World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
83
Citations
30058
World Ranking
896
National Ranking
490

Jodi Forlizzi publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jodi Forlizzi sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 262 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Jodi Forlizzi D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jodi Forlizzi sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2020 - ACM Fellow For contributions to design research in human-computer interaction

Overview

Jodi Forlizzi is affiliated with Carnegie Mellon University in the United States and specializes in research at the intersection of social sciences and computer science. Their work primarily focuses on human-computer interaction and related fields, including sociology and political science, artificial intelligence, safety research, and social psychology.

Their research covers a range of main topics, such as ethics and social impacts of AI, innovative human-technology interaction, AI in service interactions, social robot interaction and human-robot interaction, data-driven disease surveillance, COVID-19 epidemiological studies, and information systems theories and implementation.

Notable recent publications include:

  • "An open repository of real-time COVID-19 indicators," 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "How Experienced Designers of Enterprise Applications Engage AI as a Design Material," 2022, CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
  • "Destruction, Catharsis, and Emotional Release in Human-Robot Interaction," 2020, ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction
  • "Charting the Automation of Hospitality: An Interdisciplinary Literature Review Examining the Evolution of Frontline Service work in the Face of Algorithmic Management," 2023, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • "Theory and Design Considerations for the User Experience of Smart Environments," 2022, IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems

Frequent coauthors in their research include John Zimmerman, Samantha Reig, Aaron Steinfeld, Hugo Simão, and Sarah Fox.

Jodi Forlizzi's work has been published in various venues, with multiple publications in arXiv (Cornell University), Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, interactions, Designing Interactive Systems Conference, and the Journal of Palliative Medicine.

In recognition of their contributions, Jodi Forlizzi was named an ACM Fellow in 2020 for contributions to design research in human-computer interaction.

Best Publications

  • Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI

    John Zimmerman;Jodi Forlizzi;Shelley Evenson

  • Understanding experience in interactive systems

    Jodi Forlizzi;Katja Battarbee

  • A stage-based model of personal informatics systems

    Ian Li;Anind Dey;Jodi Forlizzi

  • The building blocks of experience: an early framework for interaction designers

    Jodi Forlizzi;Shannon Ford

  • User experience over time: an initial framework

    Evangelos Karapanos;John Zimmerman;Jodi Forlizzi;Jean-Bernard Martens

  • An analysis and critique of Research through Design: towards a formalization of a research approach

    John Zimmerman;Erik Stolterman;Jodi Forlizzi

  • Service robots in the domestic environment: a study of the roomba vacuum in the home

    Jodi Forlizzi;Carl DiSalvo

  • All robots are not created equal: the design and perception of humanoid robot heads

    Carl F. DiSalvo;Francine Gemperle;Jodi Forlizzi;Sara Kiesler

  • Understanding my data, myself: supporting self-reflection with ubicomp technologies

    Ian Li;Anind K. Dey;Jodi Forlizzi

  • A design-centred framework for social human-robot interaction

    C. Bartneck;J. Forlizzi

  • Designing robots for long-term social interaction

    R. Gockley;A. Bruce;J. Forlizzi;M. Michalowski

  • Psycho-physiological measures for assessing cognitive load

    Eija Haapalainen;SeungJun Kim;Jodi F. Forlizzi;Anind K. Dey

  • Predicting human interruptibility with sensors

    James Fogarty;Scott E. Hudson;Christopher G. Atkeson;Daniel Avrahami

  • Robots in organizations: the role of workflow, social, and environmental factors in human-robot interaction

    Bilge Mutlu;Jodi Forlizzi

  • Intelligent Assistive Technology Applications to Dementia Care: Current Capabilities, Limitations, and Future Challenges

    Ashok J. Bharucha;Vivek Anand;Jodi Forlizzi;Mary Amanda Dew

  • UX Design Innovation: Challenges for Working with Machine Learning as a Design Material

    Graham Dove;Kim Halskov;Jodi Forlizzi;John Zimmerman

  • Research Through Design in HCI

    John Zimmerman;Jodi Forlizzi

  • Predicting human interruptibility with sensors: a Wizard of Oz feasibility study

    Scott Hudson;James Fogarty;Christopher Atkeson;Daniel Avrahami

  • A Storytelling Robot: Modeling and Evaluation of Human-like Gaze Behavior

    B. Mutlu;J. Forlizzi;J. Hodgins

  • Natural person-following behavior for social robots

    Rachel Gockley;Jodi Forlizzi;Reid Simmons

  • The ELDer project: social, emotional, and environmental factors in the design of eldercare technologies

    Tad Hirsch;Jodi Forlizzi;Elaine Hyder;Jennifer Goetz

Frequent Co-Authors

John Zimmerman
John Zimmerman Carnegie Mellon University
Anind K. Dey
Anind K. Dey University of Washington
Sara Kiesler
Sara Kiesler Carnegie Mellon University
Scott E. Hudson
Scott E. Hudson Carnegie Mellon University
William Odom
William Odom Simon Fraser University
Siddhartha S. Srinivasa
Siddhartha S. Srinivasa University of Washington
Bilge Mutlu
Bilge Mutlu University of Wisconsin–Madison
Reid Simmons
Reid Simmons Carnegie Mellon University
Jessica K. Hodgins
Jessica K. Hodgins Carnegie Mellon University
Aaron Steinfeld
Aaron Steinfeld Carnegie Mellon University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Computer Science can open doors to a diverse range of online degrees and career opportunities. Many students find that branching out into complementary fields enhances their skills and increases their job prospects. For those interested in leadership within technology sectors, affordable online executive mba programs help build business and management expertise that is essential for higher-level roles.

Professionals who wish to work with digital information systems or manage knowledge centers might consider a master's in library science online cost to understand the intersection of information technology and resource management.

If you're looking to expand your qualifications further, there are numerous pathways through an affordable master degree online across various subjects to suit your career goals and budget.

For those targeting top-tier leadership positions, a phd in leadership and management online can be the key to unlocking advanced research, consultancy, or executive roles in tech-driven organizations.

Best Scientists Citing Jodi Forlizzi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles