World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
40
Citations
5982
World Ranking
9375
National Ranking
3976

Mark D. Gross publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark D. Gross sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 175 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Mark D. Gross D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark D. Gross sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark D. Gross is affiliated with the University of Colorado Boulder in the United States. Their research encompasses several interdisciplinary fields, focusing primarily on aspects of human-computer interaction, computer vision and pattern recognition, statistical and nonlinear physics, mathematical physics, and social psychology.

Their work addresses both theoretical and applied topics, reflected in multiple recent papers spanning areas such as migration health, augmented and virtual reality applications, and advanced mathematics.

Selected recent publications include:

  • "Internal migration and health in South Africa: determinants of healthcare utilisation in a young adult cohort" (2021), published in BMC Public Health
  • "AR Drum Circle: Real-Time Collaborative Drumming in AR" (2022), published in Frontiers in Virtual Reality
  • "From architects' terms to computable descriptions of spatial qualities" (2021), published in Spatial Cognition and Computation
  • "What Information Should a Robot Convey?" (2021), presented at the 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)
  • "The Higher Dimensional Tropical Vertex" (2020), published in arXiv (Cornell University)

Gross frequently collaborates with a consistent group of co-authors, including Nathanaël Berestycki, Martin R. Bridson, K. Falconer, A Gra N Ville, and Darshan Ranganathan, each appearing in 16 joint publications.

Their publications often appear in established venues such as Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, arXiv (Cornell University), BMC Public Health, Frontiers in Virtual Reality, and Spatial Cognition and Computation.

Their research topics cover a range of subjects, including:

  • Nonlinear Waves and Solitons
  • Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Augmented Reality Applications
  • Advanced Algebra and Geometry
  • Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Migration and Labor Dynamics
  • Global Maternal and Child Health

Subfields of study reflected in their work include:

  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
  • Mathematical Physics
  • Social Psychology

Best Publications

  • Ambiguous intentions: a paper-like interface for creative design

    Mark D. Gross;Ellen Yi-Luen Do

  • The Electronic Cocktail Napkin—a computational environment for working with design diagrams

    Mark D. Gross

  • Interactive fabrication: new interfaces for digital fabrication

    Karl D.D. Willis;Cheng Xu;Kuan-Ju Wu;Golan Levin

  • A theoretical framework of design critiquing in architecture studios

    Yeonjoo Oh;Suguru Ishizaki;Mark D. Gross;Ellen Yi-Luen Do

  • Thinking with Diagrams in Architectural Design

    Ellen Yi-Luen Do;Mark D. Gross

  • roBlocks: a robotic construction kit for mathematics and science education

    Eric Schweikardt;Mark D. Gross

  • Digital clay: deriving digital models from freehand sketches

    Eric Schweikardt;Mark D. Gross

  • LiftTiles: Constructive Building Blocks for Prototyping Room-scale Shape-changing Interfaces

    Ryo Suzuki;Ryosuke Nakayama;Dan Liu;Yasuaki Kakehi

  • ShapeBots: Shape-changing Swarm Robots

    Ryo Suzuki;Clement Zheng;Yasuaki Kakehi;Tom Yeh

  • Educational Construction Kit

    Eric Schweikardt;Mark D. Gross

  • Constraints: Knowledge representation in design

    Mark D. Gross;Stephen M. Ervin;James A. Anderson;Aaron Fleisher

  • Concept design games

    N.John Habraken;Mark D. Gross

  • Navigational blocks: navigating information space with tangible media

    Ken Camarata;Ellen Yi-Luen Do;Brian R. Johnson;Mark D. Gross

  • Annotating and sketching on 3D web models

    Thomas Jung;Mark D. Gross;Ellen Yi-Luen Do

  • Demonstrating the electronic cocktail napkin: a paper-like interface for early design

    Mark D. Gross;Ellen Yi Luen Do

  • RoomShift: Room-scale Dynamic Haptics for VR with Furniture-moving Swarm Robots

    Ryo Suzuki;Hooman Hedayati;Clement Zheng;James L. Bohn

  • Drawing on the Back of an Envelope: a framework for interacting with application programs by freehand drawing

    Mark D Gross;Ellen Yi-Luen Do

  • Computational Support for Sketching in Design

    Gabe Johnson;Mark D. Gross;Jason Hong;Ellen Yi-Luen Do

  • Recognizing and interpreting diagrams in design

    Mark D. Gross

  • Drawing as a Means to Design Reasoning

    Ellen Yi-Luen Do;Mark D. Gross

  • Interactive paper devices: end-user design & fabrication

    Greg Saul;Cheng Xu;Mark D. Gross

  • Red balloon, green balloon, sensors in the sky

    Stacey Kuznetsov;George Noel Davis;Eric Paulos;Mark D. Gross

Frequent Co-Authors

Eric Paulos
Eric Paulos University of California, Berkeley
Jason Hong
Jason Hong Carnegie Mellon University
Koji Yatani
Koji Yatani University of Tokyo
Yoshihiro Kawahara
Yoshihiro Kawahara University of Tokyo
Stephen Brewster
Stephen Brewster University of Glasgow
Christoph Keplinger
Christoph Keplinger Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems
Seth Copen Goldstein
Seth Copen Goldstein Carnegie Mellon University
James D. Herbsleb
James D. Herbsleb Carnegie Mellon University
Sara Kiesler
Sara Kiesler Carnegie Mellon University
Lucy Fortson
Lucy Fortson University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education in Computer Science opens a world of flexible possibilities. Many students start with 2 year online degrees, providing a quick and affordable route into the tech field or a stepping stone to further studies.

For those mindful of budget, there are plenty of cheapest online college options, making computer science degrees accessible without incurring large amounts of debt. It's also possible to find a college that accepts low gpa, offering second chances to students who may not have a perfect academic record but are eager to pursue a tech career.

Your career pathway can be as unique as your interests. Graduates often find roles in software development, data analysis, and tech support. Alternatively, those interested in intersecting fields like education or sustainability can explore jobs with elementary education and environmental science degree, showcasing the diverse applications of a science background. No matter your academic history or future ambitions, online degrees can create new opportunities in Computer Science and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Mark D. Gross

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles