World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Andrew J. Friedland

Andrew J. Friedland

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
41
Citations
5247
World Ranking
7846
National Ranking
2780

Andrew J. Friedland publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew J. Friedland sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 97 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Andrew J. Friedland D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew J. Friedland sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2015 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Andrew J. Friedland is affiliated with Dartmouth College in the United States and specializes in Environmental Science. Their research spans several subfields, including Soil Science, Environmental Chemistry, Ecology, and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
  • Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
  • Wastewater Treatment and Reuse

Among recent publications associated with Friedland, several notable papers include:

  • Plants and earthworms control soil carbon and water quality trade-offs in turfgrass mesocosms, 2020, published in The Science of The Total Environment
  • Legacies of Nutrient Accumulation and Depletion in Residential Ecosystems, 2021, published in Ecosystems
  • Correction to: Building houses and managing lawns could limit yard soil carbon for centuries, 2020, published in Carbon Balance and Management
  • Index, 2020, published in Yale University Press eBooks

Friedland has collaborated frequently with several coauthors. Some of their frequent collaborators are:

  • Carol L. Folt
  • Morgan E. Peach
  • Caitlin Hicks Pries
  • Justin B. Richardson
  • Laura A. Ogden

Published work appears in various scholarly venues including:

  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Ecosystems
  • Carbon Balance and Management
  • Yale University Press eBooks

In addition to research papers, Friedland has contributed to book publications, notably:

  • Writing Successful Science Proposals, Second Edition, published by Yale University Press in 2020

Among recognitions, Friedland was named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2015.

Best Publications

  • Determination of soil exchangeable-cation loss and weathering rates using Sr isotopes

    Eric K. Miller;Joel D. Blum;Andrew J. Friedland

  • Winter damage to foliage as a factor in red spruce decline

    Andrew J. Friedland;Robert A. Gregory;Lauri Karenlampi;Arthur H. Johnson

  • Lead migration in forest soils: response to changing atmospheric inputs.

    Eric K. Miller;Andrew J. Friedland

  • Metal contamination of natural surface soils from long-range atmospheric transport: Existing and missing knowledge

    Eiliv Steinnes;Andrew J Friedland

  • Using stable and radioactive isotopes to trace atmospherically deposited Pb in montane forest soils.

    James M. Kaste;Andrew J. Friedland;Stefan Stürup

  • Trace metal content of the forest floor in the green mountains of Vermont: Spatial and temporal patterns

    Andrew J. Friedland;Arthur H. Johnson;Thomas G. Siccama

  • Role for heavy metals in forest decline indicated by phytochelatin measurements

    James E. Gawel;Beth A. Ahner;Andrew J. Friedland;François M. M. Morel

  • Detecting Change in Forest Floor Carbon

    Ruth D. Yanai;Stephen V. Stehman;Mary A. Arthur;Cindy E. Prescott

  • Atmospheric deposition to forests along an elevational gradient at Whiteface Mountain, NY, U.S.A.

    Eric K. Miller;Andrew J. Friedland;Edward A. Arons;Volker A. Mohnen

  • Nitrogen deposition, distribution and cycling in a subalpine spruce-fir forest in the Adirondacks, New York, USA

    Andrew J. Friedland;Eric K. Miller;John J. Battles;James F. Thorne

  • ACCUMULATION AND DEPLETION OF BASE CATIONS IN FOREST FLOORS IN THE NORTHEASTERN UNITED STATES

    R. D. Yanai;T. G. Siccama;M. A. Arthur;C. A. Federer

  • Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Lead Accumulation in the Forest Floor in the Northeastern United States

    A. H. Johnson;T. G. Siccama;A. J. Friedland

  • Nitrogen isotope variation of tree rings as a potential indicator of environmental change

    Simon R. Poulson;C.Page Chamberlain;Andrew J. Friedland

  • Lead distribution and fluxes in a high-elevation forest in northern Vermont

    A. J. Friedland;A. H. Johnson

  • Microclimatology of treeline spruce–fir forests in mountains of the northeastern United States

    Andrew D. Richardson;Xuhui Lee;Andrew J. Friedland

  • Direct canopy nitrogen uptake from 15N-labeled wet deposition by mature red spruce

    Richard L. Boyce;Andrew J. Friedland;C. Page Chamberlain;Simon R. Poulson

  • Atmospheric deposition to a high‐elevation forest at Whiteface Mountain, New York, USA

    Eric K. Miller;Jeanne A. Panek;Andrew J. Friedland;John Kadlecek

  • Winter desiccation and injury of subalpine red spruce

    Graham T. Herrick;Andrew J. Friedland

  • Threshold increases in soil lead and mercury from tropospheric deposition across an elevational gradient.

    Clare Stankwitz;James M. Kaste;Andrew J. Friedland

  • Red spruce (Picea rubens Sarg.) foliar chemistry in Northern Vermont and New York, USA

    A. J. Friedland;A. J. Friedland;A. J. Friedland;G. J. Hawley;G. J. Hawley;G. J. Hawley;R. A. Gregory;R. A. Gregory;R. A. Gregory

  • Trace Metal Profiles in the Forest Floor of New England1

    A. J. Friedland;A. H. Johnson;T. G. Siccama;D. L. Mader

  • Conventional intensive logging promotes loss of organic carbon from the mineral soil.

    Christopher Dean;James B. Kirkpatrick;Andrew J. Friedland

Frequent Co-Authors

Arthur H. Johnson
Arthur H. Johnson University of Pennsylvania
Thomas G. Siccama
Thomas G. Siccama Yale University
Benjamin C. Bostick
Benjamin C. Bostick Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
John J. Battles
John J. Battles University of California, Berkeley
Brian P. Jackson
Brian P. Jackson Dartmouth College
Ruth D. Yanai
Ruth D. Yanai SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry
Mary A. Arthur
Mary A. Arthur University of Kentucky
Carol L. Folt
Carol L. Folt Dartmouth College
Eiliv Steinnes
Eiliv Steinnes Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Joel D. Blum
Joel D. Blum University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens doors to diverse career paths that blend science, technology, and public policy. Many students explore Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to enhance their ability to analyze spatial data crucial for environmental management. Finding top-tier gis degree programs online can provide practical skills and flexible learning options for those interested in this tech-driven field.

For graduates aiming to influence environmental policy and lead sustainability initiatives, pursuing an advanced degree such as a Master of Public Administration is beneficial. Numerous students consider enrolling in the best online mpa programs to gain expertise in governance, public affairs, and resource management without compromising their work schedules.

Understanding societal behavior and its impact on the environment is equally important. Degrees like the best online bachelor degree in sociology offer insights into social dynamics, equipping students to tackle environmental justice and community engagement effectively.

For educators and professionals seeking to advance their careers without getting bogged down by lengthy dissertations, some opt for an edd without dissertation. These programs focus on practical, research-based knowledge ideal for those interested in environmental education and leadership roles.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew J. Friedland

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles