World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
49
Citations
8370
World Ranking
5948
National Ranking
2682

Eric Paulos publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric Paulos sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 144 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Eric Paulos D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric Paulos sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Eric Paulos is affiliated with the University of California, Berkeley in the United States. Their research primarily situates within the fields of Computer Science and Engineering, focusing particularly on subfields such as Human-Computer Interaction, Biomedical Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Information Systems, and Software.

The scientist's work revolves around topics including Innovative Human-Technology Interaction, Interactive and Immersive Displays, Usability and User Interface Design, Green IT and Sustainability, Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials, Software Engineering Research, and Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques.

Recent publications by Eric Paulos demonstrate engagement with various aspects of interactive systems and human-computer interaction. These include:

  • Towards Decomposable Interactive Systems: Design of a Backyard-Degradable Wireless Heating Interface, 2022, CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
  • Unmaking@CHI: Concretizing the Material and Epistemological Practices of Unmaking in HCI, 2022, CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts
  • Towards Creative Version Control, 2022, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • Creative and Motivational Strategies Used by Expert Creative Practitioners, 2022, Creativity and Cognition
  • Unmaking and HCI: Techniques, Technologies, Materials, and Philosophies beyond Making, 2024, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction

Frequent coauthors who have collaborated with Eric Paulos include Katherine Song, Molly Jane Nicholas, Samar Sabie, Steven J. Jackson, and Kristina Lindström.

Notable publication venues where their research appears consist of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, and Creativity and Cognition.

Best Publications

  • Rise of the expert amateur: DIY projects, communities, and cultures

    Stacey Kuznetsov;Eric Paulos

  • The familiar stranger: anxiety, comfort, and play in public places

    Eric Paulos;Elizabeth Goodman

  • Home, habits, and energy: examining domestic interactions and energy consumption

    James Pierce;Diane J. Schiano;Eric Paulos

  • Beyond energy monitors: interaction, energy, and emerging energy systems

    James Pierce;Eric Paulos

  • "I don't Want to Wear a Screen": Probing Perceptions of and Possibilities for Dynamic Displays on Clothing

    Laura Devendorf;Joanne Lo;Noura Howell;Jung Lin Lee

  • A vehicle for research: using street sweepers to explore the landscape of environmental community action

    Paul M. Aoki;R. J. Honicky;Alan Mainwaring;Chris Myers

  • Urban probes: encountering our emerging urban atmospheres

    Eric Paulos;Tom Jenkins

  • N-smarts: networked suite of mobile atmospheric real-time sensors

    Richard Honicky;Eric A. Brewer;Eric Paulos;Richard White

  • PRoP: personal roving presence

    Eric Paulos;John Canny

  • UpStream: motivating water conservation with low-cost water flow sensing and persuasive displays

    Stacey Kuznetsov;Eric Paulos

  • Guest Editors' Introduction: Urban Computing

    Tim Kindberg;Matthew Chalmers;Eric Paulos

  • Sensr: evaluating a flexible framework for authoring mobile data-collection tools for citizen science

    Sunyoung Kim;Jennifer Mankoff;Eric Paulos

  • Materializing energy

    James Pierce;Eric Paulos

  • Ubiquitous tele-embodiment

    Eric Paulos;John Canny

  • InAir: sharing indoor air quality measurements and visualizations

    Sunyoung Kim;Eric Paulos

  • Delivering real reality to the World Wide Web via telerobotics

    E. Paulos;J. Canny

  • It's not all about "Green": energy use in low-income communities

    Tawanna Dillahunt;Jennifer Mankoff;Eric Paulos;Susan Fussell

  • Some consideration on the (in)effectiveness of residential energy feedback systems

    James Pierce;Chloe Fan;Derek Lomas;Gabriela Marcu

  • DIY for CHI: methods, communities, and values of reuse and customization

    Leah Buechley;Daniela K. Rosner;Eric Paulos;Amanda Williams

  • Social Tele-Embodiment: Understanding Presence

    Eric Paulos;John Canny

  • Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems

    Ron Wakkary;Steve Harrison;Carman Neustaedter;Shaowen Bardzell

  • PRoP: personal roving presence

    Eric Paulos

Frequent Co-Authors

John Canny
John Canny University of California, Berkeley
Jennifer Mankoff
Jennifer Mankoff University of Washington
Marcus Foth
Marcus Foth Queensland University of Technology
Ken Goldberg
Ken Goldberg University of California, Berkeley
Ron Wakkary
Ron Wakkary Simon Fraser University
Mark D. Gross
Mark D. Gross University of Colorado Boulder
Scott E. Hudson
Scott E. Hudson Carnegie Mellon University
Allison Woodruff
Allison Woodruff Google (United States)
Paul M. Aoki
Paul M. Aoki Google (United States)
Paul Dourish
Paul Dourish University of California, Irvine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a Computer Science degree in the USA opens doors to many related online programs and lucrative careers. Many students pursue online electrical engineering courses USA to build a diverse IT skill set and improve their employment prospects across technology-driven industries.

Beyond traditional degrees, obtaining certifications that pay well can quickly boost earning potential and help you stand out in the competitive tech job market. These certifications often require less time and investment compared to full degree programs.

If you aim to advance your education efficiently, explore the fastest online master's degree options. These programs are designed for working professionals seeking to upskill or shift careers without putting their jobs on hold.

For long-term career growth, choosing from the most useful graduate degrees is essential. In-demand programs, such as data science, cybersecurity, and advanced software engineering, consistently lead to exciting roles and higher salaries in the tech sector.

Best Scientists Citing Eric Paulos

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles