World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
57
Citations
11101
World Ranking
1448
National Ranking
378

Jack E. Staub publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jack E. Staub sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 223 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Jack E. Staub D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jack E. Staub sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Gene
  • Genetics
  • Botany

Jack E. Staub spends much of his time researching Genetics, Cucumis, Genetic marker, RAPD and Germplasm. His Cucumis research is classified as research in Botany. The study incorporates disciplines such as SNP, Chloroplast DNA, Nucleic acid amplification technique, Microsatellite and Locus in addition to Genetic marker.

His work deals with themes such as Genetic distance and Inbred strain, which intersect with RAPD. Within one scientific family, Jack E. Staub focuses on topics pertaining to Genetic diversity under Germplasm, and may sometimes address concerns connected to Allele, Allele frequency and Genetic variability. His Synteny study incorporates themes from Plant disease resistance and Whole genome sequencing.

His most cited work include:

  • The genome of the cucumber, Cucumis sativus L. (1012 citations)
  • Genetic Markers, Map Construction, and Their Application in Plant Breeding (338 citations)
  • An Integrated Genetic and Cytogenetic Map of the Cucumber Genome (205 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Jack E. Staub mainly focuses on Cucumis, Botany, Genetics, Germplasm and Horticulture. His studies in Cucumis integrate themes in fields like Genetic diversity, Introgression, Quantitative trait locus, Backcrossing and Melon. His Botany research incorporates elements of RAPD and Orange.

His study in Genetics concentrates on Genetic marker, Gene mapping, Genetic linkage, Linkage and Locus. His Genetic marker research includes elements of Microsatellite and Molecular marker. The concepts of his Germplasm study are interwoven with issues in Genetic distance, Genetic variation and Heritability.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Cucumis (76.47%)
  • Botany (54.55%)
  • Genetics (42.25%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2009-2017)?

  • Cucumis (76.47%)
  • Botany (54.55%)
  • Germplasm (33.16%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Jack E. Staub mainly investigates Cucumis, Botany, Germplasm, Backcrossing and Genetic distance. Jack E. Staub has researched Cucumis in several fields, including Genetic marker, Molecular marker, Genetic diversity and Introgression. His Molecular marker study is concerned with the field of Genetics as a whole.

His biological study focuses on Locus. His studies deal with areas such as Genomic data, Marker-assisted selection and Orange as well as Botany. His Germplasm research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Cultivar and Melon.

Between 2009 and 2017, his most popular works were:

  • A consensus linkage map for molecular markers and Quantitative Trait Loci associated with economically important traits in melon (Cucumis melo L.) (136 citations)
  • A consensus linkage map for molecular markers and Quantitative Trait Loci associated with economically important traits in melon (Cucumis melo L.) (136 citations)
  • An Extended Intervarietal Microsatellite Linkage Map of Cucumber, Cucumis sativus L. (41 citations)

Best Publications

  • The genome of the cucumber, Cucumis sativus L.

    Sanwen Huang;Ruiqiang Li;Zhonghua Zhang;Li Li

  • Genetic Markers, Map Construction, and Their Application in Plant Breeding

    Jack E. Staub;Felix C. Serquen;Manju Gupta

  • An Integrated Genetic and Cytogenetic Map of the Cucumber Genome

    Yi Ren;Zhonghua Zhang;Jinhua Liu;Jack E. Staub

  • Identification of a 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid synthase gene linked to the female (F) locus that enhances female sex expression in cucumber

    T Trebitsh;J E Staub;S D O'Neill

  • Linkages among RFLP, RAPD, isozyme, disease-resistance, and morphological markers in narrow and wide crosses of cucumber.

    A. Dijkhuizen;V. Meglic;J. E. Staub;M. J. Havey

  • Genetic mapping and QTL analysis of horticultural traits in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) using recombinant inbred lines

    G. Fazio;J. E. Staub;M. R. Stevens

  • A consensus linkage map for molecular markers and Quantitative Trait Loci associated with economically important traits in melon (Cucumis melo L.)

    Aurora Diaz;Mohamed Fergany;Mohamed Fergany;Gelsomina Formisano;Peio Ziarsolo

  • Successful interspecific hybridization between Cucumis sativus L. and C. hystrix Chakr

    Jin-feng Chen;Jack E. Staub;Yosuke Tashiro;Shiro Isshiki

  • The development and evaluation of consensus chloroplast primer pairs that possess highly variable sequence regions in a diverse array of plant taxa.

    Sang-Min Chung;Jack E. Staub

  • Mapping and QTL analysis of horticultural traits in a narrow cross in cucumber ( Cucumis sativus L.) using random-amplified polymorphic DNA markers

    Felix C. Serquen;J Bacher;JE Staub

  • Genetic variation in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) as assessed by random amplified polymorphic DNA1

    Thomas Horejsi;Jack E. Staub

  • Comparative analysis of cultivated melon groups (Cucumis melo L.) using random amplified polymorphic DNA and simple sequence repeat markers.

    Jack E. Staub;Yael Danin-Poleg;Gennaro Fazio;Thomas Horejsi

  • Comparative analysis of genetic diversity in Indian bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.) using RAPD and ISSR markers for developing crop improvement strategies

    T.K. Behera;T.K. Behera;A.K. Singh;Jack.E. Staub

  • Sources of potential errors in the application of random amplified polymorphic DNAs in cucumber

    Jack Staub;Jeffery Bacher;Karl Poetter

  • Simple sequence repeats in Cucumis mapping and map merging

    Y Danin-Poleg;N Reis;S Baudracco-Arnas;M Pitrat

  • RFLP variation and genetic relationships in cultivated cucumber

    Arian Dijkhuizen;Wayne C. Kennard;Michael J. Havey;Jack E. Staub

  • Bitter gourd: botany, horticulture, breeding

    Tusar K. Behera;Snigdha Behera;L.K. Bharathi;K. Joseph John

  • Genetic diversity in Cucumis sativus L. assessed by variation at 18 allozyme coding loci

    L. D. Knerr;J. E. Staub;D. J. Holder;B. P. May

  • Towards an expanded and integrated linkage map of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.).

    J M Bradeen;J E Staub;C Wye;R Antonise

  • Comparison of isozyme and random amplified polymorphic DNA data for determining intraspecific variation in Cucumis

    Jack E. Staub;Jodie Box;Vladimir Meglic;Thomas F. Horejsi

  • Detection of QTL for yield-related traits using recombinant inbred lines derived from exotic and elite US Western Shipping melon germplasm.

    Juan E Zalapa;Jack E Staub;J D McCreight;S M Chung

  • Development and Characterization of PCR Markers in Cucumber

    Gennaro Fazio;Jack E. Staub;Sang Min Chung

  • Diversity among melon landraces (Cucumis melo L.) from Greece and their genetic relationships with other melon germplasm of diverse origins

    Jack E. Staub;Ana I. López-Sesé;Nikolaos Fanourakis

Frequent Co-Authors

Philipp W. Simon
Philipp W. Simon University of Wisconsin–Madison
Juan Zalapa
Juan Zalapa University of Wisconsin–Madison
Todd C. Wehner
Todd C. Wehner North Carolina State University
Nurit Katzir
Nurit Katzir Agricultural Research Organization
Gennaro Fazio
Gennaro Fazio Agricultural Research Service
Sanwen Huang
Sanwen Huang Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Michael J. Havey
Michael J. Havey University of Wisconsin–Madison
Bingyan Xie
Bingyan Xie Chinese Academy of Inspection and Quarantine
Lars Bolund
Lars Bolund Aarhus University
Zhangjun Fei
Zhangjun Fei Cornell University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Jack E. Staub

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles