World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
22
Citations
1699
World Ranking
1871
National Ranking
937

Neal D. Woods publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neal D. Woods sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 51 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Neal D. Woods D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neal D. Woods sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 22 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Overview

Neal D. Woods is affiliated with the University of South Carolina in the United States. Their academic work spans multiple aspects of environmental policy and economics, with a focus on the intersections of social sciences and economics.

Woods's recent research outputs include the following papers:

  • An Environmental Race to the Bottom? "No More Stringent" Laws in the American States (2020), published in Publius The Journal of Federalism
  • The State of State Environmental Policy Research: A Thirty-Year Progress Report (2021), published in Review of Policy Research
  • Do green policies produce green jobs? (2022), published in Social Science Quarterly
  • Regulatory competition, administrative discretion, and environmental policy implementation (2021), published in Review of Policy Research
  • Structuring Bureaucratic Performance? Assessing the Policy Impact of Environmental Agency Design (2024), published in Sustainability

The main fields of study for Neal D. Woods include social sciences and economics, econometrics, and finance. Their work further delves into several subfields, notably:

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Strategy and Management
  • Global and Planetary Change

Neal D. Woods addresses a range of research topics predominantly related to environmental and economic policy. Key topics include:

  • Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
  • Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Policy Transfer and Learning
  • Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics

Frequent co-authors in Woods's work include Jiyoon Kang and Morgan A. Lowder. The research has appeared multiple times in venues such as Review of Policy Research, Publius The Journal of Federalism, Social Science Quarterly, Sustainability, and Water.

Best Publications

  • Interstate competition and environmental regulation : A test of the race-to-the-bottom thesis

    Neal D. Woods

  • Policy Diffusion and the Pro-innovation Bias

    Andrew Karch;Sean C. Nicholson-Crotty;Neal D. Woods;Ann O.M. Bowman

  • Dimensions of State Environmental Policies

    Matthew Potoski;Neal D. Woods

  • Measuring State Environmental Policy

    David M. Konisky;Neal D. Woods

  • Exporting Air Pollution? Regulatory Enforcement and Environmental Free Riding in the United States

    David M. Konisky;Neal D. Woods

  • Legislative Professionalism and Influence on State Agencies: The Effects of Resources and Careerism

    Neal D. Woods;Michael Baranowski

  • Designing State Clean Air Agencies: Administrative Procedures and Bureaucratic Autonomy

    Matthew Potoski;Neal D. Woods

  • Primacy Implementation of Environmental Policy in the U.S. States

    Neal D. Woods

  • Environmental Policy, Federalism, and the Obama Presidency

    David M. Konisky;Neal D. Woods

  • Gone with the Wind: Federalism and the Strategic Location of Air Polluters

    James E. Monogan;David M. Konisky;Neal D. Woods

  • Strength in Numbers: Why States Join Interstate Compacts

    Ann O'm. Bowman;Neal D. Woods

  • Promoting Participation? An Examination of Rulemaking Notification and Access Procedures

    Neal D. Woods

  • Environmental Free Riding in State Water Pollution Enforcement

    David M. Konisky;Neal D. Woods

  • The Policy Consequences of Political Corruption : Evidence from State Environmental Programs

    Neal D. Woods

  • Environmental Federalism Revisited: Second-Order Devolution in Air Quality Regulation

    Neal D. Woods;Matthew Potoski

  • Environmental Federalism and the Trump Presidency: A Preliminary Assessment

    David M Konisky;Neal D Woods

  • Regulatory Democracy Reconsidered: The Policy Impact of Public Participation Requirements

    Neal D. Woods

  • Policy Innovativeness and Interstate Compacts

    Sean C. Nicholson-Crotty;Neal D. Woods;Ann O.M. Bowman;Andrew Karch

  • Procedural Fairness and the Legitimacy of Agency Rulemaking

    Alexander I Ruder;Neal D Woods

  • Political Influence on Agency Rule Making: Examining the Effects of Legislative and Gubernatorial Rule Review Powers:

    Neal D. Woods

  • Interest Group Influence on State Administrative Rule Making The Impact of Rule Review

    Neal D. Woods

  • Blurring Borders: The Effect of Federal Activism on Interstate Cooperation

    Neal D. Woods;Ann O'm. Bowman

Frequent Co-Authors

David M. Konisky
David M. Konisky Indiana University
Ann O'm. Bowman
Ann O'm. Bowman Texas A&M University
Matthew Potoski
Matthew Potoski University of California, Santa Barbara
Sean Nicholson-Crotty
Sean Nicholson-Crotty Indiana University
Ellen D. B. Riggle
Ellen D. B. Riggle University of Kentucky
Richard C. Fording
Richard C. Fording University of Alabama
Christopher Witko
Christopher Witko University of California, Davis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Political Science opens doors to multiple online degree and certification options. Many students benefit from interdisciplinary studies degree programs online, which offer flexible curriculums and allow you to combine political science with related fields such as sociology, economics, or communications.

If you’re interested in deepening your historical context for policy or governance, online MA history programs can be a valuable path. These programs are often affordable and compatible with full-time work, letting you advance your education on your own schedule.

For those seeking quick, job-ready credentials, there are short certificate programs that pay well. These certifications can help you enter high-demand fields like public administration, nonprofit management, or data analysis, often within months instead of years.

Lastly, if you want to fast-track your career advancement, consider a shortest masters degree. These accelerated options allow you to earn a master’s in as little as one year, so you can quickly pivot or level up in your chosen field while building on your political science background.

Best Scientists Citing Neal D. Woods

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles