World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
38
Citations
5636
World Ranking
10303
National Ranking
409

William Odom publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William Odom sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 129 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

William Odom D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William Odom sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

William Odom is affiliated with Simon Fraser University in Canada and works primarily in the field of Computer Science, with a focus on Human-Computer Interaction (HCI). Their research spans multiple subfields including Sociology and Political Science, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, as well as Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

Their frequent research topics concentrate on innovative human-technology interaction, interactive and immersive displays, persona design and applications, green IT and sustainability, design education and practice, usability and user interface design, and participatory visual research methods.

William Odom has published extensively in several academic venues. The most frequent publication venues include:

  • Designing Interactive Systems Conference
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Abstracts with Programs - Geological Society of America
  • Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • Interacting with Computers

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by William Odom are:

  • Extending a Theory of Slow Technology for Design through Artifact Analysis, 2021, Human-Computer Interaction
  • Introduction to the special issue on time and HCI, 2021, Human-Computer Interaction
  • A Dozen Stickers on a Mailbox, 2021, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • Storywork & Reciprocity: On the Design of an Audio Documentary that Extends HCI Research back to Participants, 2022, Designing Interactive Systems Conference
  • On the Design of deformTable: Attending to Temporality and Materiality for Supporting Everyday Interactions with a Shape-Changing Artifact, 2022, Designing Interactive Systems Conference

William Odom has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • MinYoung Yoo
  • Amy Yo Sue Chen
  • Arne Berger
  • Erik Stolterman
  • Amon Rapp

Their work involves exploring the temporal and material aspects of technology design, with an emphasis on sustainability and participatory methods in research. This aligns with their focus on how humans interact with technology through innovative and immersive systems, as well as the development of personas for more effective interface design.

Best Publications

  • Understanding why we preserve some things and discard others in the context of interaction design

    William Odom;James Pierce;Erik Stolterman;Eli Blevis

  • From Research Prototype to Research Product

    William Odom;Ron Wakkary;Youn-kyung Lim;Audrey Desjardins

  • Teenagers and their virtual possessions: design opportunities and issues

    William Odom;John Zimmerman;Jodi Forlizzi

  • Material speculation: actual artifacts for critical inquiry

    Ron Wakkary;William Odom;Sabrina Hauser;Garnet Hertz

  • Designing for slowness, anticipation and re-visitation: a long term field study of the photobox

    William T. Odom;Abigail J. Sellen;Richard Banks;David S. Kirk

  • Energy aware dwelling: a critical survey of interaction design for eco-visualizations

    James Pierce;William Odom;Eli Blevis

  • Technology heirlooms?: considerations for passing down and inheriting digital materials

    William Odom;Richard Banks;David Kirk;Richard Harper

  • A fieldwork of the future with user enactments

    William Odom;John Zimmerman;Scott Davidoff;Jodi Forlizzi

  • Passing on & putting to rest: understanding bereavement in the context of interactive technologies

    William Odom;Richard Harper;Abigail Sellen;David Kirk

  • Sustainable millennials: attitudes towards sustainability and the material effects of interactive technologies

    Kristin Hanks;William Odom;David Roedl;Eli Blevis

  • Lost in translation: understanding the possession of digital things in the cloud

    William Odom;Abi Sellen;Richard Harper;Eno Thereska

  • Digital artifacts as legacy: exploring the lifespan and value of digital data

    Rebecca Gulotta;William Odom;Jodi Forlizzi;Haakon Faste

  • Slow technology: critical reflection and future directions

    William Odom;Richard Banks;Abigail Durrant;David Kirk

  • The Frustrations and Benefits of Mobile Device Usage in the Home when Co-Present with Family Members

    Erick Oduor;Carman Neustaedter;William Odom;Anthony Tang

  • Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference

    Ilpo Koskinen;Youn-kyung Lim;Teresa Cerratto-Pargman;Kenny Chow

  • The Experience of Embodied Space in Virtual Worlds: An Ethnography of a Second Life Community

    Shaowen Bardzell;William Odom

  • Matters of life and death: locating the end of life in lifespan-oriented hci research

    Michael Massimi;William Odom;Richard Banks;David Kirk

  • Photobox: on the design of a slow technology

    William Odom;Mark Selby;Abigail Sellen;David Kirk

  • Placelessness, spacelessness, and formlessness: experiential qualities of virtual possessions

    William Odom;John Zimmerman;Jodi Forlizzi

  • "Mate, we don't need a chip to tell us the soil's dry": opportunities for designing interactive systems to support urban food production

    William Odom

  • Investigating Genres and Perspectives in HCI Research on the Home

    Audrey Desjardins;Ron Wakkary;William Odom

Frequent Co-Authors

Ron Wakkary
Ron Wakkary Simon Fraser University
John Zimmerman
John Zimmerman Carnegie Mellon University
Jodi Forlizzi
Jodi Forlizzi Carnegie Mellon University
Richard Banks
Richard Banks Microsoft (United States)
David Kirk
David Kirk Newcastle University
Carman Neustaedter
Carman Neustaedter Simon Fraser University
Abigail Sellen
Abigail Sellen Microsoft (United States)
Richard Harper
Richard Harper Social Shaping Research
William Gaver
William Gaver Northumbria University
Erik Stolterman
Erik Stolterman Indiana University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Aspiring students interested in Computer Science have a wealth of flexible options in the U.S., including fully online degrees and career pathways that intersect various STEM fields. Many accredited schools now offer a 1 year computer science degree online, ideal for those with prior credits or professional experience seeking a rapid transition into tech roles.

For applicants who are concerned about their academic records, it’s important to research which will grad schools accept low gpa as admissions requirements differ between institutions. Flexible entry criteria can open doors for motivated learners to pursue advanced study or switch careers.

Related disciplines like environmental science and engineering can also be pursued online. If you’re passionate about sustainability, you may be interested in what environmental science degree graduates can do, or consider an environmental engineering bachelor's degree online for a more technical career path.

No matter your background, online degree programs in these fields offer flexible, affordable, and accelerated pathways to rewarding careers in technology and science.

Best Scientists Citing William Odom

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles