with a notable concentration in sociology and political science. The scholar's work encompasses key areas such as social and intergroup psychology, gender studies, and public health-related topics.

The main topics explored in Cindy D. Kam's research include:

  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Gender, Feminism, and Media
  • Gender Politics and Representation
  • Gender Studies in Language
  • Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Gender Roles and Identity Studies
  • Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum

Kam has contributed to a variety of academic publications, with frequent appearances in well-known journals such as Public Opinion Quarterly and The Journal of Politics. Other frequent publication venues include Harvard Dataverse, Journal of Experimental Political Science, and The Leadership Quarterly.

Representative papers authored or co-authored by Cindy D. Kam include:

  • "MOBILIZING AND DEMOBILIZING" (2021) in Public Opinion Quarterly
  • "Babies and Ballots: Timing of Childbirth and Voter Turnout" (2022) in The Journal of Politics

In addition, the researcher has collaborated frequently with a number of other academics. Notable frequent coauthors include:

  • Allison M.N. Archer
  • Jennifer Jerit
  • Andrew Engelhardt
  • Scott Clifford
  • Bert N. Bakker

The scholar's recent works also demonstrate intersections with gender and leadership studies, reflected in co-authored papers such as:

  • "Modern Sexism in Modern Times Public Opinion in the #Metoo Era" (2020)
  • "She is the chair(man): Gender, language, and leadership" (2022)

The range of topics and interdisciplinary subfields addressed in Kam's research reflect a broad engagement with gender, political behavior, and social psychological processes. Their work spans studies of inequality, voter behavior, and everyday social biases across sociopolitical contexts.

Best Publications

  • Us Against Them: Ethnocentric Foundations of American Opinion

    Donald R. Kinder;Cindy D. Kam

  • Modeling and Interpreting Interactive Hypotheses in Regression Analysis

    Robert J Franzese;Cindy Kam

  • Beyond the Self: Social Identity, Altruism, and Political Participation

    James H. Fowler;Cindy D. Kam

  • Who Toes the Party Line? Cues, Values, and Individual Differences

    Cindy D. Kam

  • Reconsidering the Effects of Education on Political Participation

    Cindy D. Kam;Carl L. Palmer

  • Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science: Students as Experimental Participants

    James N. Druckman;Cindy D. Kam

  • Students as Experimental Participants: A Defense of the ‘Narrow Data Base

    James N. Druckman;D KamCindy;Cindy D. Kam

  • Terror and Ethnocentrism: Foundations of American Support for the War on Terrorism

    Cindy D. Kam;Donald R. Kinder

  • Beyond the “Narrow Data Base”: Another Convenience Sample for Experimental Research

    Cindy D. Kam;Jennifer R. Wilking;Elizabeth J. Zechmeister

  • Name Recognition and Candidate Support

    Cindy D. Kam;Elizabeth J. Zechmeister

  • Risk Attitudes and Political Participation

    Cindy D. Kam

  • Risk Orientations and Policy Frames

    Cindy D. Kam;Elizabeth N. Simas

  • Ethnocentrism as a Short-Term Force in the 2008 American Presidential Election

    Cindy D. Kam;Donald R. Kinder

  • Implicit Attitudes, Explicit Choices: When Subliminal Priming Predicts Candidate Preference

    Cindy D. Kam

  • Joining and Leaving the Rally Understanding the Surge and Decline in Presidential Approval Following 9/11

    Cindy D. Kam;Jennifer M. Ramos

  • The Long-Term Dynamics of Partisanship and Issue Orientations

    Benjamin Highton;Cindy D. Kam

  • At the Nexus of Observational and Experimental Research: Theory, Specification, and Analysis of Experiments with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects

    Cindy D. Kam;Marc J. Trussler

  • Reaching Out or Pulling Back: Macroeconomic Conditions and Public Support for Social Welfare Spending

    Cindy D. Kam;Yunju Nam

  • Uncovering Reactions to the Racial Resentment Scale across the Racial Divide

    Cindy D. Kam;Camille D. Burge

  • Rejoinder: Reinvestigating the Causal Relationship between Higher Education and Political Participation

    Cindy D. Kam;Carl L. Palmer

  • Risk Attitudes and the Incumbency Advantage

    David L. Eckles;Cindy D. Kam;Cherie L. Maestas;Brian F. Schaffner

  • Risk Attitudes, Candidate Characteristics, and Vote Choice

    Cindy D. Kam;Elizabeth N. Simas

  • Disgust Sensitivity and Public Demand for Protection

    Cindy D. Kam;Beth A. Estes

  • Boycotting, Buycotting, and the Psychology of Political Consumerism

    Cindy D. Kam;Maggie Deichert

Frequent Co-Authors

Donald R. Kinder
Donald R. Kinder University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
James H. Fowler
James H. Fowler University of California, San Diego
James N. Druckman
James N. Druckman University of Rochester
Elizabeth J. Zechmeister
Elizabeth J. Zechmeister Vanderbilt University
Benjamin Highton
Benjamin Highton University of California, Davis
Cherie D. Maestas
Cherie D. Maestas Purdue University West Lafayette

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Political Science opens many doors, including a range of online degrees and accelerated pathways. If you’re interested in broadening your skillset, interdisciplinary studies degree programs allow students to combine politics, economics, sociology, and more into a tailored learning experience. This flexibility can be ideal for diverse interests and evolving career goals.

For those looking to specialize, consider the online graduate history programs. These programs complement a political science background with advanced research skills and a deeper understanding of historical context, making graduates more competitive in public policy and education fields.

If you wish to boost your resume quickly, there are many quick certificate programs that focus on practical skills and can be completed in a short time. Certificates in areas like public administration, data analysis, or project management are especially valued by employers.

Need a graduate credential fast? The fastest online master’s degree options can help you advance your academic qualifications on a tight schedule. These programs are designed for working adults seeking efficient, flexible advancement in their political science careers.

Best Scientists Citing Cindy D. Kam

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles