World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
41
Citations
10050
World Ranking
8663
National Ranking
3716

Maureen Stone publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maureen Stone sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 184 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Maureen Stone D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maureen Stone sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Maureen Stone is affiliated with Tableau Software in the United States and has an interdisciplinary research profile spanning computer science and medicine. Their work integrates advanced computational methods with medical imaging and speech processing technologies.

Their recent publications demonstrate a focus on visualization, image translation, and imaging techniques. Notable papers include:

  • "Rainbow Colormaps Are Not All Bad" (2023) published in IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications
  • "Attentive continuous generative self-training for unsupervised domain adaptive medical image translation" (2023) in Medical Image Analysis
  • "Mixing Linters with GUIs: A Color Palette Design Probe" (2024) in IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
  • "Prospective motion detection and re-acquisition in diffusion MRI using a phase image-based method-Application to brain and tongue imaging" (2021) in Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
  • "Validation of Muscle Fiber Architecture of the Human Tongue Revealed by Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Histology Verification" (2022) in Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research

Their research covers diverse fields, with primary emphases on computer science and medicine. Within these fields, subfields of study include:

  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Signal Processing
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Physiology

Key topics addressed in Maureen Stone's work encompass:

  • Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Speech and Audio Processing
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Voice and Speech Disorders
  • Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
  • Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research

Frequent coauthors collaborating on these areas are:

  • Jerry L. Prince
  • Fangxu Xing
  • Jiachen Zhuo
  • Georges El Fakhri
  • Jonghye Woo

Maureen Stone has published extensively in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Medical Image Analysis, and IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics. ArXiv stands out as a frequent publication venue for their work.

Best Publications

  • Toolglass and magic lenses: the see-through interface

    Eric A. Bier;Maureen C. Stone;Ken Pier;William Buxton

  • A taxonomy of See-Through Tools

    Eric A. Bier;Maureen C. Stone;Ken Fishkin;William A. S. Buxton

  • User-directed method for operating on an object-based model data structure through a second contextual image

    Maureen C. Stone;Eric A. Bier;Anthony DeRose

  • Fluid interaction for high resolution wall-size displays

    François Guimbretière;Maureen Stone;Terry Winograd

  • The movable filter as a user interface tool

    Maureen C. Stone;Ken Fishkin;Eric A. Bier

  • Zoomorphic computer user interface

    Kenneth P Fishkin;Anuj Uday Gujar;David Goldberg;Beverly L Harrison

  • Color gamut mapping and the printing of digital color images

    Maureen C. Stone;William B. Cowan;John C. Beatty

  • Automatic contour tracking in ultrasound images

    Min Li;Chandra Kambhamettu;Maureen Stone

  • iStuff: a physical user interface toolkit for ubiquitous computing environments

    Rafael Ballagas;Meredith Ringel;Maureen Stone;Jan Borchers

  • PointRight: experience with flexible input redirection in interactive workspaces

    Brad Johanson;Greg Hutchins;Terry Winograd;Maureen Stone

  • Snap-dragging

    Eric A. Bier;Maureen C. Stone

  • Enhanced dynamic queries via movable filters

    Ken Fishkin;Maureen C. Stone

  • Curve-fitting with piecewise parametric cubics

    Michael Plass;Maureen Stone

  • A taxonomy of see-through tools

    Eric A. Bier;Maureen C. Stone;Ken Fishkin;William Buxton

  • Development of a silent speech interface driven by ultrasound and optical images of the tongue and lips

    Thomas Hueber;Elie-Laurent Benaroya;Gérard Chollet;Bruce Denby

  • A Field Guide to Digital Color

    Maureen Stone

  • Selecting semantically-resonant colors for data visualization

    Sharon Lin;Julie Fortuna;Chinmay Kulkarni;Maureen Stone

  • Color naming models for color selection, image editing and palette design

    Jeffrey Heer;Maureen Stone

  • Method and apparatus for operating on the model data structure of an image to produce human perceptible output using a viewing operation region having explicit multiple regions

    Maureen C. Stone;Kenneth P. Fishkin;Eric A. Bier

  • Multimodal Registration via Mutual Information Incorporating Geometric and Spatial Context

    Jonghye Woo;Maureen Stone;Jerry L. Prince

  • Affective Color in Visualization

    Lyn Bartram;Abhisekh Patra;Maureen Stone

  • Fluid interaction with high-resolution wall-size displays

    Unknown

  • Eigentongue Feature Extraction for an Ultrasound-Based Silent Speech Interface

    T. Hueber;G. Aversano;G. Chollet;B. Denby

  • A geometric characterization of parametric cubic curves

    Maureen C. Stone;Tony D. DeRose

  • Automatic extraction and tracking of the tongue contours

    Y.S. Akgul;C. Kambhamettu;M. Stone

Frequent Co-Authors

Eric A. Bier
Eric A. Bier Palo Alto Research Center
Kenneth P. Fishkin
Kenneth P. Fishkin Google (United States)
Jerry L. Prince
Jerry L. Prince Johns Hopkins University
William Buxton
William Buxton Microsoft (United States)
Gérard Dreyfus
Gérard Dreyfus ESPCI Paris
Roy Want
Roy Want Google (United States)
Elizabeth D. Mynatt
Elizabeth D. Mynatt Northeastern University
Jock D. Mackinlay
Jock D. Mackinlay Tableau Software (United States)
David E. Goldberg
David E. Goldberg University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Chandra Kambhamettu
Chandra Kambhamettu University of Delaware

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Computer Science opens doors to a range of related online programs and career pathways. Many students often consider complementing their studies with fields such as mechanical engineering, physics, or data science. For example, if you’re interested in broad technical skills beyond computer science, consider the cheapest online master’s mechanical engineering degrees to broaden your career prospects in engineering.

For those passionate about foundational sciences or considering roles in research and development, a bachelor of science in physics online can offer a flexible study path. Data science also complements computer science perfectly—explore the cheapest data science degree options to jumpstart a career in analytics or artificial intelligence.

Lastly, if your interests lie in hardware or embedded systems, an online bachelor’s in electrical engineering could be ideal. These related programs provide versatile skills and are accessible through affordable online options—helping you tailor your education to your unique goals in the tech sector.

Best Scientists Citing Maureen Stone

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles