World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
21
Citations
2593
World Ranking
1911
National Ranking
958

Cherie D. Maestas publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cherie D. Maestas sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 53 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Cherie D. Maestas D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cherie D. Maestas sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 21 D-Index — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • The Sense of a Woman: Gender, Ambition, and the Decision to Run for Congress

    Sarah A. Fulton;Cherie D. Maestas;L. Sandy Maisel;Walter J. Stone

  • Professional Legislatures and Ambitious Politicians: Policy Responsiveness of State Institutions

    Cherie Maestas

  • When to Risk It? Institutions, Ambitions, and the Decision to Run for the U.S. House

    Cherie D. Maestas;Sarah Fulton;L. Sandy Maisel;Walter J. Stone

  • Quality Counts: Extending the Strategic Politician Model of Incumbent Deterrence

    Walter J. Stone;L. Sandy Maisel;Cherie D. Maestas

  • The Incentive to Listen: Progressive Ambition, Resources, and Opinion Monitoring among State Legislators

    Cherie Maestas

  • Shifting the Blame: Federalism, Media, and Public Assignment of Blame Following Hurricane Katrina

    Cherie D. Maestas;Lonna Rae Atkeson;Thomas Croom;Lisa A. Bryant

  • Risk Orientation, Risk Exposure, and Policy Opinions: The Case of Free Trade

    Sean Ehrlich;Cherie Maestas

  • Incumbency Reconsidered: Prospects, Strategic Retirement, and Incumbent Quality in U.S. House Elections

    Walter J. Stone;Sarah A. Fulton;Cherie D. Maestas;L. Sandy Maisel

  • Catastrophic Politics: How Extraordinary Events Redefine Perceptions of Government

    Lonna Rae Atkeson;Cherie D. Maestas

  • The State of Surveying Legislators: Dilemmas and Suggestions

    Cherie Maestas;Grant W. Neeley;Lilliard E. Richardson

  • Risk Attitudes and the Incumbency Advantage

    David L. Eckles;Cindy D. Kam;Cherie L. Maestas;Brian F. Schaffner

  • State Legislative Influence over Agency Rulemaking: The Utility of Ex Ante Review

    Brian J. Gerber;Cherie Maestas;Nelson C. Dometrius

  • National Party Efforts to Recruit State Legislators to Run for the U.S. House

    Cherie D. Maestas;L. Sandy Maisel;Walter J. Stone

  • Assessing the “Experience Bonus” Through Examining Strategic Entry, Candidate Quality, and Campaign Receipts in U.S. House Elections

    Cherie D. Maestas;Cynthia R. Rugeley

  • Extracting Wisdom from Experts and Small Crowds: Strategies for Improving Informant-based Measures of Political Concepts

    Cherie D. Maestas;Matthew K. Buttice;Walter J. Stone

  • Should I vote-by-mail or in person? The impact of COVID-19 risk factors and partisanship on vote mode decisions in the 2020 presidential election

    Unknown

  • Quality Counts: Extending the Strategic Politician Model of Incumbent Deterrence

    Unknown

  • Shifting the Blame: Federalism, Media, and Public Assignment of Blame Following Hurricane Katrina

    Cherie D Maestas;Lonna Rae Atkeson;Thomas Croom;Lisa Bryant

  • Policy venue preference and relative trust in government in federal systems

    Suzanne Leland;Jacqueline Chattopadhyay;Cherie Maestas;Jaclyn Piatak

  • Meaningful Participation and the Evolution of the Reformed Presidential Nominating System

    Lonna Rae Atkeson;Cherie D. Maestas

Frequent Co-Authors

Lonna Rae Atkeson
Lonna Rae Atkeson Florida State University
Walter J. Stone
Walter J. Stone University of California, Davis
Cindy D. Kam
Cindy D. Kam Vanderbilt University
Lilliard E. Richardson
Lilliard E. Richardson Pennsylvania State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Cherie D. Maestas