World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Canada
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
71
Citations
24224
World Ranking
1756
National Ranking
894

William Buxton publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William Buxton sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 163 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

William Buxton D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William Buxton sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Computer Science in Canada Leader Award
  • 2008 - ACM Fellow For contributions to the field of human-computer interaction.
  • 1958 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

William Buxton is affiliated with Microsoft in the United States. Their primary area of research lies within computer science, with a significant focus on human-computer interaction. The scholar has contributed to multiple subfields including cognitive neuroscience, social psychology, sociology and political science, and computer vision and pattern recognition.

The research topics William Buxton has engaged with include virtual reality applications and impacts, interactive and immersive displays, tactile and sensory interactions, gaze tracking and assistive technology, innovative human-technology interaction, team dynamics and performance, and conferences and exhibitions management.

Among Buxton's recent publications are two papers in the Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction: "Perspectives: Creating Inclusive and Equitable Hybrid Meeting Experiences" published in 2023, and "Hybridge: Bridging Spatiality for Inclusive and Equitable Hybrid Meetings" published in 2024.

Frequent collaborators in their research efforts include John Tang, Kori Inkpen, Sasa Junuzovic, Andrew D. Wilson, and Sean Rintel. These coauthors have worked alongside Buxton on at least two publications each.

The publication venues most associated with William Buxton are primarily Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, with two papers published there.

William Buxton has been recognized as an ACM Fellow for contributions to human-computer interaction in 2008. In addition, Buxton is a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) since 1958.

Best Publications

  • Toolglass and magic lenses: the see-through interface

    Eric A. Bier;Maureen C. Stone;Ken Pier;William Buxton

  • Bricks: laying the foundations for graspable user interfaces

    George W. Fitzmaurice;Hiroshi Ishii;William A. S. Buxton

  • A multi-touch three dimensional touch-sensitive tablet

    SK Lee;William Buxton;K. C. Smith

  • Extending Fitts' law to two-dimensional tasks

    I. Scott MacKenzie;William Buxton

  • A study in two-handed input

    W. Buxton;B. Myers

  • Usability evaluation considered harmful (some of the time)

    Saul Greenberg;Bill Buxton

  • A comparison of input devices in element pointing and dragging tasks

    I. Scott MacKenzie;Abigail Sellen;William A. S. Buxton

  • Issues and techniques in touch-sensitive tablet input

    W. Buxton;R. Hill;P. Rowley

  • User learning and performance with marking menus

    Gordon Kurtenbach;William Buxton

  • A taxonomy of See-Through Tools

    Eric A. Bier;Maureen C. Stone;Ken Fishkin;William A. S. Buxton

  • Realizing a video environment: EuroPARC's RAVE system

    William Gaver;Thomas Moran;Allan MacLean;Lennart Lövstrand

  • Experiences in the use of a media space

    Marilyn M. Mantei;Ronald M. Baecker;Abigail J. Sellen;William A. S. Buxton

  • The limits of expert performance using hierarchic marking menus

    Gordon Kurtenbach;William Buxton

  • User interface having movable sheet with click-through tools

    Eric A. Bier;William A. S. Buxton

  • A three-state model of graphical input

    William Buxton

  • Two-handed input in a compound task

    Paul Kabbash;William Buxton;Abigail Sellen

  • Lexical and pragmatic considerations of input structures

    William Buxton

  • Pen + touch = new tools

    Ken Hinckley;Koji Yatani;Michel Pahud;Nicole Coddington

  • An empirical evaluation of graspable user interfaces: towards specialized, space-multiplexed input

    George W. Fitzmaurice;William Buxton

  • Graspable user interfaces

    William Buxton;George W. Fitzmaurice

Frequent Co-Authors

Ronald M. Baecker
Ronald M. Baecker University of Toronto
Saul Greenberg
Saul Greenberg University of Calgary
Jonathan Grudin
Jonathan Grudin University of Washington
Eric A. Bier
Eric A. Bier Palo Alto Research Center
Gordon Kurtenbach
Gordon Kurtenbach Autodesk (United States)
George Fitzmaurice
George Fitzmaurice Autodesk (United States)
I. Scott MacKenzie
I. Scott MacKenzie York University
Maureen Stone
Maureen Stone Tableau Software (United States)
Abigail Sellen
Abigail Sellen Microsoft (United States)
Shumin Zhai
Shumin Zhai Google (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees can open a world of possibilities for aspiring Computer Science students. Many students wonder, "what masters program should I do?" when choosing the next step in their education. The right master’s can boost career options in fields like artificial intelligence, data science, and cybersecurity.

For those looking to start their journey, earning an online associate degree in Computer Science is a flexible and fast way to gain foundational skills. This degree can lead directly to entry-level tech jobs or serve as a stepping stone to a bachelor’s degree.

Affordability is a concern for many students. Luckily, there are affordable online courses and programs that help you build your skills without a heavy financial burden.

Admissions standards vary, and some institutions are more accessible than others. If you are concerned about your academic record, consider a college that accepts low GPA. These colleges provide an inclusive environment and help more students start their tech careers.

Best Scientists Citing William Buxton

Trending Scientists