World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
30
Citations
8819
World Ranking
1123
National Ranking
572

Richard C. Fording publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard C. Fording sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 89 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Richard C. Fording D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard C. Fording sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard C. Fording is affiliated with the University of Alabama in the United States and has produced research predominantly in the field of social sciences. Their work spans multiple subfields, with a focus on political science and international relations, sociology and political science, gender studies, social psychology, and economics and econometrics.

The research topics covered by Richard C. Fording include electoral systems and political participation, policy transfer and learning, social policy and reform studies, LGBTQ health, identity, and policy, social and intergroup psychology, hate speech and cyberbullying detection, and gender politics and representation.

The scientist has contributed papers to several publication venues, including:

  • Perspectives on Politics
  • State Politics & Policy Quarterly
  • RSF The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
  • Polity
  • Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior

Some recent notable papers authored by Richard C. Fording include:

  • The Affordable Care Act and the Diffusion of Policy Feedback: The Case of Medicaid Work Requirements (2020) - RSF The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
  • Pride or Prejudice? Clarifying the Role of White Racial Identity in Recent Presidential Elections (2022) - Polity

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers, with several co-authors appearing repeatedly in their work. These frequent co-authors include Sanford F. Schram, Robert J. Cramer, Dana Patton, Andréa R. Kaniuka, and Raymond P. Tucker.

Richard C. Fording's research demonstrates an engagement with topics that intersect political behavior, identity, policy reform, and social issues. Their scholarship contributes to understanding complex social dynamics through lenses such as racial identity, policy diffusion, and political participation.

Best Publications

  • Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States, 1960-93

    William D. Berry;Evan J. Ringquist;Richard C. Fording;Russell L. Hanson

  • Disciplining the Poor: Neoliberal Paternalism and the Persistent Power of Race

    Joe Soss;Richard C Fording;Sanford F Schram

  • Deciding to Discipline: Race, Choice, and Punishment at the Frontlines of Welfare Reform

    Sanford F. Schram;Joe Soss;Richard C. Fording;Linda Houser

  • Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the U.S. States: A Re-appraisal:

    William D. Berry;Richard C. Fording;Evan J. Ringquist;Russell L. Hanson

  • Voter ideology in Western Democracies, 1946– 1989

    Heemin Kim;Richard C. Fording

  • The organization of discipline: From performance management to perversity and punishment

    Joe Soss;Richard Fording;Sanford F. Schram

  • The Color of Devolution: Race, Federalism, and the Politics of Social Control

    Joe Soss;Richard C. Fording;Sanford F. Schram

  • Race and the Politics of Welfare Reform

    Sanford F. Schram;Joe Brian Soss;Richard Carl Fording

  • Reassessing the “Race to the Bottom” in State Welfare Policy

    William D. Berry;Richard C. Fording;Russell L. Hanson

  • The Conditional Effect of Violence as a Political Tactic: Mass Insurgency, Welfare Generosity, and Electoral Context in the American States

    Richard C. Fording

  • An Annual Cost of Living Index for the American States, 1960-1995

    William D. Berry;Richard C. Fording;Russell L. Hanson

  • Politics and State Punitiveness in Black and White

    Jeff Yates;Richard C. Fording

  • Devolution, Discretion, and the Effect of Local Political Values on TANF Sanctioning

    Richard C. Fording;Joe Soss;Sanford F. Schram

  • Government partisanship in Western democracies, 1945–1998

    Heemin Kim;Richard C. Fording

  • The third level of US welfare reform: governmentality under neoliberal paternalism

    Sanford F. Schram;Joe Soss;Linda Houser;Richard C. Fording

  • The Political Response to Black Insurgency: A Critical Test of Competing Theories of the State

    Richard C. Fording

  • Voter ideology in Western democracies: An update

    Heemin Kim;Richard C. Fording

  • The Measurement and Stability of State Citizen Ideology

    William D. Berry;Evan J. Ringquist;Richard C. Fording;Russell L. Hanson

  • Neo-liberal poverty governance: race, place and the punitive turn in US welfare policy

    Sanford F. Schram;Richard C. Fording;Joe Soss

  • Race and the local politics of punishment in the new world of welfare.

    Richard C. Fording;Joe Soss;Sanford F. Schram

  • Does Tactical Voting Matter?: The Political Impact of Tactical Voting in Recent British Elections

    Heemin Kim;Richard C. Fording

  • Deciding to Discipline: Race, Choice, and Punishment on the Frontlines of Welfare Reform

    Sanford F. Schram;Joe Soss;Richard Fording;Linda Houser;Linda Houser

Frequent Co-Authors

Sanford F. Schram
Sanford F. Schram City University of New York
Joe Soss
Joe Soss University of Minnesota
William D. Berry
William D. Berry Florida State University
Evan J. Ringquist
Evan J. Ringquist Indiana University Bloomington
Neal D. Woods
Neal D. Woods University of South Carolina

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Political Science in the USA opens several related academic and career doors. Many students broaden their options by exploring online programs in other disciplines, such as the online mathematics degrees that strengthen analytical skills and support careers in policy analysis and research.

Pairing Political Science with historical perspectives can be beneficial. Reviewing the history degree types available online helps students understand context and trends that shape today’s political landscape.

Students interested in research, archives, or information management may benefit from exploring online library schools. These programs prepare graduates for roles in government agencies, think tanks, or public administration.

Political issues often intersect with environmental concerns. Graduates can also look at environmental science degree jobs for emerging opportunities in environmental policy, advocacy, and law, where knowledge of both political science and science is valuable.

Best Scientists Citing Richard C. Fording

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles