World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Navid Mostoufi

Navid Mostoufi

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 44 5790 5585 78 78 290 7946

Navid Mostoufi publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Navid Mostoufi between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Navid Mostoufi published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 11.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 31 publications in 2013. 25 of the 319 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 31. Peak 31 publications in 2013. 1999: 3 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 20 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 31 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 14 publications
1999 2025

319 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Navid Mostoufi: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 3
2000 2
2001 3
2002 0
2003 0
2004 10
2005 11
2006 3
2007 12
2008 10
2009 14
2010 15
2011 20
2012 20
2013 31
2014 17
2015 15
2016 14
2017 16
2018 15
2019 15
2020 11
2021 16
2022 14
2023 7
2024 11
2025 14
Total 319
Download as CSV

Navid Mostoufi publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Navid Mostoufi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 288–297 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 290 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203 290
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Navid Mostoufi D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Navid Mostoufi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310 44
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Navid Mostoufi is affiliated with the University of Tehran in Iran and has contributed extensively to the field of engineering, with a focus on various subfields such as computational mechanics, mechanical engineering, control and systems engineering, biomedical engineering, and ocean engineering.

The primary focus of their work spans several research topics, including:

  • Granular flow and fluidized beds
  • Mineral processing and grinding
  • Particle dynamics in fluid flows
  • Cyclone separators and fluid dynamics
  • Fault detection and control systems
  • Fluid dynamics and mixing
  • Spectroscopy and chemometric analyses

Mostoufi has authored a number of recent papers that reflect a diverse range of interests within chemical and mechanical engineering disciplines. Notable publications include:

  • "Kinetics of leaching: a review," 2020, published in Reviews in Chemical Engineering
  • "Review and implementation of CFD-DEM applied to chemical process systems," 2020, published in Chemical Engineering Science
  • "Thermo-mechanical stability of axially graded Rayleigh pipes," 2020, published in Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines
  • "Vibrational analysis of pipes based on the drift-flux two-phase flow model," 2022, published in Ocean Engineering
  • "Effect of inter-particle forces on solids mixing in fluidized beds," 2022, published in Powder Technology

The scientist frequently collaborates with several coauthors including Reza Zarghami, Rahmat Sotudeh-Gharebagh, Saman Kazemi, Alkis Constantinides, and Hooman Ziaei-Halimejani.

Common venues for Mostoufi's publications are:

  • Powder Technology
  • Process Safety and Environmental Protection
  • Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
  • Particuology
  • Chemical Engineering Science

Navid Mostoufi's work reflects a significant engagement with systems involving granular materials, fluid dynamics, and chemical processes, contributing across several engineering subdomains while maintaining an interdisciplinary approach. The research spans both computational and applied topics relevant to modern engineering challenges.

Best Publications

  • Numerical Methods for Chemical Engineers With Matlab Applications

    Alkis Constantinides;Navid Mostoufi

  • Kinetics of leaching: a review

    Fariborz Faraji;Fariborz Faraji;Amirhossein Alizadeh;Fereshteh Rashchi;Navid Mostoufi

  • Coupled CFD-DEM Modeling: Formulation, Implementation and Application to Multiphase Flows

    Hamid Reza Norouzi;Reza Zarghami;Rahmat Sotudeh-Gharebagh;Navid Mostoufi

  • Leaching of vanadium from LD converter slag using sulfuric acid

    M. Aarabi-Karasgani;F. Rashchi;N. Mostoufi;E. Vahidi

  • A shrinking particle - shrinking core model for leaching of a zinc ore containing silica

    Vida Safari;Gilnaz Arzpeyma;Fereshteh Rashchi;Navid Mostoufi

  • Review and implementation of CFD-DEM applied to chemical process systems

    Shahab Golshan;Shahab Golshan;Rahmat Sotudeh-Gharebagh;Reza Zarghami;Navid Mostoufi

  • Characterization of dynamic gas–solid distribution in fluidized beds

    Heping Cui;Navid Mostoufi;Jamal Chaouki

  • Local solid mixing in gas–solid fluidized beds

    Navid Mostoufi;Jamal Chaouki

  • CFD simulation of fluidized bed reactors for polyolefin production – A review

    Mohammad Jakir Hossain Khan;Mohamed Azlan Hussain;Zahra Mansourpour;Navid Mostoufi

  • Investigation of heat transfer between a horizontal tube and gas–solid fluidized bed

    Nima Masoumifard;Navid Mostoufi;Ali-Asghar Hamidi;Rahmat Sotudeh-Gharebagh

  • Kinetic modeling of oxidative coupling of methane over Mn/Na2WO4/SiO2 catalyst

    Mahdi Daneshpayeh;Abbasali Khodadadi;Navid Mostoufi;Yadolah Mortazavi

  • Flow structure of the solids in gas–solid fluidized beds

    Navid Mostoufi;Jamal Chaouki

  • Modeling of fluidized bed reactor of ethylene polymerization

    Mahmood Alizadeh;Navid Mostoufi;Saeed Pourmahdian;Rahmat Sotudeh-Gharebagh

  • Characterization of solids mixing patterns in bubbling fluidized beds

    H.R. Norouzi;N. Mostoufi;Z. Mansourpour;R. Sotudeh-Gharebagh

  • COMPARISON BETWEEN DIFFERENT MODELS FOR RHEOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF ACTIVATED SLUDGE

    A. H. Khalili Garakani;N. Mostoufi;F. Sadeghi;M. Hosseinzadeh

  • A Comparison of Two- and Single-Phase Models for Fluidized-Bed Reactors

    Navid Mostoufi;Heping Cui;Jamal Chaouki

  • Dynamics of two-phase flow in vertical pipes

    Ali Ebrahimi-Mamaghani;Rahmat Sotudeh-Gharebagh;Reza Zarghami;Navid Mostoufi

  • TWO-PHASE MODELING OF A GAS PHASE POLYETHYLENE FLUIDIZED BED REACTOR

    Ali Kiashemshaki;Navid Mostoufi;Rahmat Sotudeh-Gharebagh

  • Analyze and control fouling in an airlift membrane bioreactor: CFD simulation and experimental studies

    Amirhossein Khalili-Garakani;Mohammad Reza Mehrnia;Navid Mostoufi;Mohammad Hossein Sarrafzadeh

  • A hybrid GA–SQP optimization technique for determination of kinetic parameters of hydrogenation reactions

    Behrang Mansoornejad;Navid Mostoufi;Farhang Jalali-Farahani

  • Numerical Methods for Chemical Engineers with MATLAB Applications with Cdrom

    Alkis Constantinides;Navid Mostoufi

Frequent Co-Authors

Jamal Chaouki
Jamal Chaouki Polytechnique Montréal
Mohd Azlan Hussain
Mohd Azlan Hussain University of Malaya
Abbas Ali Khodadadi
Abbas Ali Khodadadi University of Tehran
Farouq S. Mjalli
Farouq S. Mjalli Sultan Qaboos University
Yadollah Mortazavi
Yadollah Mortazavi University of Tehran
Seyyed Mohammad Mousavi
Seyyed Mohammad Mousavi Tarbiat Modares University
Seyed Saeid Mohtasebi
Seyed Saeid Mohtasebi University of Tehran
Frans D. Tichelaar
Frans D. Tichelaar Delft University of Technology
Seyed Abbas Shojaosadati
Seyed Abbas Shojaosadati Tarbiat Modares University
Ezzat Chan Abdullah
Ezzat Chan Abdullah University of Technology Malaysia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring engineering and technology in the USA opens the door to various interdisciplinary career paths. Many students and professionals are now pursuing online degrees to advance their expertise and job prospects while balancing work and personal commitments.

For those interested in leadership roles, affordable online mba programs no gmat offer a flexible way to gain business management skills, with the added benefit of skipping standardized tests.

If you want to specialize in overseeing technical projects, consider a project management degree online accredited. Such programs equip graduates with skills to guide projects from concept to completion in tech-driven industries.

Tech-savvy learners interested in property markets can also benefit from real estate degree programs. These online offerings connect engineering knowledge with real-world real estate practices.

Finally, the digital experience is paramount in technology today. A ui ux design bachelor's degree online merges creativity and tech, preparing students for careers at the intersection of design and engineering.

Explore these pathways to expand your expertise and meet the evolving needs of the technology sector.

Best Scientists Citing Navid Mostoufi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles