World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
83
Citations
20106
World Ranking
918
National Ranking
498

Scott E. Hudson publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott E. Hudson sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 279 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Scott E. Hudson D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott E. Hudson sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Scott E. Hudson is affiliated with Carnegie Mellon University in the United States and works primarily in the field of Computer Science.

Their research spans several subfields, including Human-Computer Interaction, Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, and Computer Science Applications.

Key topics covered in their work include:

  • Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Educational Games and Gamification
  • Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Interactive and Immersive Displays
  • Persona Design and Applications
  • Teaching and Learning Programming

Scott E. Hudson has published extensively in a range of academic venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
  • Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
  • Science
  • Journal of the Learning Sciences

Recent papers published by the scientist include:

  • Active Learning is About More Than Hands-On: A Mixed-Reality AI System to Support STEM Education (2020), International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Active learning: "Hands-on" meets "minds-on" (2021), Science
  • Enabling Hand Gesture Customization on Wrist-Worn Devices (2022), CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
  • Maptimizer: Using Optimization to Tailor Tactile Maps to Users Needs (2022), CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
  • Intelligent science exhibits: Transforming hands-on exhibits into mixed-reality learning experiences (2022), Journal of the Learning Sciences

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Nesra Yannier
  • Kenneth R. Koedinger
  • Megan Hofmann
  • Kelly Mack
  • Jennifer Mankoff

Best Publications

  • Past, present, and future of user interface software tools

    Brad Myers;Scott E. Hudson;Randy Pausch

  • Making computers easier for older adults to use: area cursors and sticky icons

    Aileen Worden;Nef Walker;Krishna Bharat;Scott Hudson

  • Techniques for addressing fundamental privacy and disruption tradeoffs in awareness support systems

    Scott E. Hudson;Ian Smith

  • Predicting human interruptibility with sensors

    James Fogarty;Scott E. Hudson;Christopher G. Atkeson;Daniel Avrahami

  • Printed optics: 3D printing of embedded optical elements for interactive devices

    Karl Willis;Eric Brockmeyer;Scott Hudson;Ivan Poupyrev

  • Predicting human interruptibility with sensors: a Wizard of Oz feasibility study

    Scott Hudson;James Fogarty;Christopher Atkeson;Daniel Avrahami

  • PaperLink: a technique for hyperlinking from real paper to electronic content

    Toshifumi Arai;Dietmar Aust;Scott E. Hudson

  • Abracadabra: wireless, high-precision, and unpowered finger input for very small mobile devices

    Chris Harrison;Scott E. Hudson

  • Sensing from the basement: a feasibility study of unobtrusive and low-cost home activity recognition

    James Fogarty;Carolyn Au;Scott E. Hudson

  • TapSense: enhancing finger interaction on touch surfaces

    Chris Harrison;Julia Schwarz;Scott E. Hudson

  • Providing dynamically changeable physical buttons on a visual display

    Chris Harrison;Scott E. Hudson

  • Haptic pen: a tactile feedback stylus for touch screens

    Johnny C. Lee;Paul H. Dietz;Darren Leigh;William S. Yerazunis

  • Feasibility and pragmatics of classifying working memory load with an electroencephalograph

    David Grimes;Desney S. Tan;Scott E. Hudson;Pradeep Shenoy

  • Scratch input: creating large, inexpensive, unpowered and mobile finger input surfaces

    Chris Harrison;Scott E. Hudson

  • WebThumb: interaction techniques for small-screen browsers

    Jacob O. Wobbrock;Jodi Forlizzi;Scott E. Hudson;Brad A. Myers

  • The information percolator: ambient information display in a decorative object

    Jeremy M. Heiner;Scott E. Hudson;Kenichiro Tanaka

  • Visualizing complex hypermedia networks through multiple hierarchical views

    Sougata Mukherjea;James D. Foley;Scott Hudson

  • Cactis: a self-adaptive, concurrent implementation of an object-oriented database management system

    Scott E. Hudson;Roger King

  • Interaction techniques for ambiguity resolution in recognition-based interfaces

    Jennifer Mankoff;Scott E. Hudson;Gregory D. Abowd

  • Unlocking the expressivity of point lights

    Chris Harrison;John Horstman;Gary Hsieh;Scott Hudson

  • Examining the robustness of sensor-based statistical models of human interruptibility

    James Fogarty;Scott E. Hudson;Jennifer Lai

Frequent Co-Authors

Chris Harrison
Chris Harrison Carnegie Mellon University
Jennifer Mankoff
Jennifer Mankoff University of Washington
Jodi Forlizzi
Jodi Forlizzi Carnegie Mellon University
James Fogarty
James Fogarty University of Washington
Alanson P. Sample
Alanson P. Sample University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Amy Hurst
Amy Hurst New York University
Brad A. Myers
Brad A. Myers Carnegie Mellon University
Robert E. Kraut
Robert E. Kraut Carnegie Mellon University
James D. Foley
James D. Foley Georgia Institute of Technology
Ivan Poupyrev
Ivan Poupyrev Google (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a variety of related online degree programs and alternative career paths. Many students interested in advanced computational theory may consider an online theoretical physics degree. This path seamlessly blends complex mathematical concepts with computer modeling skills, providing a strong foundation for research-intensive roles.

Another fast-growing field is data science. With the rise of big data, professionals equipped with data science degrees are in high demand, working in analytics, machine learning, and artificial intelligence. For those more interested in hardware and system-level knowledge, an online bachelor’s in electrical engineering provides valuable expertise in both electronics and computing fundamentals.

Not all career pathways require a full degree; some students opt for easy certifications to get that can rapidly boost employability and salary potential. Popular certifications in technology and IT fields can be completed quickly and provide a strong return on investment. Exploring these diverse online options allows you to tailor your education to your personal interests and career ambitions.

Best Scientists Citing Scott E. Hudson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles