World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Earth Science 56 2469 2244 1035 918 201 9441

Benjamin C. Bostick publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Benjamin C. Bostick between 1993 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Benjamin C. Bostick published across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025, averaging 8.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2020. 27 of the 279 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2020. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 5 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 21 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 20 publications 2023: 21 publications 2024: 16 publications 2025: 11 publications
1993 2025

279 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Benjamin C. Bostick: publications per year, 1993 to 2025
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 1
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 1
2000 5
2001 4
2002 6
2003 7
2004 8
2005 13
2006 8
2007 7
2008 15
2009 6
2010 4
2011 7
2012 8
2013 4
2014 4
2015 6
2016 14
2017 11
2018 18
2019 14
2020 21
2021 18
2022 20
2023 21
2024 16
2025 11
Total 279
Download as CSV

Benjamin C. Bostick publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Benjamin C. Bostick sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 198–207 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

This scientist: 201 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278
88–97 376
98–107 404
108–117 484
118–127 540
128–137 557
138–147 491
148–157 495
158–167 458
168–177 490
178–187 414
188–197 401
198–207 333 201
208–217 292
218–227 290
228–237 262
238–247 243
248–257 208
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

Benjamin C. Bostick D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Benjamin C. Bostick sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 144
31 215
32 278
33 379
34 366
35 372
36 389
37 366
38 344
39 349
40 296
41 289
42 277
43 279
44 248
45 257
46 212
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183
51 178
52 182
53 178
54 163
55 117
56 163 56
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Benjamin C. Bostick is affiliated with the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with a strong emphasis on issues related to environmental chemistry, health, toxicology, mutagenesis, and pollution. They have contributed to the understanding of arsenic contamination, heavy metal exposure, and environmental health disparities through extensive study of groundwater and related geochemical processes.

Their recent scholarly work includes publications such as:

  • Arsenic contamination of Bangladesh aquifers exacerbated by clay layers, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Spatial and temporal evolution of groundwater arsenic contamination in the Red River delta, Vietnam: Interplay of mobilisation and retardation processes, 2020, The Science of The Total Environment
  • Nationwide geospatial analysis of county racial and ethnic composition and public drinking water arsenic and uranium, 2022, Nature Communications
  • Associations between private well water and community water supply arsenic concentrations in the conterminous United States, 2021, The Science of The Total Environment
  • Lead (Pb) concentrations and speciation in residential soils from an urban community impacted by multiple legacy sources, 2021, Journal of Hazardous Materials

Bostick's frequent co-authors include:

  • Alexander van Geen
  • Brian J. Mailloux
  • Anne E. Nigra
  • Athena Nghiem
  • Ana Navas-Acién

The scientist's work has appeared prominently in publication venues such as:

  • Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • ISEE Conference Abstracts
  • The Science of The Total Environment

Bostick's research spans several main fields and subfields, which include:

  • Environmental Science
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
  • Pollution
  • Geochemistry and Petrology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Main topics covered in their body of work include:

  • Arsenic contamination and mitigation
  • Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
  • Heavy metals in environment
  • Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
  • Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry
  • Mine drainage and remediation techniques
  • Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Best Publications

  • Arsenic(III) Oxidation and Arsenic(V) Adsorption Reactions on Synthetic Birnessite

    Bruce A. Manning;Scott E. Fendorf;Benjamin Bostick;Donald L. Suarez

  • Arsenite sorption on troilite (FeS) and pyrite (FeS2)

    Benjamin C Bostick;Scott Fendorf

  • Iron solubility driven by speciation in dust sources to the ocean

    Andrew W. Schroth;John Crusius;Edward R. Sholkovitz;Benjamin C. Bostick

  • Cesium adsorption on clay minerals: an EXAFS spectroscopic investigation.

    Benjamin C. Bostick;Murthy A. Vairavamurthy;K. G. Karthikeyan;Jon Chorover

  • Kinetics of Arsenate Reduction by Dissolved Sulfide

    Elizabeth A. Rochette;Benjamin C. Bostick;Guangchao Li;Scott Fendorf

  • Differential adsorption of molybdate and tetrathiomolybdate on pyrite (FeS2).

    Benjamin N. C. Bostick;Scott Fendorf;George R. Helz

  • Retardation of arsenic transport through a Pleistocene aquifer

    Alexander van Geen;Benjamín C. Bostick;Pham Thi Kim Trang;Vi Mai Lan

  • Evidence for Microbial Fe(III) Reduction in Anoxic, Mining-Impacted Lake Sediments (Lake Coeur d'Alene, Idaho)

    David E. Cummings;Anthony W. March;Benjamin Bostick;Stefan Spring

  • Landfill-stimulated iron reduction and arsenic release at the Coakley Superfund Site (NH).

    Jamie L. deLemos;Benjamin C. Bostick;Carl E. Renshaw;Stefan StÜrup

  • Changes in iron, sulfur, and arsenic speciation associated with bacterial sulfate reduction in ferrihydrite-rich systems.

    Samantha L. Saalfield;Benjamin C. Bostick

  • Seasonal fluctuations in zinc speciation within a contaminated wetland.

    Bostick Bc;Hansel Cm;La Force Mj;Fendorf S

  • Arsenic migration to deep groundwater in Bangladesh influenced by adsorption and water demand

    K. A. Radloff;Y. Zheng;Y. Zheng;H. A. Michael;M. Stute;M. Stute

  • Short-term soil mixing quantified with fallout radionuclides

    James M. Kaste;Arjun M. Heimsath;Benjamin C. Bostick

  • Inhibition of bacterially promoted uranium reduction: ferric (Hydr)oxides as competitive electron acceptors.

    B. Wielinga;B. Bostick;C. M. Hansel;R. F. Rosenzweig

  • Thermal history of the 3.5–3.2 Ga Onverwacht and Fig Tree Groups, Barberton greenstone belt, South Africa, inferred by Raman microspectroscopy of carbonaceous material

    Michael M. Tice;Benjamin C. Bostick;Donald R. Lowe

  • Arsenite retention mechanisms within estuarine sediments of pescadero, CA

    Benjamin C. Bostick;Cynthia Chen;Scott Fendorf

  • Effect of groundwater iron and phosphate on the efficacy of arsenic removal by iron-amended BioSand filters.

    Hannah Chiew;M.L. Sampson;Sokhan Huch;Sreymom Ken

  • Identifying and Quantifying the Intermediate Processes during Nitrate-Dependent Iron(II) Oxidation.

    James Jamieson;James Jamieson;Henning Prommer;Henning Prommer;Anna H. Kaksonen;Anna H. Kaksonen;Jing Sun;Jing Sun

  • Megacity pumping and preferential flow threaten groundwater quality.

    Mahfuzur R. Khan;Mohammad Koneshloo;Peter Knappett;Kazi Matin Ahmed

  • Advection of surface-derived organic carbon fuels microbial reduction in Bangladesh groundwater

    Brian J. Mailloux;Elizabeth Trembath-Reichert;Jennifer Cheung;Marlena Watson

  • In situ analysis of thioarsenite complexes in neutral to alkaline arsenic sulphide solutions

    B. C. Bostick;B. C. Bostick;S. Fendorf;G. E. Brown

  • Uranyl Surface Complexes Formed on Subsurface Media from DOE Facilities

    Benjamin C. Bostick;Scott Fendorf;Mark O. Barnett;Phillip M. Jardine

Frequent Co-Authors

Brian J. Mailloux
Brian J. Mailloux Barnard College
Kazi Matin Ahmed
Kazi Matin Ahmed University of Dhaka
Alexander van Geen
Alexander van Geen Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Scott Fendorf
Scott Fendorf Stanford University
Peter Schlosser
Peter Schlosser Arizona State University
Martin Stute
Martin Stute Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Henning Prommer
Henning Prommer University of Western Australia
Yan Zheng
Yan Zheng Southern University of Science and Technology
Holly A. Michael
Holly A. Michael University of Delaware

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science opens doors to a variety of interdisciplinary fields, many of which offer flexible online learning options. For veterans interested in expanding their skillsets, programs like the online Spanish bachelor degree for veterans provide valuable language skills that complement geological research in diverse regions.

Creatives can also pursue an MFA online to specialize in environmental communication or scientific illustration, bridging the gap between scientific data and public understanding.

On the management side, Earth Science graduates may advance into organizational roles by enrolling in online masters programs in human resource management, crucial for overseeing teams in research institutions or environmental agencies.

Additionally, for seniors seeking to pivot their careers or acquire new qualifications quickly, there are one year degree programs for seniors that provide accelerated learning opportunities without compromising quality or flexibility.

Best Scientists Citing Benjamin C. Bostick

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles